Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

There isn’t even an allegation of spreading rumors, nor did he spread rumors. This one has really gotten you into full blown distraction mode.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Blake shouldn’t have made him hire a trainer? You can go back to his Instagram when they followed each other before shooting started. He had a picture of him exercising. She actually shamed him and said “ try doing that eight months pregnant”.

See how easy it is to twist things? See how easy it was to say the she probably should’ve maintain more professional boundaries?

Ridiculous.

If he felt shamed by that I’m sure it would have been in his 179 page complaint.

Missed the whole point. A reasonable person wouldn’t have been shamed by that. He probably didn’t think a thing of it because he’s a rational . She is taking normal, reasonable interactions, and is demonstrating that she is way over sensitive to them. To the point where she’s blackballing someone from an industry and taking over this movie and the next one from him.

I am a normal, reasonable person. If my colleague asked my trainer how much I weight behind my back, I would be pissed. That is not appropriate.

Is your colleague an actor who is supposed to physically lift you as part of your job? All of these comparisons to white collar workplaces are obviously totally off. If BL wanted that kind of workplace she should have gone into accounting.

I've had jobs where people had to lift me before (I was a dancer). I would be very annoyed if someone tried to handle a concern about a lift by going behind my back to my trainer to ask about my weight. That's not how you do this. First of all, if you are worried about doing a lift, you talk to the director/choreographer about your concerns. And likely a rehearsal would be scheduled to practice the lift with an eye towards making it safe for all involved. You have professionals on hand during the rehearsal to help you prep your body for the lift and avoid injury. It's about your limitations, not the other person's weight. Everyone stays professional and you don't sit around saying "oh no, do you think she's too big for me to lift??" That would be so passive aggressive and tacky.

You seem very sensitive but even if it were tacky, it’s not sexual harassment or anything close to it

I'm not actually sensitive about my weight at all and I've also been the person doing the lifting, including lifting people who are bigger than I am. I also have chronic back issues. There are professional ways to handle this issue.

And yes, if someone did this while also doing the other things Baldoni is accused of, I think that would constitute sexual harassment. On its own it would merely be tacky/annoying. But Lively's complaint is not merely alleging Baldoni sexually harassed her by asking her trainer about her weight. It's of a piece with a bunch of behaviors that taken together, may constitute harassment.

Wasn’t the video a piece of her allegations though? Why is she trying to gag the lawyer if the video proves her claims?

She is asking that discovery be conducted via the normal process, instead of piecemeal via the press and a website where they trickle out cherry picked evidence they think will make Lively look bad and taint the jury pool.

If there is footage from the production that shows Baldoni being unequivocally gross and inappropriate, do you think Baldoni and his lawyer are going to release that to the press? Of course not. They'll bury that in discovery and hope that by the time it comes out, they have so effectively destroyed Lively's reputation that no one cares. This is also what happened with Amber Heard, who did in fact have compelling evidence of Depp being abusive, but by the time it came out she had been so thoroughly raked over the coals that no one cared. It's the same playbook.

So it's reasonable for Lively to ask that evidence go through the discovery process, where it all has to be disclosed and both parties have access to it. Then the evidence comes out together and people can decide based on all the info. Baldoni and his lawyer want to present people with their best evidence that Lively is wrong so that they are in the best possible position when evidence that makes Baldoni looks bad comes out (and I feel pretty confident such evidence exists, it always does in these he said/she said cases -- there is going to to be stuff that make Baldoni look terrible, like footage of him telling Lively he's communing with her dead dad for instance). It's a game.

Lively is not trying to prevent the evidence from coming out at all, she's asking that the evidence be released in a way that doesn't unfairly disadvantage her at trial.

There is so much wrong with this, but let’s start with him saying he is communing with her dead dad is not remotely sexual harassment.

What is it then? Is it normal?

Where is the sexual component? He’s allowed to be odd, that isn’t sexual harassment, or even actionable at all.

He didn't like that she asked him to stop and retaliated by launching a PR smear campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

There isn’t even an allegation of spreading rumors, nor did he spread rumors. This one has really gotten you into full blown distraction mode.

But according to you it only counts if it's made directly to the plaintiff.

[Anonymous]

What was the point of the OP? Trashing her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Blake shouldn’t have made him hire a trainer? You can go back to his Instagram when they followed each other before shooting started. He had a picture of him exercising. She actually shamed him and said “ try doing that eight months pregnant”.

See how easy it is to twist things? See how easy it was to say the she probably should’ve maintain more professional boundaries?

Ridiculous.

If he felt shamed by that I’m sure it would have been in his 179 page complaint.

Missed the whole point. A reasonable person wouldn’t have been shamed by that. He probably didn’t think a thing of it because he’s a rational . She is taking normal, reasonable interactions, and is demonstrating that she is way over sensitive to them. To the point where she’s blackballing someone from an industry and taking over this movie and the next one from him.

I am a normal, reasonable person. If my colleague asked my trainer how much I weight behind my back, I would be pissed. That is not appropriate.

Is your colleague an actor who is supposed to physically lift you as part of your job? All of these comparisons to white collar workplaces are obviously totally off. If BL wanted that kind of workplace she should have gone into accounting.

I've had jobs where people had to lift me before (I was a dancer). I would be very annoyed if someone tried to handle a concern about a lift by going behind my back to my trainer to ask about my weight. That's not how you do this. First of all, if you are worried about doing a lift, you talk to the director/choreographer about your concerns. And likely a rehearsal would be scheduled to practice the lift with an eye towards making it safe for all involved. You have professionals on hand during the rehearsal to help you prep your body for the lift and avoid injury. It's about your limitations, not the other person's weight. Everyone stays professional and you don't sit around saying "oh no, do you think she's too big for me to lift??" That would be so passive aggressive and tacky.

You seem very sensitive but even if it were tacky, it’s not sexual harassment or anything close to it

I'm not actually sensitive about my weight at all and I've also been the person doing the lifting, including lifting people who are bigger than I am. I also have chronic back issues. There are professional ways to handle this issue.

And yes, if someone did this while also doing the other things Baldoni is accused of, I think that would constitute sexual harassment. On its own it would merely be tacky/annoying. But Lively's complaint is not merely alleging Baldoni sexually harassed her by asking her trainer about her weight. It's of a piece with a bunch of behaviors that taken together, may constitute harassment.

Wasn’t the video a piece of her allegations though? Why is she trying to gag the lawyer if the video proves her claims?

She is asking that discovery be conducted via the normal process, instead of piecemeal via the press and a website where they trickle out cherry picked evidence they think will make Lively look bad and taint the jury pool.

If there is footage from the production that shows Baldoni being unequivocally gross and inappropriate, do you think Baldoni and his lawyer are going to release that to the press? Of course not. They'll bury that in discovery and hope that by the time it comes out, they have so effectively destroyed Lively's reputation that no one cares. This is also what happened with Amber Heard, who did in fact have compelling evidence of Depp being abusive, but by the time it came out she had been so thoroughly raked over the coals that no one cared. It's the same playbook.

So it's reasonable for Lively to ask that evidence go through the discovery process, where it all has to be disclosed and both parties have access to it. Then the evidence comes out together and people can decide based on all the info. Baldoni and his lawyer want to present people with their best evidence that Lively is wrong so that they are in the best possible position when evidence that makes Baldoni looks bad comes out (and I feel pretty confident such evidence exists, it always does in these he said/she said cases -- there is going to to be stuff that make Baldoni look terrible, like footage of him telling Lively he's communing with her dead dad for instance). It's a game.

Lively is not trying to prevent the evidence from coming out at all, she's asking that the evidence be released in a way that doesn't unfairly disadvantage her at trial.

There is so much wrong with this, but let’s start with him saying he is communing with her dead dad is not remotely sexual harassment.

What is it then? Is it normal?

Where is the sexual component? He’s allowed to be odd, that isn’t sexual harassment, or even actionable at all.

It is actionable. If you were at work and your boss kept telling you they were talking to your dead dad and you repeatedly asked them not to and they kept doing it, it would 100% be actionable. Behavior like that can make it hard for someone to do their job, impact their mental health, and be a violation of a worker's privacy.

Lively's complaint is not just about sexual harassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

There isn’t even an allegation of spreading rumors, nor did he spread rumors. This one has really gotten you into full blown distraction mode.

But according to you it only counts if it's made directly to the plaintiff.

When it is a direct question about her weight, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Blake shouldn’t have made him hire a trainer? You can go back to his Instagram when they followed each other before shooting started. He had a picture of him exercising. She actually shamed him and said “ try doing that eight months pregnant”.

See how easy it is to twist things? See how easy it was to say the she probably should’ve maintain more professional boundaries?

Ridiculous.

If he felt shamed by that I’m sure it would have been in his 179 page complaint.

Missed the whole point. A reasonable person wouldn’t have been shamed by that. He probably didn’t think a thing of it because he’s a rational . She is taking normal, reasonable interactions, and is demonstrating that she is way over sensitive to them. To the point where she’s blackballing someone from an industry and taking over this movie and the next one from him.

I am a normal, reasonable person. If my colleague asked my trainer how much I weight behind my back, I would be pissed. That is not appropriate.

Is your colleague an actor who is supposed to physically lift you as part of your job? All of these comparisons to white collar workplaces are obviously totally off. If BL wanted that kind of workplace she should have gone into accounting.

I've had jobs where people had to lift me before (I was a dancer). I would be very annoyed if someone tried to handle a concern about a lift by going behind my back to my trainer to ask about my weight. That's not how you do this. First of all, if you are worried about doing a lift, you talk to the director/choreographer about your concerns. And likely a rehearsal would be scheduled to practice the lift with an eye towards making it safe for all involved. You have professionals on hand during the rehearsal to help you prep your body for the lift and avoid injury. It's about your limitations, not the other person's weight. Everyone stays professional and you don't sit around saying "oh no, do you think she's too big for me to lift??" That would be so passive aggressive and tacky.

You seem very sensitive but even if it were tacky, it’s not sexual harassment or anything close to it

I'm not actually sensitive about my weight at all and I've also been the person doing the lifting, including lifting people who are bigger than I am. I also have chronic back issues. There are professional ways to handle this issue.

And yes, if someone did this while also doing the other things Baldoni is accused of, I think that would constitute sexual harassment. On its own it would merely be tacky/annoying. But Lively's complaint is not merely alleging Baldoni sexually harassed her by asking her trainer about her weight. It's of a piece with a bunch of behaviors that taken together, may constitute harassment.

Wasn’t the video a piece of her allegations though? Why is she trying to gag the lawyer if the video proves her claims?

She is asking that discovery be conducted via the normal process, instead of piecemeal via the press and a website where they trickle out cherry picked evidence they think will make Lively look bad and taint the jury pool.

If there is footage from the production that shows Baldoni being unequivocally gross and inappropriate, do you think Baldoni and his lawyer are going to release that to the press? Of course not. They'll bury that in discovery and hope that by the time it comes out, they have so effectively destroyed Lively's reputation that no one cares. This is also what happened with Amber Heard, who did in fact have compelling evidence of Depp being abusive, but by the time it came out she had been so thoroughly raked over the coals that no one cared. It's the same playbook.

So it's reasonable for Lively to ask that evidence go through the discovery process, where it all has to be disclosed and both parties have access to it. Then the evidence comes out together and people can decide based on all the info. Baldoni and his lawyer want to present people with their best evidence that Lively is wrong so that they are in the best possible position when evidence that makes Baldoni looks bad comes out (and I feel pretty confident such evidence exists, it always does in these he said/she said cases -- there is going to to be stuff that make Baldoni look terrible, like footage of him telling Lively he's communing with her dead dad for instance). It's a game.

Lively is not trying to prevent the evidence from coming out at all, she's asking that the evidence be released in a way that doesn't unfairly disadvantage her at trial.

There is so much wrong with this, but let’s start with him saying he is communing with her dead dad is not remotely sexual harassment.

What is it then? Is it normal?

Where is the sexual component? He’s allowed to be odd, that isn’t sexual harassment, or even actionable at all.

It is actionable. If you were at work and your boss kept telling you they were talking to your dead dad and you repeatedly asked them not to and they kept doing it, it would 100% be actionable. Behavior like that can make it hard for someone to do their job, impact their mental health, and be a violation of a worker's privacy.

Lively's complaint is not just about sexual harassment.

The cause of action is Sexual Harassment, so no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe Blake shouldn’t have made him hire a trainer? You can go back to his Instagram when they followed each other before shooting started. He had a picture of him exercising. She actually shamed him and said “ try doing that eight months pregnant”.

See how easy it is to twist things? See how easy it was to say the she probably should’ve maintain more professional boundaries?

Ridiculous.

If he felt shamed by that I’m sure it would have been in his 179 page complaint.

Missed the whole point. A reasonable person wouldn’t have been shamed by that. He probably didn’t think a thing of it because he’s a rational . She is taking normal, reasonable interactions, and is demonstrating that she is way over sensitive to them. To the point where she’s blackballing someone from an industry and taking over this movie and the next one from him.

I am a normal, reasonable person. If my colleague asked my trainer how much I weight behind my back, I would be pissed. That is not appropriate.

Is your colleague an actor who is supposed to physically lift you as part of your job? All of these comparisons to white collar workplaces are obviously totally off. If BL wanted that kind of workplace she should have gone into accounting.

I've had jobs where people had to lift me before (I was a dancer). I would be very annoyed if someone tried to handle a concern about a lift by going behind my back to my trainer to ask about my weight. That's not how you do this. First of all, if you are worried about doing a lift, you talk to the director/choreographer about your concerns. And likely a rehearsal would be scheduled to practice the lift with an eye towards making it safe for all involved. You have professionals on hand during the rehearsal to help you prep your body for the lift and avoid injury. It's about your limitations, not the other person's weight. Everyone stays professional and you don't sit around saying "oh no, do you think she's too big for me to lift??" That would be so passive aggressive and tacky.

You seem very sensitive but even if it were tacky, it’s not sexual harassment or anything close to it

I'm not actually sensitive about my weight at all and I've also been the person doing the lifting, including lifting people who are bigger than I am. I also have chronic back issues. There are professional ways to handle this issue.

And yes, if someone did this while also doing the other things Baldoni is accused of, I think that would constitute sexual harassment. On its own it would merely be tacky/annoying. But Lively's complaint is not merely alleging Baldoni sexually harassed her by asking her trainer about her weight. It's of a piece with a bunch of behaviors that taken together, may constitute harassment.

Wasn’t the video a piece of her allegations though? Why is she trying to gag the lawyer if the video proves her claims?

She is asking that discovery be conducted via the normal process, instead of piecemeal via the press and a website where they trickle out cherry picked evidence they think will make Lively look bad and taint the jury pool.

If there is footage from the production that shows Baldoni being unequivocally gross and inappropriate, do you think Baldoni and his lawyer are going to release that to the press? Of course not. They'll bury that in discovery and hope that by the time it comes out, they have so effectively destroyed Lively's reputation that no one cares. This is also what happened with Amber Heard, who did in fact have compelling evidence of Depp being abusive, but by the time it came out she had been so thoroughly raked over the coals that no one cared. It's the same playbook.

So it's reasonable for Lively to ask that evidence go through the discovery process, where it all has to be disclosed and both parties have access to it. Then the evidence comes out together and people can decide based on all the info. Baldoni and his lawyer want to present people with their best evidence that Lively is wrong so that they are in the best possible position when evidence that makes Baldoni looks bad comes out (and I feel pretty confident such evidence exists, it always does in these he said/she said cases -- there is going to to be stuff that make Baldoni look terrible, like footage of him telling Lively he's communing with her dead dad for instance). It's a game.

Lively is not trying to prevent the evidence from coming out at all, she's asking that the evidence be released in a way that doesn't unfairly disadvantage her at trial.

There is so much wrong with this, but let’s start with him saying he is communing with her dead dad is not remotely sexual harassment.

What is it then? Is it normal?

Where is the sexual component? He’s allowed to be odd, that isn’t sexual harassment, or even actionable at all.

He didn't like that she asked him to stop and retaliated by launching a PR smear campaign.

This. Baldoni was worried that Lively would start revealing all the MANY weird, invasive, and inappropriate things he did on the production. Including some stuff that was sexual but also including stuff that was just obnoxious and unprofessional. That's why he hired the PR firm and that's why they brought on a crisis specialist -- because they knew the details about how Baldoni had behaved on set could destroy him professionally.

Think about that. They didn't bring on a crisis specialist because they were worried Lively was going to randomly invent lies about Baldoni. They were worried she would reveal what had actually happened, and Baldoni's behavior was questionable enough that the truth coming out was considered a "crisis" for him and his team.

He went on the offensive instead, hiring Johnny Depp's PR/crisis team, and hasn't let up since.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

There isn’t even an allegation of spreading rumors, nor did he spread rumors. This one has really gotten you into full blown distraction mode.

But according to you it only counts if it's made directly to the plaintiff.

When it is a direct question about her weight, yes.

That is your opinion, not a fact. He didn't need to know and it contributed to the hostile work environment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So fat shaming (if that is in fact what happened) is sexual harassment? I guess from a white woman tears perspective it is.

Criticizing the weight of a woman, or implying she needs to weight less, can absolutely be sexual harassment. And would be for a woman of any race.

Also the fact that Lively was recovering from pregnancy and childbirth is also relevant. Pregnancy/childbirth are considered protected disabilities in the workplace.

Nobody criticized her weight; and criticism of weight (without more) is NOT sexual harassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

There isn’t even an allegation of spreading rumors, nor did he spread rumors. This one has really gotten you into full blown distraction mode.

But according to you it only counts if it's made directly to the plaintiff.

When it is a direct question about her weight, yes.

That is your opinion, not a fact. He didn't need to know and it contributed to the hostile work environment.

It’s my opinion as an attorney who has been practicing for a few decades, yes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So fat shaming (if that is in fact what happened) is sexual harassment? I guess from a white woman tears perspective it is.

Criticizing the weight of a woman, or implying she needs to weight less, can absolutely be sexual harassment. And would be for a woman of any race.

Also the fact that Lively was recovering from pregnancy and childbirth is also relevant. Pregnancy/childbirth are considered protected disabilities in the workplace.

Nobody criticized her weight; and criticism of weight (without more) is NOT sexual harassment.

But it is part of her complaint that it was a hostile work environment and retaliating against that is illegal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:But then he knows the weight of this famous person, and, if he wants to be a jerk about it later, he can laugh about it with his friends, or float out to the public how much she weighed after her baby etc. I think it's a touchy subject in Hollywood, and i don't think famous actresses just want their weight to be public knowledge. While he seemed to have a reason for the info, that reason could also just be a pretext -- and as others have said, he could easily solve the back problem without knowing the precise weight.

And for that matter, why didn't he just tell the trainer "With my back issues I can handle weights of up to 170 pounds, can you help me with strategies for whatever weight we have here?" rather than asking for her weight? Why did he think it was fine to come to the table with absolutely nothing? Seems like he didn't know his own weight lifting limits and was just fishing for personal info, which is gross.

Does anyone really care? Is anyone that interested in exactly how much Jennifer Aniston etc weigh? We can see what these people look like, often in revealing outfits or scenes etc, who is "floating out in public" or sharing that # with a bunch of ppl?

I think a lot of the reaction here is that if you are soooo sensitive about a lot of minor things, this kind of field or role is not for you. Lots of other jobs out there but guess what they don't make you rich and famous.

What world are you living in to think a famous actresses weight is not a big deal? You are detached from reality.

We’ve moved on. The comment to the trainer is not actionable as sexual harassment of Blake because it was not made to Blake, he intended for Blake to not know of his conversation with the trainer, and was for a valid work purpose. For it to be even possibly be actionable, the question would have had to be directly to Blake.

It wasn't valid or necessary. You don't just get to say so and demand everyone move on.

Even if you don’t agree on those points, he didn’t pose the question to Blake. A very basic part of the cause of action is that actionable statements are made directly to the plaintiff. There is no sexual harassment by victim proxy.

So spreading rumors behind someone's back wouldn't be sexual harassment? I think you need to go back to law school.

There isn’t even an allegation of spreading rumors, nor did he spread rumors. This one has really gotten you into full blown distraction mode.

But according to you it only counts if it's made directly to the plaintiff.

When it is a direct question about her weight, yes.

That is your opinion, not a fact. He didn't need to know and it contributed to the hostile work environment.

It’s my opinion as an attorney who has been practicing for a few decades, yes.

You don't seem to be an especially good one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope a lawyer would clarify whether asking about a woman’s weight is in fact sexual harassment—not the poster who is obsessed with fat shaming.

lawyer who did sexual harassment cases. No, without a LOT more, it’s not sexual harassment to ask about a woman’s weight, particularly when there is a legitimate work-related reason to do so. Even if it was “fat shaming,” unless you can show that it was “because of sex” then it still wouldn’t qualify. And Baldoni can as easily claim that he thought he was being discreet and protecting her from distress by asking the trainer and not her directly. The claim holds zero water.