Which side would you like presented? What is going unsaid? |
For example, the presentation on the Depression was incredibly naive. As an economist, I think they could easily do better.
|
Go on…. |
It is considered discrimination to use geography as a proxy for race. |
Yay! Big government miraculously pulls us out of a Depression that only lasted eight years! FDR saves the nation! Hoover didn't care since he didn't enlarge the government enough. (He did expand the government: look it up.) FDR further expands the government and eventually going into war saves the economy. Never mind that no economic downturn had ever lasted that long in the past. I'm sure that there was no alternative view on what was happening and how to fix it. After all, the teacher didn't mention it. We certainly wouldn't want to look at the issues discussed in the 1936 election. |
Of course they can change admissions but the way they did it — secretively at first, statements against Asian American students my multiple decision makers, with no proper process, notice or public hearing— is not okay. |
Who made statements against Asian American students, and what did they say? |
Just read the lawsuit. |
You played yourself. You gamed the system to maximum exploitation and the system responded with changes; changes that broadened the net without stifling the pool of qualified students. |
The school board. They have been doing it for years, even before TJ admissions was on the table. |
+ 10000000 |
Oooh.... Such profundity... Can't DCUM do better? |
They just want to play victim. |
They don't need to. |
I actually don't disagree with you on this. You have a solid point. However, when it comes to AP US History, the job is to teach to the exam (yet further reasons why standardized exams aren't REALLY a great thing). APUSH teachers are evaluated on how well their students handle the exam, and TJ teachers do exceptionally well with this - partially, of course, because the admissions process has historically overselected for test-taking ability. |