Israeli war crimes

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences. Nothing complicated.

Of course you don't. Genocide is good. Being a baby killer is okay. Nothing complicated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of us under 80 years old, has there ever been a more vivid litmus test of others in our lifetime than whether or not they support Israel’s policies and actions?

To answer your question from a previous post:

Palestine has done more to show who people really are than any other world event in our lifetime.

You want to know how someone would behave in Nazi Germany? Well congratulations you no longer have to wonder.

The last 20 months have done more to define someone's political ideology than every other year of their life combined.

Speaking up against the mass slaughter of children and being anti-genocide, should be the absolute MINIMUM that is expected.

If your politics can't even reach the lowest of low bars, then your politics are worth nothing.

THIS

[Anonymous]

The problem is not Netanyahu or the government alone that are evil and genocidal.

As former prime minster Ehud Olmert said, the true enemies of his country are “Israelis who think they can expel Palestinians and annex territories.” which is basically a very large majority of the population based on recent polls.

That's also why the majority of the Israeli public doesn't care for any reporting about Gaza based on another pool from Haartez

[Anonymous]

The Israeli occupation forces arrested child Mustafa Alaa Qandah (9 years old) after brutally assaulting him in the village of Abu Shukheidim, north of Ramallah.

Just a reminder that Israel is the only country that can imprison children and hold them indefinitely.

https://x.com/InesStories99/status/1933246509220290763

[Anonymous]

I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences.

Nothing complicated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences.

Nothing complicated.

Genocide is not a war crime. What thoughtful and enlightening analysis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences. Nothing complicated.

Of course you don't. Genocide is good. Being a baby killer is okay. Nothing complicated.

Correct hamas started it Israel will finish it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences. Nothing complicated.

Of course you don't. Genocide is good. Being a baby killer is okay. Nothing complicated.

Correct hamas started it Israel will finish it

Thanks genocide apologist. Be proud of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences.

Nothing complicated.

Genocide is not a war crime. What thoughtful and enlightening analysis.

It’s not genocide. When you immediately jump to superlatives, you’re preventing any real discussion of what’s really happening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences.

Nothing complicated.

Genocide is not a war crime. What thoughtful and enlightening analysis.

It’s not genocide. When you immediately jump to superlatives, you’re preventing any real discussion of what’s really happening.

This is their goal. They use terms like genocide, fascist, racist, nazi, etc precisely to shut down discussion. They do this because they cannot debate on the merits of an issue. For this issue, they do it to ignore the fact that Hamas began the whole thing with their slaughter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences.

Nothing complicated.

Genocide is not a war crime. What thoughtful and enlightening analysis.

Self-defense is not "genocide", no matter how the losers and their sympathizers choose to characterize their inability to prevail in the conflict they started on Oct. 7.

[Anonymous]

The fake charge of “genocide” fuels
real violence against Jews in America. A couple
shot at a Jewish museum in DC? This is where anti-Semitic blood libel leads. The keffiyah Nazis have to go

[Anonymous]

It is not anti-Islamic to criticize terrorism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see no "war crimes". Hamas started a war, and refuses to end it, no matter how many co-religionists perish in the aftermath. There are consequences.

Nothing complicated.

Genocide is not a war crime. What thoughtful and enlightening analysis.

Self-defense is not "genocide", no matter how the losers and their sympathizers choose to characterize their inability to prevail in the conflict they started on Oct. 7.

Netanyahu is a depopulationist. He loves war, even when his own citizens die.

[Anonymous]

The Palestinian president of West Bank where most Palestinians live criticizes Hamas all the time and it gets ignored. He literally called Hamas “sons of dogs/b’s” (which if you know Arabic is a worse insult than in English).

Does anybody care? No.

Israel still considers him Hamas too. Literally anyone who criticizes Israel is Hana’s including hostage families who want their kids back and criticize Netanyahu. They’re also called Hamas. It’s unbelievable.

Israel has lost its marbles