Wootton Announces They Have Formally Retained Silverman & Thompson

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Insane that some people seem to literally think MCPS and its PR team would waste their time on this forum. The board and Taylor are living rent free in your paranoid little heads.

Actually, MCPS does post on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.

Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.

So you're saying they lost their status already?

https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Insane that some people seem to literally think MCPS and its PR team would waste their time on this forum. The board and Taylor are living rent free in your paranoid little heads.

Actually, MCPS does post on DCUM.

Whatever you say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.

What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?

They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.

Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.

So you're saying they lost their status already?

https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab

What’s the name?

[Anonymous]

The Wootton PTSA is not current.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.

What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?

They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.

And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.

What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?

They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.

And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars

If you look at the save Wootton leadership it’s not even Wootton current to soon to be families.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.

What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?

They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.

And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars

If you look at the save Wootton leadership it’s not even Wootton current to soon to be families.

No, it’s people concerned about their property values. That’s it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.

What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?

They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.

And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars

If you look at the save Wootton leadership it’s not even Wootton current to soon to be families.

No, it’s people concerned about their property values. That’s it.

Who controls the slush fund they've been collecting? I don't see any names listed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.

Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.

So you're saying they lost their status already?

https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab

What’s the name?

CEPA — Community and Education Policy Alliance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something was already filed last month.
And the org is registered.

Yawn. Please stop talking if you have no idea what you are talking about.

So you're saying they lost their status already?

https://onestop.md.gov/list_views/62f3e1797f7e3200016a3dab

What’s the name?

CEPA — Community and Education Policy Alliance

They never had charity status to begin with, they are still in the application phase.

[Anonymous]

Why do any of you care? Serious question. Yall are on this thread continuously crashing out over something yall claim have zero merit, going as far as saying parents are pocketing donations. How about just not caring and living your own lives?

I don’t have a dog in the fight but I can see why some parents are upset, and they have every right to file a lawsuit. Good for them!

Just let this play out. Dont know why yall are so bothered all the time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why do any of you care? Serious question. Yall are on this thread continuously crashing out over something yall claim have zero merit, going as far as saying parents are pocketing donations. How about just not caring and living your own lives?

I don’t have a dog in the fight but I can see why some parents are upset, and they have every right to file a lawsuit. Good for them!

Just let this play out. Dont know why yall are so bothered all the time.

I think many of us are bothered that these people keep crying about mismanagement of money and then do crap like this that forces MCPS to further waste money. What's worse is that they KNOW this is a loser of a case and just intend to drag it out and force the county to spend more. It makes them look terribly selfish and furthers the belief that they don't give a rat's ass about any kids except their own who, not for nothing, aren't actually being harmed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused by what would even occur in a court case about this. Not being happy with an MCPS decision isn’t the same thing as the decision being illegal. Thinking that the decision isn’t fair because it lowers property centers isn’t the same thing as being illegal.

What about the decision making process was illegal according to the folks who have retained the lawyers?

They don't expect to win on the merits. They want to try to delay things long enough to convince MCPS that it is easier to give in. It is easier to implement policies that affect poor kids because their parents don't have money to throw at lawyers.

And the rest of us HATE the Wootton families already, for wasting money needed for things other than legal fees on this nonsense: you wanted a new school, you got a new school. It's just 3 miles down the road, so get over yourselves and stop wasting our tax dollars

Stage 2: Anger