Fire in upper NW?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:In these arrest photos, it is super-hard to see shoulder-length dredlocks on Wint.

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Daron-Wint-Mansion-Murder-DC-Charging-Documents-304744581.html

Court documents also indicate more than one person knew of the delivery of the $40,000 to the Savopoulos family's home in the hours before the victims died.
In fact, one of those witnesses changed his story about critical details of the case while police were interviewing him, changing his claims of when the request to deliver money was made, how he received the package and where it was left.


Pulled this piece from the text of this clip, so it appears the assistant maybe involved?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In these arrest photos, it is super-hard to see shoulder-length dredlocks on Wint.

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Daron-Wint-Mansion-Murder-DC-Charging-Documents-304744581.html

Court documents also indicate more than one person knew of the delivery of the $40,000 to the Savopoulos family's home in the hours before the victims died.
In fact, one of those witnesses changed his story about critical details of the case while police were interviewing him, changing his claims of when the request to deliver money was made, how he received the package and where it was left.


Pulled this piece from the text of this clip, so it appears the assistant maybe involved?

What ties ALL of these people together is a love of fancy cars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would an accomplice take public transportation if there was a porsche? Seems very unlikely to me. If there was an accomplice, s/he almost certainly had a ride or a car 2 blocks away.

Now, why would Wint take the porsche if an accomplice had some alternative (non-public transportation) way of leaving? porsche was simply a liability.

I think he did this because he is brazen and a psychopath and didn't care if he got caught or drew attention to himself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would an accomplice take public transportation if there was a porsche? Seems very unlikely to me. If there was an accomplice, s/he almost certainly had a ride or a car 2 blocks away.

Now, why would Wint take the porsche if an accomplice had some alternative (non-public transportation) way of leaving? porsche was simply a liability.

I think he did this because he is brazen and a psychopath and didn't care if he got caught or drew attention to himself

OH yeah and I also meant to add because he's an idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure the assistant is female

There are 2 assts. The one who delivered the money is male and used to work at the Indoor Driving place. He was hired by SS who went to the Indoor Driving place. This asst. was "let go" by the indoor driving place in March, and SS hired him to be his personal asst/personal driver.

I keep trying to find the interview on this thread with the asst. from pages ago. It had photos of Phillip in the go kart....I cannot find the link! Can anyone help me? It was around the time that Vera's husband's interview was also printed, I think.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure the assistant is female

There are 2 assts. The one who delivered the money is male and used to work at the Indoor Driving place. He was hired by SS who went to the Indoor Driving place. This asst. was "let go" by the indoor driving place in March, and SS hired him to be his personal asst/personal driver.

I keep trying to find the interview on this thread with the asst. from pages ago. It had photos of Phillip in the go kart....I cannot find the link! Can anyone help me? It was around the time that Vera's husband's interview was also printed, I think.

This wasn't an interview with the assistant but it does have pictures of the interior of the S's cars and of PS in the go kart. http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/29129466/savopoulos-assistant

[Anonymous]

Omg stop with the assistant finger pointing! This has been gone over, his changing story is minor and does not implicate him of murder.
He texted a pic of the money to a friend because it's a cool novelty to handle $40k in cash. He did not know it was a hostage-murder situation! Just that his boss needed the money. Accusing the assistant of skimming off the top is also ridiculous. He'd be fired immediately. Nobody would do that. Geez.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg stop with the assistant finger pointing! This has been gone over, his changing story is minor and does not implicate him of murder.
He texted a pic of the money to a friend because it's a cool novelty to handle $40k in cash. He did not know it was a hostage-murder situation! Just that his boss needed the money. Accusing the assistant of skimming off the top is also ridiculous. He'd be fired immediately. Nobody would do that. Geez.

I agree I don't think the assistant was involved. However, I think if I was his employer and knew about him posting pics of my cars and my cash, I would be livid.

[Anonymous]

It is ironic that Amy Savapolous' only public posts on Facebook are several non-recent articles about cuncussions.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Are there any pictures of the assistant? I just need to know if it is a "she" and AA with her hair cut short "like you';d normally see on AA males. That would explain a lot. I don't know many AA male that would fit the MO of the people were describing wearing pink pants, especially like the ones PP posted. The Porsche pic looks like velour track pants to me.

Unless I am completely wrong about the identity of the assistant, it is a "he" who is dark complected with short black hair and a bit of black facial hair. Based on the photos I have seen, he might variously be identified as Hispanic, Middle Eastern, Black, or white. His Instagram profile picture and his Twitter profile picture could almost be different people because of different haircuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg stop with the assistant finger pointing! This has been gone over, his changing story is minor and does not implicate him of murder.
He texted a pic of the money to a friend because it's a cool novelty to handle $40k in cash. He did not know it was a hostage-murder situation! Just that his boss needed the money. Accusing the assistant of skimming off the top is also ridiculous. He'd be fired immediately. Nobody would do that. Geez.

I agree I don't think the assistant was involved. However, I think if I was his employer and knew about him posting pics of my cars and my cash, I would be livid.

The cars- eh. He was a driver in a new exciting job driving cool luxury cars. I think that's ok. The money picture, from what it seems, was just a private picture via text to a personal friend. I think that's ok too. Certainly not weird, criminally minded, or fire able, imo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope they are keeping a close eye on the brother. And I will sleep a little easier when they catch the accomplices.

Yep, I live in the neighborhood, and the rest of my family is out of town. I get rattled every night when the sun goes down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are there any pictures of the assistant? I just need to know if it is a "she" and AA with her hair cut short "like you';d normally see on AA males. That would explain a lot. I don't know many AA male that would fit the MO of the people were describing wearing pink pants, especially like the ones PP posted. The Porsche pic looks like velour track pants to me.

Same PP.... No reason to think it was the assistant, butI'm thinking at least the accomplice is AA female with short hair

[Anonymous]

Pink pants are preppy. You think a Racecar driver met the smart, wealthy CEO of a successful company, talked his way into a highly trusted job- that as of a driver and personal assistant? You think The type to wear preppy pink pants, the one who was trusted with hundreds of thousands of dollars of cars, the CEO's life constantly in the passenger seat- would participate in this brutal torture and murder? For a cut of $40k?
No. Stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Omg stop with the assistant finger pointing! This has been gone over, his changing story is minor and does not implicate him of murder.
He texted a pic of the money to a friend because it's a cool novelty to handle $40k in cash. He did not know it was a hostage-murder situation! Just that his boss needed the money. Accusing the assistant of skimming off the top is also ridiculous. He'd be fired immediately. Nobody would do that. Geez.

I agree I don't think the assistant was involved. However, I think if I was his employer and knew about him posting pics of my cars and my cash, I would be livid.

The cars- eh. He was a driver in a new exciting job driving cool luxury cars. I think that's ok. The money picture, from what it seems, was just a private picture via text to a personal friend. I think that's ok too. Certainly not weird, criminally minded, or fire able, imo

Well, I disagree. It may not be weird or criminally minded but it is still not the type of thing I'd want my employee sharing about me. The private picture with a friend, might not be such a big deal if it didn't involve huge sums of cash, which I think is a risky thing to share a picture of, with anyone. But the publicly posted pictures of the cars would seriously bother me as his employer. It seems inappropriate...like if my housekeeper were to share pictures of my house, it just feels too personal to me and, again, even if not criminal, it would be unsettling and it IS something I would consider firing someone over.