Jennifer Dulos - Connecticut mom of 5 missing

[Anonymous]

If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe they haven’t found her yet, especially because the gf appears to be cooperating. It is horrific.

I suppose if she's already been incinerated they might not find her. It must be like looking for a needle in a haystack among all of that crushed debris at the dump.

The girlfriend is not trustworthy. She could be lying to the investigators if she was involved in the murder and/or the cover up. Her goal is to get out of this and save her own neck, not to get justice for Jennifer.

+1. Also, if she knows for sure that the police will not find the body, she has no incentive to tell all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

No. That is entirely the point of reasonable doubt. You do not need to eliminate all doubt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

Yes, if you use a public defender. Apparently this guy has some money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

No. That is entirely the point of reasonable doubt. You do not need to eliminate all doubt.

I think you will find that the general public views reasonable as all doubt. After all, she could have been abducted by aliens.

[Anonymous]

What time you guys make of the loud banging heard in the middle of the night from a Fotis property under development in New Canaan 18 hours (give it take) JD went missing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What time you guys make of the loud banging heard in the middle of the night from a Fotis property under development in New Canaan 18 hours (give it take) JD went missing?

If I had to guess, I would say breaking through a concrete floor. But the police would have investigated that by now presumably.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

Yes, if you use a public defender. Apparently this guy has some money.

What possible excuse could he have for dumping garbage bags filled with Jennifer's blood into 30 different dumpsters? Because that's what he's been caught on surveillance videos doing and apparently his cell phone pings indicate that he was in fact the individual dumping those bags.

He's not getting off. No freakin' way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they don't find a body, don't expect a guilty verdict. Inevitably, some juror will believe that the woman is still alive and living on a secret island will Elvis and Bigfoot.

Not with all the blood found in the garage and her soon to be ex caught on surveillance tape dumping bags filled with items covered in her blood.

The jurors will understand that her body was probably destroyed and incinerated at the dump. There is ample evidence that she was harmed and that her soon to be ex and his girlfriend tried to cover it up. Guilty.

You really overestimate the intelligence of a hand picked jury.

All that blood could be planted by the police. DNA isn't 100%. That's _reasonable_ doubt.

DP- no. Plenty of people are found guilty without a body.

Yes, if you use a public defender. Apparently this guy has some money.

Apparently he doesn’t have any money. So, he killed his wife to get hers.

[Anonymous]

Depends on how much blood. If a certain amount of blood is found it can be established that living through it unlikely or not possible.
The narrative is to easy to imagine. It makes a step by step guilty look.

[Anonymous]

If he has enough money to to get a good lawyer, I bet he takes a plea.
If he doesn’t have the money for a good lawyer, I bet he takes a plea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Depends on how much blood. If a certain amount of blood is found it can be established that living through it unlikely or not possible.
The narrative is to easy to imagine. It makes a step by step guilty look.

Blood in the garage, as well as, blood soaked items from the crime scene would indicate that Jennifer was badly hurt. They dumped bags into *30* different dumpsters. The evidence must be overwhelming against them.