Kavanaugh Accuser reveals her Identity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. What does she have to gain, she only stands to lose from this no matter what.

Lol. She'll be on Ellen's couch by weeks end. She is now the darling of angry trump hating women everywhere. So predictable.

Trump hating women? Every man I've talked to is disgusted by this. What kind of people do you spend time with? Gross.

Agree. Some people, including Republicans, are not so blindly partisan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Now that's a great point! And of course they planned it. I said first day of confirmation that if none of their BS works, me too is next.

In a way, I'm glad as the left is exposing its ugly underbelly to the American public.

Come on, Repubs knew all about this. How else did the suddenly 65 women who knew him from high school suddenly get organized to attest to his good character? They had this in their back pocket in case the assault accusation came out.

Too tin foil hat for me, bro.

Yeah, they just rounded up women who knew him at Prep (oh, wait, all boys school).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Such typically sleazy politics-of-destruction. Why didn't Feinstein share the letter during the public hearings or the private sessions afterwards, so the allegations could be discussed and considered? I'll tell you why: she's not interested in the truth or in fairness. She's trying last-minute hail-mary gotcha (though obviously planned for some time, with Feinstein "sitting there like a spider waiting to pounce.) Politics is war by other means.

Your faux outrage is exhausting. I thought Republicans loved real politik?

Where was your outrage as Russia leaked emails from Hillary's campaign staff "at the last minute"? Your complaints have zero credibility.

If the accusations are untrue, Kavanaugh has a well known remedy: suing his accuser for defamation/libel. This has been used successfully many times to restore someone's good name in the face of lies.

So Kavanaugh should sue, if she's lying.

You know who else also threatened to sue, but never did? Roy Moore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't she pressing charges??

She can't press charges. The statute of limitations has passed.

She might be able to pursue a civil suit for damages, but I'm not a lawyer, so don't know. Anyone know?

What exactly is the MD statue of limitations?

Again, how many years is it in Maryland?

There is no statue of limitations in Maryland. There are a bunch of statues in Baltimore City, some stone and some bronze, but those are mostly historical figures. None are of limitations.

Again, why hasn't she pressed charges?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's also a research PSYCHOLOGIST.

Perhaps because she was PSYCHOLOGICALLY TRAUMATIZED.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't she pressing charges??

She can't press charges. The statute of limitations has passed.

She might be able to pursue a civil suit for damages, but I'm not a lawyer, so don't know. Anyone know?

What exactly is the MD statue of limitations?

Again, how many years is it in Maryland?

There is no statue of limitations in Maryland. There are a bunch of statues in Baltimore City, some stone and some bronze, but those are mostly historical figures. None are of limitations.

Again, why hasn't she pressed charges?

your line of argument is a loser and weak, and you know it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Now that's a great point! And of course they planned it. I said first day of confirmation that if none of their BS works, me too is next.

In a way, I'm glad as the left is exposing its ugly underbelly to the American public.

Come on, Repubs knew all about this. Hoe else did the suddenly 65 women who knew him from high school suddenly get organized to attest to his good character? They had this in their back pocket in case the assault accusation came out.

All it takes is one angry friend/classmate to motivate the rest on social media. You can do it in an hour.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't she pressing charges??

She can't press charges. The statute of limitations has passed.

She might be able to pursue a civil suit for damages, but I'm not a lawyer, so don't know. Anyone know?

What exactly is the MD statue of limitations?

Again, how many years is it in Maryland?

There is no statue of limitations in Maryland. There are a bunch of statues in Baltimore City, some stone and some bronze, but those are mostly historical figures. None are of limitations.

Again, why hasn't she pressed charges?

What does a statue have to do with pressing charges? Statues are monuments to people, they have nothing to do with charges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I believe her. What does she have to gain, she only stands to lose from this no matter what.

Notariety, probably cash too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Such typically sleazy politics-of-destruction. Why didn't Feinstein share the letter during the public hearings or the private sessions afterwards, so the allegations could be discussed and considered? I'll tell you why: she's not interested in the truth or in fairness. She's trying last-minute hail-mary gotcha (though obviously planned for some time, with Feinstein "sitting there like a spider waiting to pounce.) Politics is war by other means.

Your faux outrage is exhausting. I thought Republicans loved real politik?

Where was your outrage as Russia leaked emails from Hillary's campaign staff "at the last minute"? Your complaints have zero credibility.

If the accusations are untrue, Kavanaugh has a well known remedy: suing his accuser for defamation/libel. This has been used successfully many times to restore someone's good name in the face of lies.

So Kavanaugh should sue, if she's lying.

You know who else also threatened to sue, but never did? Roy Moore.

And Donald Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't she pressing charges??

She can't press charges. The statute of limitations has passed.

She might be able to pursue a civil suit for damages, but I'm not a lawyer, so don't know. Anyone know?

What exactly is the MD statue of limitations?

Again, how many years is it in Maryland?

There is no statue of limitations in Maryland. There are a bunch of statues in Baltimore City, some stone and some bronze, but those are mostly historical figures. None are of limitations.

Again, why hasn't she pressed charges?

your line of argument is a loser and weak, and you know it.

Your reading skills are weaker. You’re arguing about stone monuments.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The GOP probably knew about this over the summer when the whole "sen feinstein hired a chinese spy" think broke.

BS. The Dems planned this. They sat on the letter until the 11th hour. Their timing is choreographed, just like their playacting the morning of the first hearing. This is "he said, she said" on steroids. For two months they said nothing to the GOP on the committee. It gave her time to get her social media cleaned up--although I did find one site where she gave a "clap" for an article about the Women's March.

Now that's a great point! And of course they planned it. I said first day of confirmation that if none of their BS works, me too is next.

In a way, I'm glad as the left is exposing its ugly underbelly to the American public.

Come on, Repubs knew all about this. Hoe else did the suddenly 65 women who knew him from high school suddenly get organized to attest to his good character? They had this in their back pocket in case the assault accusation came out.

All it takes is one angry friend/classmate to motivate the rest on social media. You can do it in an hour.

he went to an all boys school. and, no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't she pressing charges??

She can't press charges. The statute of limitations has passed.

She might be able to pursue a civil suit for damages, but I'm not a lawyer, so don't know. Anyone know?

What exactly is the MD statue of limitations?

Again, how many years is it in Maryland?

There is no statue of limitations in Maryland. There are a bunch of statues in Baltimore City, some stone and some bronze, but those are mostly historical figures. None are of limitations.

Again, why hasn't she pressed charges?

your line of argument is a loser and weak, and you know it.

FYI, we're asking a simple question, not "arguing" anything, my friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Recall that both Senator Collins and Senator Murkowski called on former Sen. Al Franken to resign amid accusations of sexual harassment.

Photos say it happened.

[Anonymous]

In the last two hours, 2 Republicans in the Senate Judiciary Committee have said they want to hear from Blasey Ford. And Kavanaugh’s friend Judge seems to be backing off a previous statement to just having no recollection.