Private Schools Wokeness Over the Top

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hong Kong may be wishing England was back. Hasn’t been
so good for them recently.

Dimwit it was a 100 year lease from China. At the end of 100 years, it reverted to China in 1998. Eventually China asserted itself as it actually owns the territory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"wokeness"
You don't even know what it means OP.

Honestly, MAGA is so dumb.

Move to Russia OP adopt their life style you will be happier or how about North Korea???

Exactly.

Anyone who writes the word work is an idiot.

No more using that word!

Ha, the woke poster has revealed himself. No more work allowed! Only idiots work 😀😀

Thank you for proving PP's point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"wokeness"
You don't even know what it means OP.

Honestly, MAGA is so dumb.

Move to Russia OP adopt their life style you will be happier or how about North Korea???

Exactly.

Anyone who writes the word work is an idiot.

No more using that word!

We can use the word “work” anymore?

OK

Making fun of a typo with another typo. Classic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

It’s about more than embracing diversity and equity. It really is o er the top breeding of social justice warriors to a ridiculous degree—only for the most privileged trust fund children who can afford it, natch. I’m a liberal btw.

Lets not go too far here. They may embrace diversity, but their entire existence is premised on helping their students avoid equitable outcomes.

Precisely. Don’t get carried away.

These schools would do much better to teach their students the truth which is that every wealthy society and sector of society has gotten there by exploiting another class or nationality or strata of people; that cheap labor is the foundation of prosperity for a minority; that historically the cheap labor has been black and brown people and women (and also poor white people); and that they are on a proving ground / training ground for becoming overlords themselves.

Not this nonsense that any Western society has ever achieved excellence while not also building on a foundation of abuse, bc it just isn’t true.

No no no.

Much more manipulative and powerful to never teach context or ways of the times or what was paralleling in Asia or the Incas or tribal Africa and solely focus on Evil Whites who Came to North America. They invented slavery and indentured servitude and crop sharing and economics and trade and the caste system and bloodline royalty and taxes and schooling. None of that existed anywhere in any society ever before. Certainly not for 1000s or years everywhere else. And certainly no where today….

Great point.

The Aztecs were essentially the Nazis of the 15th century. So when a few years ago the new (far left) Mexican President came to power and asked Spain for historic apologies and reparations for having conquered Mexico, you know what happened?

Many non-Aztec Mexican groups attacked the President. Why? Because it was THEM, with just some aid by the newbies, who had defeated the Nazi Aztecs who had killed thousands and thousands of their children and enslaved thousands and thousands more.

You won't learn in US textbooks oh no.

US textbooks should cover atrocities committed by indigenous residents of 15th century Mexico?

I learned all this in middle school Spanish class.

About 95% of Hispanics indentify as white.

In the last census something 45% Hispanics identified as white, and 45% as mixed white/ indigenous.

And no, this isn't the result of massive rape. After a couple of decades Spain recognized indigenous tribes as citizens, same as any other citizen of the kingdoms in Spain, and encouraged interracial marriage.

Imagine if the population of today's USA was 45% white and 45% mixed white/ indigenous (also implying very little historic slavery). We would have had several Presidents with indigenous roots.

Why didn’t the indigenous people thrive enough to have 1 billion people by 1400s like they did in India and China by then? The numbers, advancements and technology were never there.

You think those countries had a billion people in 1400?

And what happened to both India and China once the British got involved?

Last I checked China was a sovereign state for like 2000 years. Brits never colonized China. Only Hong Kong.

China wasn't very sovereign in the 1920s and 1930s. That's why there were numerous foreign settlements in China.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

It’s about more than embracing diversity and equity. It really is o er the top breeding of social justice warriors to a ridiculous degree—only for the most privileged trust fund children who can afford it, natch. I’m a liberal btw.

Lets not go too far here. They may embrace diversity, but their entire existence is premised on helping their students avoid equitable outcomes.

Precisely. Don’t get carried away.

These schools would do much better to teach their students the truth which is that every wealthy society and sector of society has gotten there by exploiting another class or nationality or strata of people; that cheap labor is the foundation of prosperity for a minority; that historically the cheap labor has been black and brown people and women (and also poor white people); and that they are on a proving ground / training ground for becoming overlords themselves.

Not this nonsense that any Western society has ever achieved excellence while not also building on a foundation of abuse, bc it just isn’t true.

No no no.

Much more manipulative and powerful to never teach context or ways of the times or what was paralleling in Asia or the Incas or tribal Africa and solely focus on Evil Whites who Came to North America. They invented slavery and indentured servitude and crop sharing and economics and trade and the caste system and bloodline royalty and taxes and schooling. None of that existed anywhere in any society ever before. Certainly not for 1000s or years everywhere else. And certainly no where today….

Great point.

The Aztecs were essentially the Nazis of the 15th century. So when a few years ago the new (far left) Mexican President came to power and asked Spain for historic apologies and reparations for having conquered Mexico, you know what happened?

Many non-Aztec Mexican groups attacked the President. Why? Because it was THEM, with just some aid by the newbies, who had defeated the Nazi Aztecs who had killed thousands and thousands of their children and enslaved thousands and thousands more.

You won't learn in US textbooks oh no.

US textbooks should cover atrocities committed by indigenous residents of 15th century Mexico?

I learned all this in middle school Spanish class.

About 95% of Hispanics indentify as white.

In the last census something 45% Hispanics identified as white, and 45% as mixed white/ indigenous.

And no, this isn't the result of massive rape. After a couple of decades Spain recognized indigenous tribes as citizens, same as any other citizen of the kingdoms in Spain, and encouraged interracial marriage.

Imagine if the population of today's USA was 45% white and 45% mixed white/ indigenous (also implying very little historic slavery). We would have had several Presidents with indigenous roots.

Why didn’t the indigenous people thrive enough to have 1 billion people by 1400s like they did in India and China by then? The numbers, advancements and technology were never there.

You think those countries had a billion people in 1400?

And what happened to both India and China once the British got involved?

Last I checked China was a sovereign state for like 2000 years. Brits never colonized China. Only Hong Kong.

China wasn't very sovereign in the 1920s and 1930s. That's why there were numerous foreign settlements in China.

Let me amend that to say it really got going in the 1850s:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concessions_in_China

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"wokeness"
You don't even know what it means OP.

Honestly, MAGA is so dumb.

Move to Russia OP adopt their life style you will be happier or how about North Korea???

Exactly.

Anyone who writes the word work is an idiot.

No more using that word!

We can use the word “work” anymore?

OK

Apple made sure to autocorrect the word woke into work. Awesome. And ironic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"wokeness"
You don't even know what it means OP.

Honestly, MAGA is so dumb.

Move to Russia OP adopt their life style you will be happier or how about North Korea???

Exactly.

Anyone who writes the word work is an idiot.

No more using that word!

Ha, the woke poster has revealed himself. No more work allowed! Only idiots work 😀😀

Double entendre!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

It’s about more than embracing diversity and equity. It really is o er the top breeding of social justice warriors to a ridiculous degree—only for the most privileged trust fund children who can afford it, natch. I’m a liberal btw.

Lets not go too far here. They may embrace diversity, but their entire existence is premised on helping their students avoid equitable outcomes.

Precisely. Don’t get carried away.

These schools would do much better to teach their students the truth which is that every wealthy society and sector of society has gotten there by exploiting another class or nationality or strata of people; that cheap labor is the foundation of prosperity for a minority; that historically the cheap labor has been black and brown people and women (and also poor white people); and that they are on a proving ground / training ground for becoming overlords themselves.

Not this nonsense that any Western society has ever achieved excellence while not also building on a foundation of abuse, bc it just isn’t true.

No no no.

Much more manipulative and powerful to never teach context or ways of the times or what was paralleling in Asia or the Incas or tribal Africa and solely focus on Evil Whites who Came to North America. They invented slavery and indentured servitude and crop sharing and economics and trade and the caste system and bloodline royalty and taxes and schooling. None of that existed anywhere in any society ever before. Certainly not for 1000s or years everywhere else. And certainly no where today….

Great point.

The Aztecs were essentially the Nazis of the 15th century. So when a few years ago the new (far left) Mexican President came to power and asked Spain for historic apologies and reparations for having conquered Mexico, you know what happened?

Many non-Aztec Mexican groups attacked the President. Why? Because it was THEM, with just some aid by the newbies, who had defeated the Nazi Aztecs who had killed thousands and thousands of their children and enslaved thousands and thousands more.

You won't learn in US textbooks oh no.

US textbooks should cover atrocities committed by indigenous residents of 15th century Mexico?

I learned all this in middle school Spanish class.

About 95% of Hispanics indentify as white.

In the last census something 45% Hispanics identified as white, and 45% as mixed white/ indigenous.

And no, this isn't the result of massive rape. After a couple of decades Spain recognized indigenous tribes as citizens, same as any other citizen of the kingdoms in Spain, and encouraged interracial marriage.

Imagine if the population of today's USA was 45% white and 45% mixed white/ indigenous (also implying very little historic slavery). We would have had several Presidents with indigenous roots.

Why didn’t the indigenous people thrive enough to have 1 billion people by 1400s like they did in India and China by then? The numbers, advancements and technology were never there.

You think those countries had a billion people in 1400?

And what happened to both India and China once the British got involved?

Yes. Look it up and learn something else than US victimization

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

It’s about more than embracing diversity and equity. It really is o er the top breeding of social justice warriors to a ridiculous degree—only for the most privileged trust fund children who can afford it, natch. I’m a liberal btw.

Lets not go too far here. They may embrace diversity, but their entire existence is premised on helping their students avoid equitable outcomes.

Precisely. Don’t get carried away.

These schools would do much better to teach their students the truth which is that every wealthy society and sector of society has gotten there by exploiting another class or nationality or strata of people; that cheap labor is the foundation of prosperity for a minority; that historically the cheap labor has been black and brown people and women (and also poor white people); and that they are on a proving ground / training ground for becoming overlords themselves.

Not this nonsense that any Western society has ever achieved excellence while not also building on a foundation of abuse, bc it just isn’t true.

No no no.

Much more manipulative and powerful to never teach context or ways of the times or what was paralleling in Asia or the Incas or tribal Africa and solely focus on Evil Whites who Came to North America. They invented slavery and indentured servitude and crop sharing and economics and trade and the caste system and bloodline royalty and taxes and schooling. None of that existed anywhere in any society ever before. Certainly not for 1000s or years everywhere else. And certainly no where today….

Great point.

The Aztecs were essentially the Nazis of the 15th century. So when a few years ago the new (far left) Mexican President came to power and asked Spain for historic apologies and reparations for having conquered Mexico, you know what happened?

Many non-Aztec Mexican groups attacked the President. Why? Because it was THEM, with just some aid by the newbies, who had defeated the Nazi Aztecs who had killed thousands and thousands of their children and enslaved thousands and thousands more.

You won't learn in US textbooks oh no.

US textbooks should cover atrocities committed by indigenous residents of 15th century Mexico?

I learned all this in middle school Spanish class.

About 95% of Hispanics indentify as white.

In the last census something 45% Hispanics identified as white, and 45% as mixed white/ indigenous.

And no, this isn't the result of massive rape. After a couple of decades Spain recognized indigenous tribes as citizens, same as any other citizen of the kingdoms in Spain, and encouraged interracial marriage.

Imagine if the population of today's USA was 45% white and 45% mixed white/ indigenous (also implying very little historic slavery). We would have had several Presidents with indigenous roots.

Why didn’t the indigenous people thrive enough to have 1 billion people by 1400s like they did in India and China by then? The numbers, advancements and technology were never there.

You think those countries had a billion people in 1400?

And what happened to both India and China once the British got involved?

Last I checked China was a sovereign state for like 2000 years. Brits never colonized China. Only Hong Kong.

My friend, look up the century of humiliation. China is still reacting to that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

It’s about more than embracing diversity and equity. It really is o er the top breeding of social justice warriors to a ridiculous degree—only for the most privileged trust fund children who can afford it, natch. I’m a liberal btw.

Lets not go too far here. They may embrace diversity, but their entire existence is premised on helping their students avoid equitable outcomes.

Precisely. Don’t get carried away.

These schools would do much better to teach their students the truth which is that every wealthy society and sector of society has gotten there by exploiting another class or nationality or strata of people; that cheap labor is the foundation of prosperity for a minority; that historically the cheap labor has been black and brown people and women (and also poor white people); and that they are on a proving ground / training ground for becoming overlords themselves.

Not this nonsense that any Western society has ever achieved excellence while not also building on a foundation of abuse, bc it just isn’t true.

No no no.

Much more manipulative and powerful to never teach context or ways of the times or what was paralleling in Asia or the Incas or tribal Africa and solely focus on Evil Whites who Came to North America. They invented slavery and indentured servitude and crop sharing and economics and trade and the caste system and bloodline royalty and taxes and schooling. None of that existed anywhere in any society ever before. Certainly not for 1000s or years everywhere else. And certainly no where today….

Great point.

The Aztecs were essentially the Nazis of the 15th century. So when a few years ago the new (far left) Mexican President came to power and asked Spain for historic apologies and reparations for having conquered Mexico, you know what happened?

Many non-Aztec Mexican groups attacked the President. Why? Because it was THEM, with just some aid by the newbies, who had defeated the Nazi Aztecs who had killed thousands and thousands of their children and enslaved thousands and thousands more.

You won't learn in US textbooks oh no.

US textbooks should cover atrocities committed by indigenous residents of 15th century Mexico?

I learned all this in middle school Spanish class.

About 95% of Hispanics indentify as white.

In the last census something 45% Hispanics identified as white, and 45% as mixed white/ indigenous.

And no, this isn't the result of massive rape. After a couple of decades Spain recognized indigenous tribes as citizens, same as any other citizen of the kingdoms in Spain, and encouraged interracial marriage.

Imagine if the population of today's USA was 45% white and 45% mixed white/ indigenous (also implying very little historic slavery). We would have had several Presidents with indigenous roots.

Why didn’t the indigenous people thrive enough to have 1 billion people by 1400s like they did in India and China by then? The numbers, advancements and technology were never there.

You think those countries had a billion people in 1400?

And what happened to both India and China once the British got involved?

Yes. Look it up and learn something else than US victimization

Well after that look up how the US treated the Philippines.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"wokeness"
You don't even know what it means OP.

Honestly, MAGA is so dumb.

Move to Russia OP adopt their life style you will be happier or how about North Korea???

Exactly.

Anyone who writes the word work is an idiot.

No more using that word!

Ha, the woke poster has revealed himself. No more work allowed! Only idiots work 😀😀

Double entendre!

Freudian slip of the tongue

[Anonymous]

The whole anti woke movement is driven by marginally successful whites who no longer can get slots at Ivy League schools. Bitter demographic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

I don't get why people insist on using that word. The majority of Hispanics hate it. My husband who is an immigrant from Latin America says it us another instance of gringos telling them what to do. He finds it offensive.

It’s beyond diversity and equity. Its a religion

And for Sidwell at least "equity and diversity" is about African Americans. Asian Americans. Latinx, Hispanic Americans are not in the picture for the administration, as much as they pay lip service to them.

Good point but don't use that Latinx thingy. Most Hispanics hate it and see it as an insult by detached anglo wokes.

This is actually true. It’s a gendered language and a gendered culture and the Latinx thing is stupid given that the entire language has male and female nouns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The whole anti woke movement is driven by marginally successful whites who no longer can get slots at Ivy League schools. Bitter demographic.

As opposed to people who wouldn’t get in at all on a merit-based system?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a parent from a foreign background, this article resonated with me. I feel lost here and feel like I no longer fit in.

https://www.slowboring.com/p/who-is-included-by-inclusive-language

The author of the article cites a few Washington DC schools:
“Georgetown Day and Sidwell Friends here in D.C..”

It doesn’t seem like any of these schools hide the fact that they embrace diversity and equity , etc. I think it’s great that many schools are embracing these things. If a person doesn’t like a school’s ideologies they can obviously pick other schools..

It’s about more than embracing diversity and equity. It really is o er the top breeding of social justice warriors to a ridiculous degree—only for the most privileged trust fund children who can afford it, natch. I’m a liberal btw.

Lets not go too far here. They may embrace diversity, but their entire existence is premised on helping their students avoid equitable outcomes.

Precisely. Don’t get carried away.

These schools would do much better to teach their students the truth which is that every wealthy society and sector of society has gotten there by exploiting another class or nationality or strata of people; that cheap labor is the foundation of prosperity for a minority; that historically the cheap labor has been black and brown people and women (and also poor white people); and that they are on a proving ground / training ground for becoming overlords themselves.

Not this nonsense that any Western society has ever achieved excellence while not also building on a foundation of abuse, bc it just isn’t true.

No no no.

Much more manipulative and powerful to never teach context or ways of the times or what was paralleling in Asia or the Incas or tribal Africa and solely focus on Evil Whites who Came to North America. They invented slavery and indentured servitude and crop sharing and economics and trade and the caste system and bloodline royalty and taxes and schooling. None of that existed anywhere in any society ever before. Certainly not for 1000s or years everywhere else. And certainly no where today….

Great point.

The Aztecs were essentially the Nazis of the 15th century. So when a few years ago the new (far left) Mexican President came to power and asked Spain for historic apologies and reparations for having conquered Mexico, you know what happened?

Many non-Aztec Mexican groups attacked the President. Why? Because it was THEM, with just some aid by the newbies, who had defeated the Nazi Aztecs who had killed thousands and thousands of their children and enslaved thousands and thousands more.

You won't learn in US textbooks oh no.

US textbooks should cover atrocities committed by indigenous residents of 15th century Mexico?

I learned all this in middle school Spanish class.

About 95% of Hispanics indentify as white.

In the last census something 45% Hispanics identified as white, and 45% as mixed white/ indigenous.

And no, this isn't the result of massive rape. After a couple of decades Spain recognized indigenous tribes as citizens, same as any other citizen of the kingdoms in Spain, and encouraged interracial marriage.

Imagine if the population of today's USA was 45% white and 45% mixed white/ indigenous (also implying very little historic slavery). We would have had several Presidents with indigenous roots.

Why didn’t the indigenous people thrive enough to have 1 billion people by 1400s like they did in India and China by then? The numbers, advancements and technology were never there.

You think those countries had a billion people in 1400?

And what happened to both India and China once the British got involved?

Last I checked China was a sovereign state for like 2000 years. Brits never colonized China. Only Hong Kong.

My friend, look up the century of humiliation. China is still reacting to that.

What did China ever say after the WW II Pacific war when USA fishy off Japan, who had already invaded China?