Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

Don’t feed the crazy RWNJ troll.

All of you are jumping on this poster not realizing they are argeeing with you- they're talking about what the new rw talking point IS, not agreeing with it.

Sure troll. The talking point on the right is that this is our Reichstag fire and we must seize the moment.

This is literallt what they're saying, idiot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People bringing video games but refusing to discuss what game was referenced on the shell casings are being dishonest. He referred to a game called Hell Divers 2 which is a satire of fascism. It is essentially a video game version of the StarShip Troopers movie. He was a leftist.

All the inscriptions are gamer references. But you are arguing all gamers are leftists? Are you serious?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People bringing video games but refusing to discuss what game was referenced on the shell casings are being dishonest. He referred to a game called Hell Divers 2 which is a satire of fascism. It is essentially a video game version of the StarShip Troopers movie. He was a leftist.

If maga is leftist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Sad they did not control/ monitor his computer use more.

But I guess at 22, patents can only do so much.

(In a country where the default rule is,”you can have a gun, until and unless you use it to kill someone. “)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

It’s not new, you’re just too old to know what young people are up to.

Super, then define it. Here. Now.

What's with the tone? Do you think everyone responding to you is collectively making up a fake word?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groypers

+1 she sounds really unhinged. There are many things she doesn’t know about because of her sheltered life and she isn’t willing to admit it.

[Anonymous]

Come on down MaGa two in one day your white Christian makes shot people!

Radicalized’ Evergreen High School shooter appeared to hold antisemitic, violent views in online accounts.

Yeah it never was anyone but MAGA doing violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing is very clear: the reaction of a huge swath of the left, who celebrated and cheered Kirk's assassination.

Kirk was the "nice guy" that allegedly the left wanted to debate. And yet he was killed... and the left celebrated, cheered, and put out t-shirts. This site is full of "Kirk said stuff so it's good he was killed!" type posts.

And people have noticed the reaction of the left. And noticed just how gleeful and celebratory the left was when someone who holds beliefs the vast majority of Americans hold, such as "DEI is bad" and "men in dresses do not belong in women's sports" was killed.

It's patently obvious it is not just Kirk that the left wants dead. The reaction by leftists has made it crystal clear.

His debates were staged and cherrypicked and he refused to debate anyone with a brain. Bad faith actor.

That said I no longer give a crap what you think and want to say about the left, because it's all completely irrelevant now that we know the guy who shot him wasn't even a leftist, he's an alt-right groyper, as seen in the memes that the shooter embraced. That's right, the shooter was not a "deranged leftist" - he was to the right of Charlie Kirk. The groypers view Kirk as a sellout, and as a fake conservative.

That seems to be the new talking point - shooter’s motive doesn’t matter, what really matters is the celebrating lefties who hate America and must be stopped

You're full of crap. Every major Democrat has strongly denounced and condemned the shooting.

And the shooter's motive is that he's an alt-right Groyper who believed Charlie Kirk was a conservative-lite sellout.

What’s this supposedly new “groyper” word and who originally came up w it?

Where is ANY news source reporting anything about groypers, Fuentes? It’s a dcum made up narrative.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212
https://www.newsweek.com/groyper-charlie-kirk-shooting-nick-fuentes-2129114

Social media users continue to pick apart unverified information gleaned from the social media accounts of the alleged shooter’s family. But it’s still too early to definitively say what Robinson believed.

“Bella Ciao” is an old anti-fascist song dedicated to anti-Nazi resistance fighters in Italy during World War II.

Groypers, the term for far-right and white nationalist social media users who are terminally online and follow white supremacist Nick Fuentes, seemed uneasy in their discussions on 4Chan Friday, with some seeing overlap in the etched messages and typical Groyper humor.

https://gizmodo.com/charlie-kirks-alleged-killer-wrote-meme-messages-on-bullet-casings-2000658212

As of Friday afternoon, it remained unclear what the motive was in the Kirk shooting, or what the suspect's political views were.


Cox said that a family member of Robinson had told investigators that at a recent family dinner, Robinson had mentioned Kirk’s upcoming Utah Valley event, and “they talked about why they didn’t like him and the viewpoints that he had,” Cox said. “The family member also stated Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate.”

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/12/us/tyler-robinson-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-invs

So groypers think Kirk was full of hate?

Or we can all wait until the authorities finish interviewing the shooter and hear w we hat he has to say about it.

Oh, like the information they got interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell? Right, I'm sure MAGA law enforcement will present something that contradicts Trump's declaration that the suspect is a trans antifa leftist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This from the Guardian:

Who paid or found this "friend"

Why don’t you ask the totally anonymous posters here who are claiming the shooter is a groyper and killed Kirk because he wasn’t extremely right for their contact information and ask for their sources?

[Anonymous]

You guys. If this guy was a leftist Trump would be live on TV right now calling for martial law. The fact that he's silent, as are all of his goons, tells you everything you need to know. It's over.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This from the Guardian:

Who paid or found this "friend"

Or made them up.

Dcum is making up stuff, not providing links or sources. When a link is provided, it says there isn’t enough information available yet.

Why do you think the Guardian is making up lies? You think the Guardian is concocting a conspiracy?

The Guardian does not currently have that article posted. Show me a link to where they currently have that information up, please, and then I can read it in context.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What he wrote on the shell casings and his comments about Charlie “spreading hate” confirm the shooters political beliefs. What do you have to gain by pretending that he wasn’t a leftist ?

I don’t think liberal would find issues with him being liberal because the idea that liberals would kill someone who is MAGA is not part of mainstream liberal thinking. Most liberals have MAGA family, which they view with concern and annoyance but murdering someone over politics is not ok. Only extreme fringe folks celebrated his death. Most liberals I know were horrified by his murder because murder is wrong. If he is liberal, justice should be served for Kirk’s murder.

But honestly, all evidence/posts seemed to be pointing groypers.

Post and link the evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You guys. If this guy was a leftist Trump would be live on TV right now calling for martial law. The fact that he's silent, as are all of his goons, tells you everything you need to know. It's over.

Exactly. Except they'll hope that the guys on their side don't pay attention long enough to notice that the initial lies they told were indeed lies.

[Anonymous]

It is so weird to hear people actually say it is leftists. Just some imaginary group that gets the right wing nut jobs all jacked up. What kind of alternate reality do they live in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread has ZERO reputable news sources and zero links to news reports.

There have been plenty, but the MAGAs and bots infesting this thread would rather change the subject and pretend the killer was a democrat.

No, there has been none. Dcum is posting unverified and unlinked information with no sources.

Go read my blog post

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/weblog/2025/09/12/update091225

I have links.

For all the torturous mental-gymnastics in your blog post, desperately trying to hide behind “it’s complicated” to escape assigning blame, you missed the big picture here:

- one political party is a welcoming home to all the hateful people out there who are celebrating this murder (and that party is not the republican party).

First of all, no Democrats I know are celebrating this murder.

Secondly, Kirk himself celebrated the kidnapping attempt on Nancy Pelosi, and the hammer attack on her husband. So, try not to pat yourself on the back too hard.

Cite?

Go look at this social media feed from the time. sheesh.

Turning Point USA CEO and co-founder Charlie Kirk once said about the attacker of former U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul Pelosi: "Why has he not been bailed out? By the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out."

[Anonymous]

Laura Loomer & @LauraLoo... • 7/13/25
I don't ever want to hear @charliekirk11 claim he is pro-Trump ever again. After this weekend, l'd say he has revealed himself as political opportunist and I have had a front row seat to witness the mental gymnastics these last 10 years.
Lately, Charlie has decided to behave like a charlatan, claiming to be pro-Trump one day while he stabs Trump in the back the next.