Washington Spirit Virginia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know no one wants to believe it, but FCV isn't moving their outdoor practices to Springfield.

+1
Question has been asked and answered by the coaching staff repeatedly. Outdoor DA stays at Evergreen. No indication that it'll be moved. None.

What is the name of your club?

Everyone who cares knows the club was sold. Also, everyone who has asked the coaches directly knows where practices will be held. Not sure why you decided otherwise all by yourself. Shrug, believe what you want though.

The club is named after a facility. Keep telling yourself DA will stay 40 miles away from that facility.

And in fact, this time next year I look forward to the press release from the St. Hames Soccer Club.

John Cougar > John Cougar Mellencamp > John Mellencamp

FC Virginia > St. James FC Virginia > St. James FC
Evergreen > Evergreen / St James > St. James /Fairfax

I mean FCV told you all about this change BEFORE you paid your deposit so I’m sure you’re right and it will never happen. The new owners will be more than happy to keep paying on that Evergreen lease that keeps people out of their facility.

Look at what makes sense and is most likely more than what you are hoping for. No matter what your coaches tell you the ultimate decision is no longer theirs.

Dude relax. I dont even live in VA so I have no skin in the game but youre making yourself look like a fool right now.

To say a new owner of a club HAS to move their entire operation to one specific area is stupid. It shows you know nothing about acquisitions and the like.

If you saw the facility and the massive debt associated with that facility you would understand the situation better. If you saw understood the traffic distance you would understand.

The new owners are in the Gym business, not the youth sports business.

Damn, so I guess all the new Baltimore Armour DA girls will have to be driving to BALTIMORE since BALTIMORE is in its name? Dont be ignorant.

No but their practices ranged from SAC fields, the soccerplex and the Baltimore area.

VDA practices range from Longpark to Howison. So to say that FCV will not be practicing at Evergreen exclusively when no other clubs with different locations practices exclusively at one location.

And the difference is VDA and Armour are all club affiliations that requires such an accommodation for the partnerships to work. There are no such partnerships for The St. James FCV to worry about maintaining.

exactly, nothing is changing for baltimore armour, and nothing is changing to FCV

*Today

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know no one wants to believe it, but FCV isn't moving their outdoor practices to Springfield.

+1
Question has been asked and answered by the coaching staff repeatedly. Outdoor DA stays at Evergreen. No indication that it'll be moved. None.

What is the name of your club?

Everyone who cares knows the club was sold. Also, everyone who has asked the coaches directly knows where practices will be held. Not sure why you decided otherwise all by yourself. Shrug, believe what you want though.

The club is named after a facility. Keep telling yourself DA will stay 40 miles away from that facility.

And in fact, this time next year I look forward to the press release from the St. Hames Soccer Club.

John Cougar > John Cougar Mellencamp > John Mellencamp

FC Virginia > St. James FC Virginia > St. James FC
Evergreen > Evergreen / St James > St. James /Fairfax

I mean FCV told you all about this change BEFORE you paid your deposit so I’m sure you’re right and it will never happen. The new owners will be more than happy to keep paying on that Evergreen lease that keeps people out of their facility.

Look at what makes sense and is most likely more than what you are hoping for. No matter what your coaches tell you the ultimate decision is no longer theirs.

Dude relax. I dont even live in VA so I have no skin in the game but youre making yourself look like a fool right now.

To say a new owner of a club HAS to move their entire operation to one specific area is stupid. It shows you know nothing about acquisitions and the like.

If you saw the facility and the massive debt associated with that facility you would understand the situation better. If you saw understood the traffic distance you would understand.

The new owners are in the Gym business, not the youth sports business.

Damn, so I guess all the new Baltimore Armour DA girls will have to be driving to BALTIMORE since BALTIMORE is in its name? Dont be ignorant.

No but their practices ranged from SAC fields, the soccerplex and the Baltimore area.

VDA practices range from Longpark to Howison. So to say that FCV will not be practicing at Evergreen exclusively when no other clubs with different locations practices exclusively at one location.

And the difference is VDA and Armour are all club affiliations that requires such an accommodation for the partnerships to work. There are no such partnerships for The St. James FCV to worry about maintaining.

exactly, nothing is changing for baltimore armour, and nothing is changing to FCV

*Today

Another comment of zero value. You could say same comment about every club.

[Anonymous]

STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Is this another "I know you are" thing? No, I'm not, but it is naive to think any club can have new owner's and not change. Never happens ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Is this another "I know you are" thing? No, I'm not, but it is naive to think any club can have new owner's and not change. Never happens ever.

And its naive to automatically assume just because there is a new owner that everything will be turned upside down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Is this another "I know you are" thing? No, I'm not, but it is naive to think any club can have new owner's and not change. Never happens ever.

I think everyone expects some change just not the drastic life-changing stuff that keeps popping up on here. Not saying it’s you spewing it, just seems like there’s some poster on here with the daily ‘danger, danger leave, run’ garbage. Seems that for now, no one is doing that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Is this another "I know you are" thing? No, I'm not, but it is naive to think any club can have new owner's and not change. Never happens ever.

I think everyone expects some change just not the drastic life-changing stuff that keeps popping up on here. Not saying it’s you spewing it, just seems like there’s some poster on here with the daily ‘danger, danger leave, run’ garbage. Seems that for now, no one is doing that.

I'm not saying that. I'm only saying "don't be naive" to those who say nothing will change. The changes may be good overall for the club, even if some inconvenience a handful of Loudoun parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Well, when you pay your deposit before such an announcement is made you are a bit locked in at this point.

And I don’t think Spirit parents are necessarily rooting for the demise of FCV as much offering honest perspective as parents who have gone through this before. Spirit was also purchased by a millionaire who also made promises. It is wise for FCV parents to be skeptical and be critical this coming year. Make note of how the goal posts get moved throughout the year.

Does Sunday, regen practice during the season in the fall bleed into one weeknight in the spring? Does one futsal practice in Loudoun during the fall turn into two a night over the winter?

Do changes in branding occur slowly?

But the smugness that FCV parents demonstrated during Spirit’s situation while simultaneously ignoring the cautionary tale is baffling. Has anyone really asked why FCV was purchased? Why it was sold is understandable but why St James purchased it is really the only question that will truly answer FCVs future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Well, when you pay your deposit before such an announcement is made you are a bit locked in at this point.

And I don’t think Spirit parents are necessarily rooting for the demise of FCV as much offering honest perspective as parents who have gone through this before. Spirit was also purchased by a millionaire who also made promises. It is wise for FCV parents to be skeptical and be critical this coming year. Make note of how the goal posts get moved throughout the year.

Does Sunday, regen practice during the season in the fall bleed into one weeknight in the spring? Does one futsal practice in Loudoun during the fall turn into two a night over the winter?

Do changes in branding occur slowly?

But the smugness that FCV parents demonstrated during Spirit’s situation while simultaneously ignoring the cautionary tale is baffling. Has anyone really asked why FCV was purchased? Why it was sold is understandable but why St James purchased it is really the only question that will truly answer FCVs future.

Overall, that's a pretty fair post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:STJ FCV will absolutely change within the next year or less. Anyone telling you differently is simply selling you something.

Are you the same poster who posts this like once a day? It’s like you have some vested interest in seeing the club fail. No one else seems to be rooting as hard against another club except you. Lots of good players and parents are sticking it out. Just let it go.

Well, when you pay your deposit before such an announcement is made you are a bit locked in at this point.

And I don’t think Spirit parents are necessarily rooting for the demise of FCV as much offering honest perspective as parents who have gone through this before. Spirit was also purchased by a millionaire who also made promises. It is wise for FCV parents to be skeptical and be critical this coming year. Make note of how the goal posts get moved throughout the year.

Does Sunday, regen practice during the season in the fall bleed into one weeknight in the spring? Does one futsal practice in Loudoun during the fall turn into two a night over the winter?

Do changes in branding occur slowly?

But the smugness that FCV parents demonstrated during Spirit’s situation while simultaneously ignoring the cautionary tale is baffling. Has anyone really asked why FCV was purchased? Why it was sold is understandable but why St James purchased it is really the only question that will truly answer FCVs future.

I never assumed it was a Spirit parent posting it. I don’t know anyone who took delight in what went on at Spirit over the last few years. All these kids are old friends and teammates, they go to school together. The parents are friends and former teammates. I guess I missed the smugness, but I’m sure there’s some moron out there who made it appear we were all like him. Why St James bought it? Don’t know. Parents aren’t naive, as I said some change is expected and of course everyone is watching, waiting and asking questions. So far, the answers have been solid enough that I haven’t seen anyone run off. I think people have a hard time believing that both Metro and StJFCV can both succeed. I happen to believe they can. Neither has to hope for the demise of the other.

[Anonymous]

So in retrospect the rumors of FCV taking over Spirit have some validity but it was really a third party that was floating the balloon.

St. James was trying to get soccer moving in their facility and were generating zero interest on their own. So their choices then were to partner with a existing club or buy one. You can’t really buy a non-profit and the St James does not want to partner because they could only profit via concessions and halo memberships. This leaves buying a club as the only options and the only real clubs that they could buy were Barca, FCV and Spirit VA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So in retrospect the rumors of FCV taking over Spirit have some validity but it was really a third party that was floating the balloon.

St. James was trying to get soccer moving in their facility and were generating zero interest on their own. So their choices then were to partner with a existing club or buy one. You can’t really buy a non-profit and the St James does not want to partner because they could only profit via concessions and halo memberships. This leaves buying a club as the only options and the only real clubs that they could buy were Barca, FCV and Spirit VA.

Wrong. FCV was never going to take over Spirit. That comes from Christian himself. It actually turns out that the rumors of FCV being taken over BY Spirit we’re closer to the mark, given the financial difficulties FCV was gaming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So in retrospect the rumors of FCV taking over Spirit have some validity but it was really a third party that was floating the balloon.

St. James was trying to get soccer moving in their facility and were generating zero interest on their own. So their choices then were to partner with a existing club or buy one. You can’t really buy a non-profit and the St James does not want to partner because they could only profit via concessions and halo memberships. This leaves buying a club as the only options and the only real clubs that they could buy were Barca, FCV and Spirit VA.

Wrong. FCV was never going to take over Spirit. That comes from Christian himself. It actually turns out that the rumors of FCV being taken over BY Spirit we’re closer to the mark, given the financial difficulties FCV was gaming.

We’re = were and gaming = having. Stupid phone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So in retrospect the rumors of FCV taking over Spirit have some validity but it was really a third party that was floating the balloon.

St. James was trying to get soccer moving in their facility and were generating zero interest on their own. So their choices then were to partner with a existing club or buy one. You can’t really buy a non-profit and the St James does not want to partner because they could only profit via concessions and halo memberships. This leaves buying a club as the only options and the only real clubs that they could buy were Barca, FCV and Spirit VA.

Wrong. FCV was never going to take over Spirit. That comes from Christian himself. It actually turns out that the rumors of FCV being taken over BY Spirit we’re closer to the mark, given the financial difficulties FCV was gaming.

We’re = were and gaming = having. Stupid phone.

No, my point wasn’t that FCV was ever looking to buy anything. They were obviously sellers. But, the third party, IE St James may have been exploring both clubs either jointly or individually. Spirit was/is not in a position to buy anything and have demonstrated that they are not interested in youth soccer. What would be more likely to believe in a Spirit purchase of FCV was likely a purchase via proxy for the St James. Spirit may have felt they could flip the sale for a quick profit. In the end, they likely just lost a bidding war to the St James.