US Capitol Breached by Trump's lunatics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:our country is done

I see some light at the end of a long tunnel.

Woohoo! The insurrection was only minor and we can move on!

No, that's not how failed coups work. Hundreds of J6ers have seen/are seeing prison time. As they should.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free at last!

MSM should finally admit their lies and deceptions that divide American people.

[Anonymous]

There is a federal law against rioting with pretty hard penalties. I guess Garland thinks that is a bridge too for tourists who got lost?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:our country is done

I see some light at the end of a long tunnel.

Woohoo! The insurrection was only minor and we can move on!

No, that's not how failed coups work. Hundreds of J6ers have seen/are seeing prison time. As they should.

When will the mass arrest of DOJ employees start? SCOTUS will not come to your aid.

[Anonymous]

Wow the SC sucks

[Anonymous]

Anyone else struck by the deep contradictions from Trump last night, on one hand refusing to denounce the J6 seditionists, saying they were innocent harmless patriots, but at the same time saying "IT WAS PELOSI'S FAULT!"

Make that make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow the SC sucks

J6 was fine fine.

Nothing to see here. 🔥🔥🔥

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m not sure what to make of this.

Ok, so if I play along with this...
So if the J6ers were all just completely harmless tourists who were waved in and didn't do anything wrong then what does it matter if it was "Pelosi's fault?"

[Anonymous]

Or if it WAS Pelosi's fault then why does she want "her" J6'ers arrested and accountable?

It makes ZERO sense.

Engage some logic. Pick a swim lane, people. It's either one or the other. Cannot be both.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is a federal law against rioting with pretty hard penalties. I guess Garland thinks that is a bridge too for tourists who got lost?

No, Garland doesn't believe in that law because he doesn't prosecute leftists for rioting. He's only interested in punishing his political enemies. Also, the same people who say Trump isn't qualified because he was impeached never apply that standard to Garland. Hypocritical liars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:our country is done

So interesting how the "textualists" keep putting words into statutes that aren't actually there when it fits their preferred political outcome.

I said on another thread that Republicans especially suck because to them words have no meaning and this is a good example. “Textualist” and “originalist” mean whatever they want it to mean in the moment that they say it. Republicans are not bound by decency and haven’t been for a long, long time.

What is the purpose of such a decision? It’s a signal to the most disgusting elements in our country that the corrupted Supreme Court will green light anything that the GOP does, up to and including insurrection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the SC sucks

J6 was fine fine.

Nothing to see here. 🔥🔥🔥

If J6 were as bad as claimed, they would have released all the video. They wouldn't have had to lie about the deaths from J6. They would have not covered up the murder of the protestor. The Dems feared sunshine because they were lying, including with the planted pipe bomb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the SC sucks

J6 was fine fine.

Nothing to see here. 🔥🔥🔥

If J6 were as bad as claimed, they would have released all the video. They wouldn't have had to lie about the deaths from J6. They would have not covered up the murder of the protestor. The Dems feared sunshine because they were lying, including with the planted pipe bomb.

"Release the video" WTF are you talking about it. We all watched it in real time with our own eyes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the SC sucks

J6 was fine fine.

Nothing to see here. 🔥🔥🔥

If J6 were as bad as claimed, they would have released all the video. They wouldn't have had to lie about the deaths from J6. They would have not covered up the murder of the protestor. The Dems feared sunshine because they were lying, including with the planted pipe bomb.

"Release the video" WTF are you talking about it. We all watched it in real time with our own eyes.

You don't even know because you only believe what the MSM tells you. There are thousands of hours of video that were not released, especially as part of the Star Chamber presentation put on by Dems.

You only know what the tv tells you. Must be a Boomer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow the SC sucks

J6 was fine fine.

Nothing to see here. 🔥🔥🔥

If J6 were as bad as claimed, they would have released all the video. They wouldn't have had to lie about the deaths from J6. They would have not covered up the murder of the protestor. The Dems feared sunshine because they were lying, including with the planted pipe bomb.