Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the AH fans who claimed Johnny will never be in a blockbuster again or whatever -- Wall Street Journal reports his Dior cologne is selling out. His star power is through the roof; a blockbuster comeback is imminent.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1532520000245882880

Imagine if he has a sort of catharsis and changes his appearance to old Johnny. The shorter hair, no mustache, no rings and funky chains, etc. More of a polished look.

Yes!! (DP)

Johnny with muscular bod, health nut type, hiking, snowboarding, juicing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Gal Gadot stopped following AH on Insta.

And yuck.
What a spineless twOt. No sisterhood. There isn’t a sisterhood. If you are abused by your partner you albetter be prepared for a lonely road. Feel deeply for Amber.

Forget about sisterhood - does Amber have any friends?
The unfollowing happened on the day when Amber was trying to convince everyone how she's on the same career level as Gal Gadot or Zendaya.

I don't blame Gal Gadot at all. The arrogance of comparing Amber to other actors was uncomfortable to watch! The Hollywood expert, Richard Marks was great at putting it in proper perspective!! He made it clear Amber was not in the same category.

Omg, that man was so awesome!

He was fascinating to listen to with all his experience, the first time and on rebuttal! He didn't hesitate, so didn't get interrupted by the lawyers. I have to go back and watch his time on the stand and a few others. So much great information!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

He’s seemed to of right sided it now. I’m sure offers are coming in for him while Heard is now an untouchable pariah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

He’s seemed to of right sided it now. I’m sure offers are coming in for him while Heard is now an untouchable pariah.

If she plays it right, she can get villain roles after all her performances. She would make an awesome cruella, wicked step mother, witch, hired assassin, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

He’s seemed to of right sided it now. I’m sure offers are coming in for him while Heard is now an untouchable pariah.

If she plays it right, she can get villain roles after all her performances. She would make an awesome cruella, wicked step mother, witch, hired assassin, etc.

oh that's true. A villain people would love to despise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

He’s seemed to of right sided it now. I’m sure offers are coming in for him while Heard is now an untouchable pariah.

If she plays it right, she can get villain roles after all her performances. She would make an awesome cruella, wicked step mother, witch, hired assassin, etc.

In all seriousness she’ll either have to do video on demand roles or maybe turn to YouTube or onlyfans to support herself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

He’s seemed to of right sided it now. I’m sure offers are coming in for him while Heard is now an untouchable pariah.

If she plays it right, she can get villain roles after all her performances. She would make an awesome cruella, wicked step mother, witch, hired assassin, etc.

In all seriousness she’ll either have to do video on demand roles or maybe turn to YouTube or onlyfans to support herself.

She’ll end up on the reality and talk show circuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was a toxic waste dump of a relationship and they clearly abused each other.

The lesson here is to not take out op-eds in newspapers talking about how you were abused when you gave as good as you got.

I agree. Painting herself as the helpless victim and him as the sole perpetrator of abuse was a bad idea.

I agree too. This is the most accurate assessment I've seen of this trial.

I also agree with those saying how horrible this is for abuse victims. However, I disagree that the fault is with J.D. It's with both of them. She should have never written what she did, given her role in the relationship (it's not just that she was "not a perfect victim" - she was also very much an abuser in the relationship).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was a toxic waste dump of a relationship and they clearly abused each other.

The lesson here is to not take out op-eds in newspapers talking about how you were abused when you gave as good as you got.

I agree. Painting herself as the helpless victim and him as the sole perpetrator of abuse was a bad idea.

I agree too. This is the most accurate assessment I've seen of this trial.

I also agree with those saying how horrible this is for abuse victims. However, I disagree that the fault is with J.D. It's with both of them. She should have never written what she did, given her role in the relationship (it's not just that she was "not a perfect victim" - she was also very much an abuser in the relationship).

She would have done a mass PR smear campaign too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ACLU gets a black eye here, too. If your lawyers are ghost writing an op-Ed that results in a multi-million dollar judgment, that is less than ideal legal work.

I hope JD goes after them next. The ACLU has lost its way.

ACLU is suing him for 86k claiming it’s what it cost them to prepare paperwork evidence for the trial. Hope they never get it.

86 K is a high cost for this. For a cost that high, I assume they fought the production extensively with pricey outside counsel. We're not talking about copying costs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really amazed that people assume Johnny was the first one who laid a hand and therefore Amber must have lived the relationship in self-defense instead of the other way around—especially when she has the proven history of DV and was recorded many times admitting to instigating fights. Mind boggling, really.

Only women can be believed.

Yup. Too many still think men can't be victims. Such as the PP with the "abuse" post. Jerk.

Men can be abuse victims, but JD isn’t. He’s a washed-up junkie desperate to blame anyone but himself for ruining his life.

He’s seemed to of right sided it now. I’m sure offers are coming in for him while Heard is now an untouchable pariah.

If she plays it right, she can get villain roles after all her performances. She would make an awesome cruella, wicked step mother, witch, hired assassin, etc.

In all seriousness she’ll either have to do video on demand roles or maybe turn to YouTube or onlyfans to support herself.

She’ll end up on the reality and talk show circuit.

I really don't believe this and I'm not a AH fan. She seems like a really stubborn person and a fighter. She'll probably end up with some rich lesbian and to keep her dignity, she'll do some sort of work for women's rights. We can expect a book and more plastic surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ACLU gets a black eye here, too. If your lawyers are ghost writing an op-Ed that results in a multi-million dollar judgment, that is less than ideal legal work.

I hope JD goes after them next. The ACLU has lost its way.

ACLU is suing him for 86k claiming it’s what it cost them to prepare paperwork evidence for the trial. Hope they never get it.

86 K is a high cost for this. For a cost that high, I assume they fought the production extensively with pricey outside counsel. We're not talking about copying costs.

I believe it includes depositions in response to the subpoena.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the AH fans who claimed Johnny will never be in a blockbuster again or whatever -- Wall Street Journal reports his Dior cologne is selling out. His star power is through the roof; a blockbuster comeback is imminent.

https://twitter.com/WSJ/status/1532520000245882880

Imagine if he has a sort of catharsis and changes his appearance to old Johnny. The shorter hair, no mustache, no rings and funky chains, etc. More of a polished look.

Yes!! (DP)

Johnny with muscular bod, health nut type, hiking, snowboarding, juicing

Won’t happen, and even if it did, he would still think you’re a pathetic remora.

[Anonymous]

I'm going to Sephora to check out Savage, I vaguely remember it being pretty delicious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ACLU gets a black eye here, too. If your lawyers are ghost writing an op-Ed that results in a multi-million dollar judgment, that is less than ideal legal work.

I hope JD goes after them next. The ACLU has lost its way.

ACLU is suing him for 86k claiming it’s what it cost them to prepare paperwork evidence for the trial. Hope they never get it.

86 K is a high cost for this. For a cost that high, I assume they fought the production extensively with pricey outside counsel. We're not talking about copying costs.

Also they involved themselves by writing her op ed. Nobody will owe them damages.