For context: Most Asians couldn't become US citizens before 1965. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 marked a radical break from U.S. immigration policies of the past. Since Congress restricted naturalized citizenship to "white persons" |
....no |
Oh that was the Civil Rights Era. Who was doing most of the fighting to get this passed? That’s right. Mostly Black people. Also brown people and white liberals. |
" In the Senate, 52 Democrats voted yes, 14 no, and 1 abstained. Among Senate Republicans, 24 voted yes, 3 voted no, and 1 abstained." " In the House, 202 Democrats voted yes, 60 voted no, and 12 abstained, 118 Republicans voted yes, 10 voted no, and 11 abstained.[31] In total, 74% of Democrats and 85% of Republicans voted for passage of this bill. Most of the no votes were from the American South, which was then still strongly Democratic. " way to carry on that racism from the past, liberals. |
You might want to pick up a history book, and read about the souther strategy. Those southern democrats became republicans as a result of the civil rights movement once the republicans realized the could run on race. |
Today, liberals support policies that are raced based (identity politics), which by definition is racist. Republicans don't support these. What's what the record says, not the talks from you azz. |
|
You are correct on (a) but wrong on (b). History book would be useful ![]() |
Point I was making is that Asians are just lifting their heads up. Seems like the powers to be don't like it. Stay strong people. support what's right. |
Yeah, the republicans were somewhat liberal back then. The liberals left the Republican Party around th 70’s |
Specifically, support keeping black and hispanic kids out of TJ. Fight the good fight |
The republicans support openly racist policies. Idk what you are talking about. And the Democrats are often too scared to stand up to them |
That's what the white liberals want people to think - that Asians are the problem. While they are. They just want more for themselves. |
Lifting your heads up is one thing. Claiming that justice and merit are mutually exclusive is quite another. Narrowly defining qualifications for an elite institution in ways that just so happen to support your culture's attitude toward education.... yeah. |
Isn't that literally the purpose of the lawsuit? White enrollment stayed constant, Asian decreased, black and hispanic went up. The groups suing are claiming that the decrease in Asian enrollment is the result of discrimination. That discrimination is giving black and hispanic students are seats |