Metro United

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know you are a different poster. If you thought I was aging you were the same, I wasn't. It doesn't change the fact that you keep proving my point over and over.

What’s your point? I don’t see how anything was proven in that last exchange

That we need to tone down the aggressive posts.

Sorry, there was nothing aggressive about the exchange you referred to.

Sorry, but that you say that is exactly what's wrong with the way you post. You don't even know you are being abrasive.

I think you just don’t handle other opinions very well. This is just based on the responses. It’s not a personal thing.

Opinions are like mouths...and no, it's not personal. It IS rude.

What exactly was the rude part? Disagreeing with you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know you are a different poster. If you thought I was aging you were the same, I wasn't. It doesn't change the fact that you keep proving my point over and over.

What’s your point? I don’t see how anything was proven in that last exchange

That we need to tone down the aggressive posts.

Sorry, there was nothing aggressive about the exchange you referred to.

Argue much?

Chronically it seems.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know you are a different poster. If you thought I was aging you were the same, I wasn't. It doesn't change the fact that you keep proving my point over and over.

What’s your point? I don’t see how anything was proven in that last exchange

That we need to tone down the aggressive posts.

Sorry, there was nothing aggressive about the exchange you referred to.

Sorry, but that you say that is exactly what's wrong with the way you post. You don't even know you are being abrasive.

I think you just don’t handle other opinions very well. This is just based on the responses. It’s not a personal thing.

Opinions are like mouths...and no, it's not personal. It IS rude.

What exactly was the rude part? Disagreeing with you?

Nope. Bringing up some unrelated poster you apparently were bothered by when it had nothing to do with the subject. Defending picking apart a post based on a single pronoun that took the post out of context. Refusing to think for even a moment you may have gone too far. So on and so forth.

[Anonymous]

if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Hard to tell who to report...everyone comes up anonymous

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Hard to tell who to report...everyone comes up anonymous

Exactly. The root of the problem both in this thread and on this forum. That’s why credibility here is so low and people become skeptical of anything posted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

Actually it's more like the need to win every argument ensures it's a "he" .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

Actually it's more like the need to win every argument ensures it's a "he" .

I dunno, I’ve met females who were just as fanatical. It could go either way

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

Actually it's more like the need to win every argument ensures it's a "he" .

I dunno, I’ve met females who were just as fanatical. It could go either way

And we do know this board has a few resident zealots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

Actually it's more like the need to win every argument ensures it's a "he" .

I dunno, I’ve met females who were just as fanatical. It could go either way

He, she, the point is there is no need to dissect posts the way some have been, or to be so adamant in their interpretation. Assume a little good will, and it may be returned to you.

As for people who were unhappy with Spirit, we all know some parents with offers didn't return, so it sorts itself out in the end on its own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

Actually it's more like the need to win every argument ensures it's a "he" .

I dunno, I’ve met females who were just as fanatical. It could go either way

He, she, the point is there is no need to dissect posts the way some have been, or to be so adamant in their interpretation. Assume a little good will, and it may be returned to you.

As for people who were unhappy with Spirit, we all know some parents with offers didn't return, so it sorts itself out in the end on its own.

This is true, though my bet would be that the troublemaker is one who didn’t get an offer, got a PT offer, or has some other Spirit related gripe.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if you idiots don't STFU, I will report you.

Yes, one of the parties should be reported. The one who seems to want to pick a fight with several other posters and is likely the same troll who plagued the Spirit threads.

Agreed. He can't let a single thing go. Anything. I bet he's a gem on the sideline.

Yes. Though judging be the sensitivity to “aggressiveness” over nothing, my wager is that “he” is actually a “she”

Actually it's more like the need to win every argument ensures it's a "he" .

I dunno, I’ve met females who were just as fanatical. It could go either way

He, she, the point is there is no need to dissect posts the way some have been, or to be so adamant in their interpretation. Assume a little good will, and it may be returned to you.

As for people who were unhappy with Spirit, we all know some parents with offers didn't return, so it sorts itself out in the end on its own.

This is true, though my bet would be that the troublemaker is one who didn’t get an offer, got a PT offer, or has some other Spirit related gripe.

This person need to get a life and spend his time doing something more productive- some serious pent up anger !