Meghan and Prince Harry are moving to the U.S./Canada - OFFICIAL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do we know she still has protection? Without Harry, she’s back to a nobody and he’s not there. She does not deserve security. Such entitlement.

Of course she does!

Especially after the announcement, and after the way she was treated, the British Royal family would be facing a PR nightmare if anything happened to her. It would be worse than Diana. Before she left, they could hide behind “not knowing” what she was dealing with, but afterwards? There’s no excuse, they would be blamed and their brand would go down the toilet. It’s the type of damage that would take a generation to repair. Of course Meghan and Archie have protection. The queen is not an idiot.

Again, how do you know? You really don’t. Are you her friend....nevermind, she has none, her mom, the Queen, security yourself. Just don’t state assumptions as fact. If something happens to her, she has only herself to blame. She made herself famous by marrying a prince, didn’t like following the rules, that she was advised of BEFORE the wedding, and she took her ball and went home. Let her be plain Meghan Markle. Harry and Archie deserve security and I haven’t seen Archie with her in any pics.

She has a lot of friends.

She just picked her friend up from the airport herself yesterday. The PP is delusional.

Especially thinking Meghan has no security. It takes a declaration of the Home Office to strip her of 24/7 protection. Also Canada just positioned a Naval destroyer outside the bay where her island house is. *innocent whistle*

Yes, because she WANTS and CRAVES the public eye. If she didn't, she'd have had someone pick her friend up for her. The friend would have completely understood, given the big move for "privacy." But no, Meghan wanted to be seen.

So you keep saying. You are certifiable, PP. There's no arguing with crazy. They just dig in their heels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many ugly posters on this thread. You have the heart of an evil step-sister. You are not the princess and never will be but you can still salvage a decent life is you get a grip on your bitterness and jealousy. Seriously, you are nasty.

Are you implying Meghan is Cinderella? HAHAHAHAHAHA

That would be Kate.

No, it's Meghan. A lot of people, myself included, are rooting for her. I feel bad that so many mean spirited assholes feel no shame at all in posting some all of this ugliness. You are a nobody. She is married to a prince. Those are the facts.

I am not mean.
I am not mean spirited.
I am not an asshole....thank you very much.
I was rooting for her. I was over the moon happy for them. But I think what they have done is horrible and a slap in the face to Harry’s family. She has no family, except her mother, so now she will distance Harry from his. If this had been 5 years down the road, and she had really tried, I MAY feel differently. But what they have done is wrong and I feel she planned everything out. She cut out anyone who cautioned Harry, out of obvious concern, about moving too quickly with her....including Will. She is divorced and had a boyfriend when she started dating Harry. Please, don’t try and paint her as some innocent, hurt party. I thought they were a beautiful couple, watched and loved the wedding, was so excited when she became pregnant, but during her pregnancy you could feel her pulling away. They couldn’t live next to Will and Kate. They spent millions renovating a cottage they are now too good for. Those are the facts. You would be a lot more credible if you used your words and not resort to name calling.

Harry had a girlfriend when he met Meghan. Why do you not mention that? So what she was divorced, are divorced women to remain unmarried? Do you paint all divorced women with such a scarlet letter? Moving too quickly. How long should a 30plus couple date before moving on or marrying? Is it two years, five years, ten years. How many? H&M were over thirty when they met and married two-years after dating. How is that moving too fast. I think so many women are used to being sidelined until a guy picks them that they are okay waiting and waiting to get picked. Therefore, such women think other women who refuse to wait are moving too fast. As Bernie says, women will always be last because women tear into other women more than any man ever could.

Bernie doesn't understand culture or the role that men and women play in enforcing it.

Wait, do you mean Bernie Sanders? He said that?

Gosh, no wonder the Bernie Bros are so toxic.

Toxic or not. It's true. Look at the women in this thread thrashing at Meghan. She's been called a succubus, a witch, a homewrecker, etc. Women are vipers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many ugly posters on this thread. You have the heart of an evil step-sister. You are not the princess and never will be but you can still salvage a decent life is you get a grip on your bitterness and jealousy. Seriously, you are nasty.

Are you implying Meghan is Cinderella? HAHAHAHAHAHA

That would be Kate.

No, it's Meghan. A lot of people, myself included, are rooting for her. I feel bad that so many mean spirited assholes feel no shame at all in posting some all of this ugliness. You are a nobody. She is married to a prince. Those are the facts.

I am not mean.
I am not mean spirited.
I am not an asshole....thank you very much.
I was rooting for her. I was over the moon happy for them. But I think what they have done is horrible and a slap in the face to Harry’s family. She has no family, except her mother, so now she will distance Harry from his. If this had been 5 years down the road, and she had really tried, I MAY feel differently. But what they have done is wrong and I feel she planned everything out. She cut out anyone who cautioned Harry, out of obvious concern, about moving too quickly with her....including Will. She is divorced and had a boyfriend when she started dating Harry. Please, don’t try and paint her as some innocent, hurt party. I thought they were a beautiful couple, watched and loved the wedding, was so excited when she became pregnant, but during her pregnancy you could feel her pulling away. They couldn’t live next to Will and Kate. They spent millions renovating a cottage they are now too good for. Those are the facts. You would be a lot more credible if you used your words and not resort to name calling.

Harry had a girlfriend when he met Meghan. Why do you not mention that? So what she was divorced, are divorced women to remain unmarried? Do you paint all divorced women with such a scarlet letter? Moving too quickly. How long should a 30plus couple date before moving on or marrying? Is it two years, five years, ten years. How many? H&M were over thirty when they met and married two-years after dating. How is that moving too fast. I think so many women are used to being sidelined until a guy picks them that they are okay waiting and waiting to get picked. Therefore, such women think other women who refuse to wait are moving too fast. As Bernie says, women will always be last because women tear into other women more than any man ever could.

Women's aggression may not take the same form as men's, but girls and women are indeed aggressive, often indirectly and mainly toward one another. They judge harshly, hold grudges, gossip, exclude, and disconnect from other women.

It's a good read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does anyone feel that this was done slightly childish and for attention? Like many of the dcum posts we have about writing a letter to mom about your grievances, or your mom writing you a letter passively aggressively apologizing for not being the mom you need? And we all say that it is best to avoid some kind of confrontation and act adult as you are? It seems to me that public announcement by Harry and Meghan was nothing but one of those, totally unnecessary and attention grabbing letters. All of this was clearly possible and easy to do if they just acted like adults and mature people. They could have moved to Canada without this drama of letting the "world" know their grievances, some real, some perceived. It reminds me of so many posts about, Mom loves him better, mom and dad gave her the land, mom and dad prefer my siblings kids. And we always give advice to shut up and act like an adult. This was all not that big of a deal, sounds like Queen would have approved their move anyway.

Agree with all of this but especially the bold.

Either the Queen's courier or Kate's courier leaked it to the press. Harry had been working with his grandmother and father to make a smoother transition, but hey when some members of your family aim to make you look bad, you do what you must to protect your immediate family. All of you who say you would have handled it differently are liars.

Yeah, but Harry hadn't come up with any workable plan. He still hasn't, really.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many ugly posters on this thread. You have the heart of an evil step-sister. You are not the princess and never will be but you can still salvage a decent life is you get a grip on your bitterness and jealousy. Seriously, you are nasty.

Are you implying Meghan is Cinderella? HAHAHAHAHAHA

That would be Kate.

No, it's Meghan. A lot of people, myself included, are rooting for her. I feel bad that so many mean spirited assholes feel no shame at all in posting some all of this ugliness. You are a nobody. She is married to a prince. Those are the facts.

I am not mean.
I am not mean spirited.
I am not an asshole....thank you very much.
I was rooting for her. I was over the moon happy for them. But I think what they have done is horrible and a slap in the face to Harry’s family. She has no family, except her mother, so now she will distance Harry from his. If this had been 5 years down the road, and she had really tried, I MAY feel differently. But what they have done is wrong and I feel she planned everything out. She cut out anyone who cautioned Harry, out of obvious concern, about moving too quickly with her....including Will. She is divorced and had a boyfriend when she started dating Harry. Please, don’t try and paint her as some innocent, hurt party. I thought they were a beautiful couple, watched and loved the wedding, was so excited when she became pregnant, but during her pregnancy you could feel her pulling away. They couldn’t live next to Will and Kate. They spent millions renovating a cottage they are now too good for. Those are the facts. You would be a lot more credible if you used your words and not resort to name calling.

Harry had a girlfriend when he met Meghan. Why do you not mention that? So what she was divorced, are divorced women to remain unmarried? Do you paint all divorced women with such a scarlet letter? Moving too quickly. How long should a 30plus couple date before moving on or marrying? Is it two years, five years, ten years. How many? H&M were over thirty when they met and married two-years after dating. How is that moving too fast. I think so many women are used to being sidelined until a guy picks them that they are okay waiting and waiting to get picked. Therefore, such women think other women who refuse to wait are moving too fast. As Bernie says, women will always be last because women tear into other women more than any man ever could.

Bernie doesn't understand culture or the role that men and women play in enforcing it.

Wait, do you mean Bernie Sanders? He said that?

Gosh, no wonder the Bernie Bros are so toxic.

Toxic or not. It's true. Look at the women in this thread thrashing at Meghan. She's been called a succubus, a witch, a homewrecker, etc. Women are vipers.

Women enforce culture. Not men. Anyone with sense already knows this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So many ugly posters on this thread. You have the heart of an evil step-sister. You are not the princess and never will be but you can still salvage a decent life is you get a grip on your bitterness and jealousy. Seriously, you are nasty.

Are you implying Meghan is Cinderella? HAHAHAHAHAHA

That would be Kate.

No, it's Meghan. A lot of people, myself included, are rooting for her. I feel bad that so many mean spirited assholes feel no shame at all in posting some all of this ugliness. You are a nobody. She is married to a prince. Those are the facts.

I am not mean.
I am not mean spirited.
I am not an asshole....thank you very much.
I was rooting for her. I was over the moon happy for them. But I think what they have done is horrible and a slap in the face to Harry’s family. She has no family, except her mother, so now she will distance Harry from his. If this had been 5 years down the road, and she had really tried, I MAY feel differently. But what they have done is wrong and I feel she planned everything out. She cut out anyone who cautioned Harry, out of obvious concern, about moving too quickly with her....including Will. She is divorced and had a boyfriend when she started dating Harry. Please, don’t try and paint her as some innocent, hurt party. I thought they were a beautiful couple, watched and loved the wedding, was so excited when she became pregnant, but during her pregnancy you could feel her pulling away. They couldn’t live next to Will and Kate. They spent millions renovating a cottage they are now too good for. Those are the facts. You would be a lot more credible if you used your words and not resort to name calling.

Harry had a girlfriend when he met Meghan. Why do you not mention that? So what she was divorced, are divorced women to remain unmarried? Do you paint all divorced women with such a scarlet letter? Moving too quickly. How long should a 30plus couple date before moving on or marrying? Is it two years, five years, ten years. How many? H&M were over thirty when they met and married two-years after dating. How is that moving too fast. I think so many women are used to being sidelined until a guy picks them that they are okay waiting and waiting to get picked. Therefore, such women think other women who refuse to wait are moving too fast. As Bernie says, women will always be last because women tear into other women more than any man ever could.

Bernie doesn't understand culture or the role that men and women play in enforcing it.

Wait, do you mean Bernie Sanders? He said that?

Gosh, no wonder the Bernie Bros are so toxic.

Toxic or not. It's true. Look at the women in this thread thrashing at Meghan. She's been called a succubus, a witch, a homewrecker, etc. Women are vipers.

It's not true, you (and Bernie) are just ignoring the male equivalent of this. I'm not denying the MM haters here are obscenely toxic -- of course they are -- but they aren't any nastier than a group of sports bros. Do you have any idea what goes on at Barstool Sports if a popular player is accused of domestic violence, for instance? It makes DCUM look like a few party.

God, Bernie is such a misogynist jerk. I am wildly anti-Trump, but there are days when I think women would be better with him than Bernie.

[Anonymous]

Oh, it's pretty clear Meghan Markle wants attention. She was an actress, for god's sake! All actors have huge egos. I don't find that a problem per se. I don't care about her running away to Canada, that's fine with me. But the excuses given to defend her are somewhat petulant. She didn't receive any press that was nastier or more unflattering than any other royal has many times over. But she couldn't cope with it. She also didn't want to spend her life doing actual dull charitable things like sponsoring charities and sitting on the boards and doing all the tedious stuff. She just wants to flitter into a room of adoring poor people, have a bunch of photos taken, and then flitter back into her private chauffeured car and have no one criticize the shallowness of it. She wants to control how the press reports her (which is a big clue as to her entitled ego). But I think she's in for a rude surprise. Canada is not a place, methinks, where people warm to the concept of someone playing the grand lady and they have to kiss the ground she walked and not make fun of it.

[Anonymous]

Eh. I said this up-thread but my elderly Canadian mother is thrilled about the idea of them in Canada.

[Anonymous]

Am I enjoying the British press leaving the island in masse to follow Meghan to Canada and freezing their bums off while doing so?

You better believe it!



https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1218162412366503938

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it's pretty clear Meghan Markle wants attention. She was an actress, for god's sake! All actors have huge egos. I don't find that a problem per se. I don't care about her running away to Canada, that's fine with me. But the excuses given to defend her are somewhat petulant. She didn't receive any press that was nastier or more unflattering than any other royal has many times over. But she couldn't cope with it. She also didn't want to spend her life doing actual dull charitable things like sponsoring charities and sitting on the boards and doing all the tedious stuff. She just wants to flitter into a room of adoring poor people, have a bunch of photos taken, and then flitter back into her private chauffeured car and have no one criticize the shallowness of it. She wants to control how the press reports her (which is a big clue as to her entitled ego). But I think she's in for a rude surprise. Canada is not a place, methinks, where people warm to the concept of someone playing the grand lady and they have to kiss the ground she walked and not make fun of it.

It's Harry who can't cope with it. He saw what it did to his own mother. That you have a blank spot in your brain about this, when he's said it over and over and over and over, is frankly scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I enjoying the British press leaving the island in masse to follow Meghan to Canada and freezing their bums off while doing so?

You better believe it!



https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1218162412366503938

Hahah, that's awesome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it's pretty clear Meghan Markle wants attention. She was an actress, for god's sake! All actors have huge egos. I don't find that a problem per se. I don't care about her running away to Canada, that's fine with me. But the excuses given to defend her are somewhat petulant. She didn't receive any press that was nastier or more unflattering than any other royal has many times over. But she couldn't cope with it. She also didn't want to spend her life doing actual dull charitable things like sponsoring charities and sitting on the boards and doing all the tedious stuff. She just wants to flitter into a room of adoring poor people, have a bunch of photos taken, and then flitter back into her private chauffeured car and have no one criticize the shallowness of it. She wants to control how the press reports her (which is a big clue as to her entitled ego). But I think she's in for a rude surprise. Canada is not a place, methinks, where people warm to the concept of someone playing the grand lady and they have to kiss the ground she walked and not make fun of it.

It's Harry who can't cope with it. He saw what it did to his own mother. That you have a blank spot in your brain about this, when he's said it over and over and over and over, is frankly scary.

Oh please, no one cares about Harry. This thread is 274 pages long and it's ALL ABOUT THAT AUDACITY OF THAT PRETENTIOUS COLORED GIRL!!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh, it's pretty clear Meghan Markle wants attention. She was an actress, for god's sake! All actors have huge egos. I don't find that a problem per se. I don't care about her running away to Canada, that's fine with me. But the excuses given to defend her are somewhat petulant. She didn't receive any press that was nastier or more unflattering than any other royal has many times over. But she couldn't cope with it. She also didn't want to spend her life doing actual dull charitable things like sponsoring charities and sitting on the boards and doing all the tedious stuff. She just wants to flitter into a room of adoring poor people, have a bunch of photos taken, and then flitter back into her private chauffeured car and have no one criticize the shallowness of it. She wants to control how the press reports her (which is a big clue as to her entitled ego). But I think she's in for a rude surprise. Canada is not a place, methinks, where people warm to the concept of someone playing the grand lady and they have to kiss the ground she walked and not make fun of it.

It's Harry who can't cope with it. He saw what it did to his own mother. That you have a blank spot in your brain about this, when he's said it over and over and over and over, is frankly scary.

Harry wouldn't be moving to Canada if it wasn't for Meghan....

It's not Harry who popped right back on the plane the day after the announcement and refused to see the rest of the royals. Just a FYI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I enjoying the British press leaving the island in masse to follow Meghan to Canada and freezing their bums off while doing so?

You better believe it!



https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1218162412366503938

I think they are enjoying this too! She loves to be their cash cow, and now they get to milk her harder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Am I enjoying the British press leaving the island in masse to follow Meghan to Canada and freezing their bums off while doing so?

You better believe it!



https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1218162412366503938

That's not the British press. That's Kier Simmons. He may be British but he works for an American news program, the Today Show. In other words, he reports for American TV. Not British TV.

But I guess that didn't fit your narrative, did it?