Trump admin ADMITS wrongful deportation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then claims that they can't bring the person back.
WTH is this? They can't or won't fix their error? Is this the state of the US justice system? https://wtop.com/maryland/2025/04/trump-administration-concedes-maryland-father-from-el-salvador-was-mistakenly-deported-and-sent-to-mega-prison/

Why did you Democrats create this open border sh*t show?

It turns out, governing is hard. MAGA is experiencing this but blaming Biden for it rather than turning their brains on and realizing that this is a large country with big issues and lots of laws to deal with lots of situations.

Ignoring all of it and saying "Deport 100 people, don't bother me with details about who they are or whether they are removable!" leads to disasters. As we see now.

DP. Problem is, it is a disaster but really only affecting a few people who are the deportee and their family members.
A few of these mistakes, maybe even a few hundred of these mistakes, are but a grain of sand in the Sahara, in comparison to the number of people who have been stopped from coming in at the border and/or lawfully deported.
Unfortunate but I do think the majority are ok with this as the cost of getting things done.

This is not the cost of getting things done if you expect competence. Do you? The mistake we have seen in the last three months are ASTONISHING. The lack of accountability is SHOCKING. Why do you accept such incompetence from our elected officials????

Because I know how extremely complex things are, and our systems work most of the time, but nothing can be perfect.
We accept those kinds of risks all the time. We drive on roads knowing there’s a small chance of getting into a fatal accident. We get medical treatments knowing there’s a small chance of something going wrong. But we don’t stay at home and do nothing because those risks exist.

Activists would have us believe we shouldn’t do any immigration enforcement because mistakes can happen, but pragmatists recognize that can’t be a reason to stay home and do nothing.

See, this is exactly what I’m afraid of. People who hear snippets about deportation and crackdowns, but never the whole story. They’re grateful for enforcement of immigration laws and think, great, we’re making some progress! They hear about one, single administrative error and think, oh well, that’s just the cost of doing business, nothing’s perfect.

This administration is more about theater than justice or protection of American citizens. They’re putting on a show and they want to shock and awe people. Look how tough we are! Look at these results! They said they were going to round up the worst of the worst first. They said you have to get the bad guys first. 75% of these men not only had never been convicted of anything in the US, but they’d never even been arrested for anything. Our government can’t produce any evidence of wrongdoing for 3/4 of them, but we’ve labeled them terrorists and sent them to CECOT, which houses the *actual* worst of the worst from El Salvador.

You think Mr. Garcia’s case was an administrative error, but don’t care because he’s probably MS-13, and hey, nothing’s perfect, but make no mistake: this administration is not striving for perfection and falling short just short of it. They weren’t going after the worst criminals. They harvested low hanging fruit and called it a success. They’re putting on a show for you and they’re completely indifferent to the actual results. All they’re looking for is the public thinking they’re accomplishing something. It’s the exact same approach they’re taking to every governmental agency. They’re not cutting out waste; they’re funneling it in different directions. They’re not increasing efficiency; they’re dismantling the very framework that makes the bureaucracy run. But none of that matters because we see them shaking things up!

He may well be putting on a show, and I’m not convinced that this is the best and most efficient way of doing things, but the numbers at the border don’t lie. Like it or not, it’s working.

What were the numbers before these infamous plane trips?

This theater was not needed. It is only needed now to threaten all Americans with possible unreviewable exile. In "error".

This guy is not and never was American. He is a citizen of El Salvador. He is back in El Salvador.

Yes, this guy is not American. But I am. Who is going to object if the Trump administration picks me up and sends me to a prison in El Salvador? Not you, it seems.

Did you object to James Fields getting a 400 year sentence?

Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

What effect does this case have on your life?

None.

Any time court rulings are ignored without consequence by our own government, our justice system is eroded, our government becomes more powerful, and we lose what are supposed to be built-in protections. Today it’s Abrego Garcia. Someday it could be one of us on this board. You don’t care because it’s not you, but the time to speak up is now, before this is normalized and we’re all at risk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then claims that they can't bring the person back.
WTH is this? They can't or won't fix their error? Is this the state of the US justice system? https://wtop.com/maryland/2025/04/trump-administration-concedes-maryland-father-from-el-salvador-was-mistakenly-deported-and-sent-to-mega-prison/

Why did you Democrats create this open border sh*t show?

It turns out, governing is hard. MAGA is experiencing this but blaming Biden for it rather than turning their brains on and realizing that this is a large country with big issues and lots of laws to deal with lots of situations.

Ignoring all of it and saying "Deport 100 people, don't bother me with details about who they are or whether they are removable!" leads to disasters. As we see now.

DP. Problem is, it is a disaster but really only affecting a few people who are the deportee and their family members.
A few of these mistakes, maybe even a few hundred of these mistakes, are but a grain of sand in the Sahara, in comparison to the number of people who have been stopped from coming in at the border and/or lawfully deported.
Unfortunate but I do think the majority are ok with this as the cost of getting things done.

This is not the cost of getting things done if you expect competence. Do you? The mistake we have seen in the last three months are ASTONISHING. The lack of accountability is SHOCKING. Why do you accept such incompetence from our elected officials????

Because I know how extremely complex things are, and our systems work most of the time, but nothing can be perfect.
We accept those kinds of risks all the time. We drive on roads knowing there’s a small chance of getting into a fatal accident. We get medical treatments knowing there’s a small chance of something going wrong. But we don’t stay at home and do nothing because those risks exist.

Activists would have us believe we shouldn’t do any immigration enforcement because mistakes can happen, but pragmatists recognize that can’t be a reason to stay home and do nothing.

See, this is exactly what I’m afraid of. People who hear snippets about deportation and crackdowns, but never the whole story. They’re grateful for enforcement of immigration laws and think, great, we’re making some progress! They hear about one, single administrative error and think, oh well, that’s just the cost of doing business, nothing’s perfect.

This administration is more about theater than justice or protection of American citizens. They’re putting on a show and they want to shock and awe people. Look how tough we are! Look at these results! They said they were going to round up the worst of the worst first. They said you have to get the bad guys first. 75% of these men not only had never been convicted of anything in the US, but they’d never even been arrested for anything. Our government can’t produce any evidence of wrongdoing for 3/4 of them, but we’ve labeled them terrorists and sent them to CECOT, which houses the *actual* worst of the worst from El Salvador.

You think Mr. Garcia’s case was an administrative error, but don’t care because he’s probably MS-13, and hey, nothing’s perfect, but make no mistake: this administration is not striving for perfection and falling short just short of it. They weren’t going after the worst criminals. They harvested low hanging fruit and called it a success. They’re putting on a show for you and they’re completely indifferent to the actual results. All they’re looking for is the public thinking they’re accomplishing something. It’s the exact same approach they’re taking to every governmental agency. They’re not cutting out waste; they’re funneling it in different directions. They’re not increasing efficiency; they’re dismantling the very framework that makes the bureaucracy run. But none of that matters because we see them shaking things up!

He may well be putting on a show, and I’m not convinced that this is the best and most efficient way of doing things, but the numbers at the border don’t lie. Like it or not, it’s working.

What were the numbers before these infamous plane trips?

This theater was not needed. It is only needed now to threaten all Americans with possible unreviewable exile. In "error".

This guy is not and never was American. He is a citizen of El Salvador. He is back in El Salvador.

Yes, this guy is not American. But I am. Who is going to object if the Trump administration picks me up and sends me to a prison in El Salvador? Not you, it seems.

Did you object to James Fields getting a 400 year sentence?

I don’t understand the relevance of this question. Fields is a US citizen who had his day in court, pled guilty, and enjoys the protections of the US legal system for the duration of his prison sentence. What does he have to do with this case?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

Why would a judge get to decide where their own El Salvador citizen goes. He claimed some bogus persecution of his puousa store but gangs, sound fake. Now all the gangs are under control and the fake Biden asylum status has been revoked he can go home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway.

[Anonymous]

A judge needs to hold Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem in contempt and throw them both in jail if he’s not return by the morning. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

The question now before the Supreme Court is whether a court can order the President to engage in foreign diplomacy to return someone to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled on a similar issue in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 (2015) (Recognition Clause). Wrote Jefferson in 1790: “The transaction of business with foreign nations is executive altogether. It belongs, then, to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specially submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

The question now before the Supreme Court is whether a court can order the President to engage in foreign diplomacy to return someone to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled on a similar issue in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 (2015) (Recognition Clause). Wrote Jefferson in 1790: “The transaction of business with foreign nations is executive altogether. It belongs, then, to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specially submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”

They are just a contractor. The regime is paying them to house these people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then claims that they can't bring the person back.
WTH is this? They can't or won't fix their error? Is this the state of the US justice system? https://wtop.com/maryland/2025/04/trump-administration-concedes-maryland-father-from-el-salvador-was-mistakenly-deported-and-sent-to-mega-prison/

Why did you Democrats create this open border sh*t show?

It turns out, governing is hard. MAGA is experiencing this but blaming Biden for it rather than turning their brains on and realizing that this is a large country with big issues and lots of laws to deal with lots of situations.

Ignoring all of it and saying "Deport 100 people, don't bother me with details about who they are or whether they are removable!" leads to disasters. As we see now.

DP. Problem is, it is a disaster but really only affecting a few people who are the deportee and their family members.
A few of these mistakes, maybe even a few hundred of these mistakes, are but a grain of sand in the Sahara, in comparison to the number of people who have been stopped from coming in at the border and/or lawfully deported.
Unfortunate but I do think the majority are ok with this as the cost of getting things done.

This is not the cost of getting things done if you expect competence. Do you? The mistake we have seen in the last three months are ASTONISHING. The lack of accountability is SHOCKING. Why do you accept such incompetence from our elected officials????

Because I know how extremely complex things are, and our systems work most of the time, but nothing can be perfect.
We accept those kinds of risks all the time. We drive on roads knowing there’s a small chance of getting into a fatal accident. We get medical treatments knowing there’s a small chance of something going wrong. But we don’t stay at home and do nothing because those risks exist.

Activists would have us believe we shouldn’t do any immigration enforcement because mistakes can happen, but pragmatists recognize that can’t be a reason to stay home and do nothing.

See, this is exactly what I’m afraid of. People who hear snippets about deportation and crackdowns, but never the whole story. They’re grateful for enforcement of immigration laws and think, great, we’re making some progress! They hear about one, single administrative error and think, oh well, that’s just the cost of doing business, nothing’s perfect.

This administration is more about theater than justice or protection of American citizens. They’re putting on a show and they want to shock and awe people. Look how tough we are! Look at these results! They said they were going to round up the worst of the worst first. They said you have to get the bad guys first. 75% of these men not only had never been convicted of anything in the US, but they’d never even been arrested for anything. Our government can’t produce any evidence of wrongdoing for 3/4 of them, but we’ve labeled them terrorists and sent them to CECOT, which houses the *actual* worst of the worst from El Salvador.

You think Mr. Garcia’s case was an administrative error, but don’t care because he’s probably MS-13, and hey, nothing’s perfect, but make no mistake: this administration is not striving for perfection and falling short just short of it. They weren’t going after the worst criminals. They harvested low hanging fruit and called it a success. They’re putting on a show for you and they’re completely indifferent to the actual results. All they’re looking for is the public thinking they’re accomplishing something. It’s the exact same approach they’re taking to every governmental agency. They’re not cutting out waste; they’re funneling it in different directions. They’re not increasing efficiency; they’re dismantling the very framework that makes the bureaucracy run. But none of that matters because we see them shaking things up!

He may well be putting on a show, and I’m not convinced that this is the best and most efficient way of doing things, but the numbers at the border don’t lie. Like it or not, it’s working.

What were the numbers before these infamous plane trips?

This theater was not needed. It is only needed now to threaten all Americans with possible unreviewable exile. In "error".

This guy is not and never was American. He is a citizen of El Salvador. He is back in El Salvador.

Yes, this guy is not American. But I am. Who is going to object if the Trump administration picks me up and sends me to a prison in El Salvador? Not you, it seems.

Did you object to James Fields getting a 400 year sentence?

Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

What effect does this case have on your life?

None.

DP. When Jews were being deported from their homes, and sent to die in prisons, it didn’t affect my grandfather’s life much. And yet, he and the rest of the world, risked their lives to make it stop. Because it was the right thing to do. I have a hard time believing you’re an American at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

The question now before the Supreme Court is whether a court can order the President to engage in foreign diplomacy to return someone to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled on a similar issue in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 (2015) (Recognition Clause). Wrote Jefferson in 1790: “The transaction of business with foreign nations is executive altogether. It belongs, then, to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specially submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”

They are just a contractor. The regime is paying them to house these people.

El Salvador is a sovereign nation. He is a citizen of El Salvador.

Is the remedy here to violate Separation of Powers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

The question now before the Supreme Court is whether a court can order the President to engage in foreign diplomacy to return someone to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled on a similar issue in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 (2015) (Recognition Clause). Wrote Jefferson in 1790: “The transaction of business with foreign nations is executive altogether. It belongs, then, to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specially submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”

They are just a contractor. The regime is paying them to house these people.

El Salvador is a sovereign nation. He is a citizen of El Salvador.

Is the remedy here to violate Separation of Powers?

You’re presenting a false choice. The remedy is to hold those who break the law accountable. As far as I can see, those who ordered his deportation are responsible for whatever happened to him. Tantamount to kidnapping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

The question now before the Supreme Court is whether a court can order the President to engage in foreign diplomacy to return someone to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled on a similar issue in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 (2015) (Recognition Clause). Wrote Jefferson in 1790: “The transaction of business with foreign nations is executive altogether. It belongs, then, to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specially submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”

They are just a contractor. The regime is paying them to house these people.

El Salvador is a sovereign nation. He is a citizen of El Salvador.

Is the remedy here to violate Separation of Powers?

Ah yes because Trump is so respectful of other countries sovereignty.

[Anonymous]

The Trump administration has learned very quickly that they don't have to follow the rule of law because there are zero consequences for doing whatever they want. Republicans in Congress certainly are not holding them accountable and while most of the public hates, but they're doing, we really don't have a lot of power to stop him at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did he have due process?

Abrego Garcia did not. That's why some of us are concerned. Maybe you don't know what "due process" is. TBH, I didn't that in school. I learned it later. Maybe you haven't yet

Yes he had due process. The government made a mistake and did not follow the result of that due process.

He has been judged to be a danger to the community, denied bond, and found that the government could hold him in detention.
He was also found to be in danger if he was returned to El Salvador, so the government could not send him there.
What happened after that to allow him to not be held in detention is not clear.

However, the government can always deport him, and there is no additional due process required.
They just have to deport him somewhere other than El Salvador.

They did the one thing a court ruled they could not do and they’re not only taking no steps to correct the error, but are actively fighting in the courts to for the right to make no attempt to correct it. That’s the exact opposite of the rule of law.

The question now before the Supreme Court is whether a court can order the President to engage in foreign diplomacy to return someone to the U.S. The Supreme Court ruled on a similar issue in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 (2015) (Recognition Clause). Wrote Jefferson in 1790: “The transaction of business with foreign nations is executive altogether. It belongs, then, to the head of that department, except as to such portions of it as are specially submitted to the Senate. Exceptions are to be construed strictly.”

They are just a contractor. The regime is paying them to house these people.

El Salvador is a sovereign nation. He is a citizen of El Salvador.

Is the remedy here to violate Separation of Powers?

Ah yes because Trump is so respectful of other countries sovereignty.

That's not the issue.

Does the Supreme Court have the authority to order a President to engage in foreign relations? If those fail, can the Supreme Court order the U.S. military to invade another country to enforce its order?