Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who keeps their calendar from 1982?
What teenage boy keeps a calendar in 1982?

Zero.

I think it's a good bet that those calendars were doctored/altered/fabricated. This a guy is a debt ridden (200k in credit card debt?) drunk, hardly a fastidious record keeper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“We found classmates had been talking about this for weeks and months since July. There'd been an email chain of Yale classmates of Kavanaugh talking about will this thing come out? long before Christine Blasey Ford came forward"

- Jane Mayer

Let’s have the FBI talk to these people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who keeps their calendar from 1982?
What teenage boy keeps a calendar in 1982?

Zero.

I think it's a good bet that those calendars were doctored/altered/fabricated. This a guy is a debt ridden (200k in credit card debt?) drunk, hardly a fastidious record keeper.

He is not stupid. There must be some old calendar that does not list this party of 5 event for what that is worth which is not much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“We found classmates had been talking about this for weeks and months since July. There'd been an email chain of Yale classmates of Kavanaugh talking about will this thing come out? long before Christine Blasey Ford came forward"

- Jane Mayer

For those saying that the New Yorker article didn't definitively have any corroborating names, or that the NYT and others didn't run this story because of the lack of corroboration, it seems more like there was a lack of anyone willing to put their name to these stories. Still is. What happens at Yale stays at Yale. Or, what happens in my social class stays in my social class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They certainly should have known about the impending smear campaign. Didn't Democrats form an organization to fight ANY nominated candidate?

Yes, they certainly did.

It's only a smear campaign if you think these allegations are false.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“We found classmates had been talking about this for weeks and months since July. There'd been an email chain of Yale classmates of Kavanaugh talking about will this thing come out? long before Christine Blasey Ford came forward"

- Jane Mayer

For those saying that the New Yorker article didn't definitively have any corroborating names, or that the NYT and others didn't run this story because of the lack of corroboration, it seems more like there was a lack of anyone willing to put their name to these stories. Still is. What happens at Yale stays at Yale. Or, what happens in my social class stays in my social class.

Whoops. Looks like they picked on a woman from the wrong circle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who keeps their calendar from 1982?
What teenage boy keeps a calendar in 1982?

More importantly, what teenage boy notes in his calendar he will be attending an illegal, impromptu kegger?

That was ridiculous. He’s looking desperate now.

What grown man still keeps his day planner from his high school years?

[Anonymous]

K is in a bind (of his own making). He should have withdrawn for the "blah blah, my family blah blah, good of the country" reasons last week - probably about when his buddy Whelan was pushing the evil twin theory. But he waited . . . and now things are looking infinitely creepier, and if he withdraws at this point folks will definitely/universally (always and forevermore) think there is (significant) substance to the (many and varied - I'm looking at you Avenetti! - allegations.

Which means he'll probably double down and go for broke. Going to be a crazy week!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who keeps their calendar from 1982?
What teenage boy keeps a calendar in 1982?

More importantly, what teenage boy notes in his calendar he will be attending an illegal, impromptu kegger?

That was ridiculous. He’s looking desperate now.

What grown man still keeps his day planner from his high school years?

The party was listed under "Private Time."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They certainly should have known about the impending smear campaign. Didn't Democrats form an organization to fight ANY nominated candidate?

Yes, they certainly did.

It's only a smear campaign if you think these allegations are false.

And the Republican effort it go about showing these allegations to be false is severely lacking.

[Anonymous]

Latest email from Avenattti (from his twitter feed)



Woo hoo!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:K is in a bind (of his own making). He should have withdrawn for the "blah blah, my family blah blah, good of the country" reasons last week - probably about when his buddy Whelan was pushing the evil twin theory. But he waited . . . and now things are looking infinitely creepier, and if he withdraws at this point folks will definitely/universally (always and forevermore) think there is (significant) substance to the (many and varied - I'm looking at you Avenetti! - allegations.

Which means he'll probably double down and go for broke. Going to be a crazy week!

At this point, an investigation into the allegations should land him in jail, not just broke. That's why he's stupid.

[Anonymous]

Why won't Ford's best friends go under oath to support her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:K is in a bind (of his own making). He should have withdrawn for the "blah blah, my family blah blah, good of the country" reasons last week - probably about when his buddy Whelan was pushing the evil twin theory. But he waited . . . and now things are looking infinitely creepier, and if he withdraws at this point folks will definitely/universally (always and forevermore) think there is (significant) substance to the (many and varied - I'm looking at you Avenetti! - allegations.

Which means he'll probably double down and go for broke. Going to be a crazy week!

Or he should have said, "In my student days I drank too much on occasion and sometimes was boorish with women. Although I have no memory of the particular allegations [or don't remember them the same way], it is clear that these women have carried a terrible burden, and I am profoundly sorry. I am a different man today, and a father with daughters. "

Then he could survive it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:K is in a bind (of his own making). He should have withdrawn for the "blah blah, my family blah blah, good of the country" reasons last week - probably about when his buddy Whelan was pushing the evil twin theory. But he waited . . . and now things are looking infinitely creepier, and if he withdraws at this point folks will definitely/universally (always and forevermore) think there is (significant) substance to the (many and varied - I'm looking at you Avenetti! - allegations.

Which means he'll probably double down and go for broke. Going to be a crazy week!

Or he should have said, "In my student days I drank too much on occasion and sometimes was boorish with women. Although I have no memory of the particular allegations [or don't remember them the same way], it is clear that these women have carried a terrible burden, and I am profoundly sorry. I am a different man today, and a father with daughters. "

Then he could survive it.

Agree. Although this 4th of July thing could be problematic. No one get to mess with the anthem or the 4th of July.