What does everyone think about SYC

Anonymous
I guess that is my question since I am looking at the club for a U9G. Do the good kids leave for higher level clubs and therefore, there older teams don't perform as well?
Anonymous
The real question is why are SYC coaches ALWAYS on this forum?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess I am having a hard time seeing how SYC doesn't prioritize player development. The younger teams seem to have performed well at the Virginian even in the top brackets. They must be doing some player development right?? What am I missing something?


Just watch them play


Just watch them practice.

They disregarded COVID restrictions pretty much the whole year. Fields were packed like sardines!
Every team got their 1/4 of space to practice. LOL.
Anonymous
That is one of SYC biggest issues...they have too many teams and no field space for a good practice. it's all scrimmaging with other age groups.
Anonymous
Leaving SYC this year and not the only one. Many other parents are also in process and some are simply hanging in with the illusion that their DS or DD will move up. There is no practice space and player development is minimal. Time to leave a sinking ship.
Anonymous
My kid's team played SYC 07 this weekend, too. There was definitely something fishy about their roster in that it seemed to change mid-tournament. I am not going to quibble about players being pulled up or down. If it's allowed it's allowed, whether it seems fair to me or not. Besides every team who can does it. Not sure why people are fixated about SYC on this issue when other clubs do it all the time. But I really don't understand how a team can add players mid-tournament, which is what clearly happened. My kid's team has played SYC many times and we happened to see an early game. They had several new players in the later games (and it is reflected in the outcomes).

SYC has a lot of strong players. Nothing bad to say about the kids. I have a kid in a different age group and I think that SYC team is excellent as well and seems very well-trained and coached. But I need to second that the behavior of parents this weekend was strange and obnoxious. I would never let me kids try out for SYC after this weekend.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Leaving SYC this year and not the only one. Many other parents are also in process and some are simply hanging in with the illusion that their DS or DD will move up. There is no practice space and player development is minimal. Time to leave a sinking ship.


There is a nearby club looking for more players.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:My kid's team played SYC 07 this weekend, too. There was definitely something fishy about their roster in that it seemed to change mid-tournament. I am not going to quibble about players being pulled up or down. If it's allowed it's allowed, whether it seems fair to me or not. Besides every team who can does it. Not sure why people are fixated about SYC on this issue when other clubs do it all the time. But I really don't understand how a team can add players mid-tournament, which is what clearly happened. My kid's team has played SYC many times and we happened to see an early game. They had several new players in the later games (and it is reflected in the outcomes).

SYC has a lot of strong players. Nothing bad to say about the kids. I have a kid in a different age group and I think that SYC team is excellent as well and seems very well-trained and coached. But I need to second that the behavior of parents this weekend was strange and obnoxious. I would never let me kids try out for SYC after this weekend.


There was a very fishy result in the bottom bracket for this age group on the boys side. DS is on the Bridge team. They lost 2-1 to the SYC team after leading 1-0 and there was nothing between the teams--SYC got a late goal to win it from the great individual play of #40. Then my DS team lost 1-0 to a team that SYC beat 8-0. There was no way there was that much of a gulf between any of those teams after watching them. Then Sunday SYC struggled to beat the Arlington team 2-1 and son's team beat them 3-0 -- it was the only match of the weekend that wasn't that competitive. The 8-0 stands out as totally suspect.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid's team played SYC 07 this weekend, too. There was definitely something fishy about their roster in that it seemed to change mid-tournament. I am not going to quibble about players being pulled up or down. If it's allowed it's allowed, whether it seems fair to me or not. Besides every team who can does it. Not sure why people are fixated about SYC on this issue when other clubs do it all the time. But I really don't understand how a team can add players mid-tournament, which is what clearly happened. My kid's team has played SYC many times and we happened to see an early game. They had several new players in the later games (and it is reflected in the outcomes).

SYC has a lot of strong players. Nothing bad to say about the kids. I have a kid in a different age group and I think that SYC team is excellent as well and seems very well-trained and coached. But I need to second that the behavior of parents this weekend was strange and obnoxious. I would never let me kids try out for SYC after this weekend.


There was a very fishy result in the bottom bracket for this age group on the boys side. DS is on the Bridge team. They lost 2-1 to the SYC team after leading 1-0 and there was nothing between the teams--SYC got a late goal to win it from the great individual play of #40. Then my DS team lost 1-0 to a team that SYC beat 8-0. There was no way there was that much of a gulf between any of those teams after watching them. Then Sunday SYC struggled to beat the Arlington team 2-1 and son's team beat them 3-0 -- it was the only match of the weekend that wasn't that competitive. The 8-0 stands out as totally suspect.


Unless you are standing on the sidelines with a roster in hand accounting for every player during every game, you have no idea who was or was not present for any one game. All the assumptions about nefarious or questionable outcomes is simply sad, especially when you're talking about the bottom bracket of an 07 age group. Good grief!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid's team played SYC 07 this weekend, too. There was definitely something fishy about their roster in that it seemed to change mid-tournament. I am not going to quibble about players being pulled up or down. If it's allowed it's allowed, whether it seems fair to me or not. Besides every team who can does it. Not sure why people are fixated about SYC on this issue when other clubs do it all the time. But I really don't understand how a team can add players mid-tournament, which is what clearly happened. My kid's team has played SYC many times and we happened to see an early game. They had several new players in the later games (and it is reflected in the outcomes).

SYC has a lot of strong players. Nothing bad to say about the kids. I have a kid in a different age group and I think that SYC team is excellent as well and seems very well-trained and coached. But I need to second that the behavior of parents this weekend was strange and obnoxious. I would never let me kids try out for SYC after this weekend.


There was a very fishy result in the bottom bracket for this age group on the boys side. DS is on the Bridge team. They lost 2-1 to the SYC team after leading 1-0 and there was nothing between the teams--SYC got a late goal to win it from the great individual play of #40. Then my DS team lost 1-0 to a team that SYC beat 8-0. There was no way there was that much of a gulf between any of those teams after watching them. Then Sunday SYC struggled to beat the Arlington team 2-1 and son's team beat them 3-0 -- it was the only match of the weekend that wasn't that competitive. The 8-0 stands out as totally suspect.


Unless you are standing on the sidelines with a roster in hand accounting for every player during every game, you have no idea who was or was not present for any one game. All the assumptions about nefarious or questionable outcomes is simply sad, especially when you're talking about the bottom bracket of an 07 age group. Good grief!


The official didn't check rosters at all before any of the matches. And for the 8-0 it's just as possible the team that lost was making mid-tournament roster adjustments, too.
In any case, I really hope it doesn't happen anywhere. If it does, how do those kids' parents allow it happen?
Anonymous
Bc they want to say that their kid won 8-0 over the weekend.
Anonymous
Tryna keep pace with the Samba Boyz. Maybe that coach led the team in the 8-0.
Anonymous
imagine hyping yourselves because of the Virginian

why don't ya'll hype yourselves better coaching coverage?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid's team played SYC 07 this weekend, too. There was definitely something fishy about their roster in that it seemed to change mid-tournament. I am not going to quibble about players being pulled up or down. If it's allowed it's allowed, whether it seems fair to me or not. Besides every team who can does it. Not sure why people are fixated about SYC on this issue when other clubs do it all the time. But I really don't understand how a team can add players mid-tournament, which is what clearly happened. My kid's team has played SYC many times and we happened to see an early game. They had several new players in the later games (and it is reflected in the outcomes).

SYC has a lot of strong players. Nothing bad to say about the kids. I have a kid in a different age group and I think that SYC team is excellent as well and seems very well-trained and coached. But I need to second that the behavior of parents this weekend was strange and obnoxious. I would never let me kids try out for SYC after this weekend.


There was a very fishy result in the bottom bracket for this age group on the boys side. DS is on the Bridge team. They lost 2-1 to the SYC team after leading 1-0 and there was nothing between the teams--SYC got a late goal to win it from the great individual play of #40. Then my DS team lost 1-0 to a team that SYC beat 8-0. There was no way there was that much of a gulf between any of those teams after watching them. Then Sunday SYC struggled to beat the Arlington team 2-1 and son's team beat them 3-0 -- it was the only match of the weekend that wasn't that competitive. The 8-0 stands out as totally suspect.


Surprised you guys are just figuring this stuff out.
SYC coaches are known to do funny stuff with rosters, especially in league play.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:My kid's team played SYC 07 this weekend, too. There was definitely something fishy about their roster in that it seemed to change mid-tournament. I am not going to quibble about players being pulled up or down. If it's allowed it's allowed, whether it seems fair to me or not. Besides every team who can does it. Not sure why people are fixated about SYC on this issue when other clubs do it all the time. But I really don't understand how a team can add players mid-tournament, which is what clearly happened. My kid's team has played SYC many times and we happened to see an early game. They had several new players in the later games (and it is reflected in the outcomes).

SYC has a lot of strong players. Nothing bad to say about the kids. I have a kid in a different age group and I think that SYC team is excellent as well and seems very well-trained and coached. But I need to second that the behavior of parents this weekend was strange and obnoxious. I would never let me kids try out for SYC after this weekend.


There was a very fishy result in the bottom bracket for this age group on the boys side. DS is on the Bridge team. They lost 2-1 to the SYC team after leading 1-0 and there was nothing between the teams--SYC got a late goal to win it from the great individual play of #40. Then my DS team lost 1-0 to a team that SYC beat 8-0. There was no way there was that much of a gulf between any of those teams after watching them. Then Sunday SYC struggled to beat the Arlington team 2-1 and son's team beat them 3-0 -- it was the only match of the weekend that wasn't that competitive. The 8-0 stands out as totally suspect.


Surprised you guys are just figuring this stuff out.
SYC coaches are known to do funny stuff with rosters, especially in league play.


Ok keyboard warrior. Nothing like some dip sh$t posting anonymous, incendiary allegations about an entire club. So sad.
post reply Forum Index » Soccer
Message Quick Reply
Go to: