Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

Anonymous
So we now learn that Alex Cannon, a Trump lawyer, advised his client to return the 24 MAL boxes to NARA “as is” do the professional archivists could sort out the mess. Trump instead searched the boxes himself and told the lawyer to make the representation that everything had been returned. The lawyer wisely declined to do so.

We also know that the MAL boxes include materials that post-date 1/20/2021, which is evidence that their contents were handled subsequent to his leaving office.

Making the crime-fraud exception great again.
Anonymous
Trump had a lawyer named Alex Cannon -- no relation to Judge Aileen Cannon, though?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Trump had a lawyer named Alex Cannon -- no relation to Judge Aileen Cannon, though?


Lawyer - Alex Cannon
Judge - Aileen Cannon
Trump - Loose Cannon

I'm seeing the connection here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump had a lawyer named Alex Cannon -- no relation to Judge Aileen Cannon, though?


Lawyer - Alex Cannon
Judge - Aileen Cannon
Trump - Loose Cannon

I'm seeing the connection here.


Don’t forget Qannon.
Anonymous
Why are people so surprised at what Trump is capable of.

He treats everything as a negotiation deal.

"I'll give you what I owe you, if you give me something that isn't mine to begin with but that I think it should be mine."

Isn't this basically blackmail? " excuse me.. this is a negotiation, and I'm the king negotiator".

Interesting that his lawyers wouldn't do what he wanted because they realized that it was illegal, but those who did do what he wanted now need legal counsel themselves.

Everyone who comes near him ends up need a lawyer, even lawyers themselves. What does that say about Trump? Stupid cult members.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-deflected-demands-documents-enmeshing-150841875.html
Anonymous
Wait I thought the FBI planted everything?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump had a lawyer named Alex Cannon -- no relation to Judge Aileen Cannon, though?


Lawyer - Alex Cannon
Judge - Aileen Cannon
Trump - Loose Cannon

I'm seeing the connection here.


Don’t forget Qannon.


And Bannon
Anonymous
@8:24...here is the way it has SUPPOSED to be done...

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why are people so surprised at what Trump is capable of.

He treats everything as a negotiation deal.

"I'll give you what I owe you, if you give me something that isn't mine to begin with but that I think it should be mine."

Isn't this basically blackmail? " excuse me.. this is a negotiation, and I'm the king negotiator".

Interesting that his lawyers wouldn't do what he wanted because they realized that it was illegal, but those who did do what he wanted now need legal counsel themselves.

Everyone who comes near him ends up need a lawyer, even lawyers themselves. What does that say about Trump? Stupid cult members.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-deflected-demands-documents-enmeshing-150841875.html

I don’t think anyone is so surprised at what Trump is willing to do; I think some are surprised at how nakedly partisan ostensibly non-partisan judges are and how much the GOP does to protect Trump while pretending that Trump is a Democratically-created problem instead of him being a monster of their own creation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why are people so surprised at what Trump is capable of.

He treats everything as a negotiation deal.

"I'll give you what I owe you, if you give me something that isn't mine to begin with but that I think it should be mine."

Isn't this basically blackmail? " excuse me.. this is a negotiation, and I'm the king negotiator".

Interesting that his lawyers wouldn't do what he wanted because they realized that it was illegal, but those who did do what he wanted now need legal counsel themselves.

Everyone who comes near him ends up need a lawyer, even lawyers themselves. What does that say about Trump? Stupid cult members.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-deflected-demands-documents-enmeshing-150841875.html

I don’t think anyone is so surprised at what Trump is willing to do; I think some are surprised at how nakedly partisan ostensibly non-partisan judges are and how much the GOP does to protect Trump while pretending that Trump is a Democratically-created problem instead of him being a monster of their own creation.


The problem is that the partisan judges and self-interested politicians help continue to normalize Trump for GOP voters. When you have a fragile, impressionable voter base, it's morally wrong to continue equivocating and obfuscating for more ratings and more funding.

Anonymous
As many of us here suspected…
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


It’s an excellent brief. It will be difficult for SCOTUS to rationalize ruling in Trump’s favor on this, to the extent they’re inclined to do so.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


It’s an excellent brief. It will be difficult for SCOTUS to rationalize ruling in Trump’s favor on this, to the extent they’re inclined to do so.



Ginni Thomas will push her vote, if they do.
Anonymous
I'd like to think the SCOTUS will stick to the law, but this court has pushed the court into political activism. I don't know how the court will rule. Thomas, et al are horrible partisans, not worthy of the SCOTUS.

Their rulings debase the honor of the court.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: