Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Indictment is here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxWf7ByYHM4JRzRKVHJrdUE0V0ZjdXV0XzBtQ1JhNmJkb1dR/view


Holy crap we the taxpayers could get the largest private home in Manhattan. See the forfeiture allegations at the end.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned


The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.


I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.


My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?


Can you tell me when its the right time to bring criminals to justice?


They’ve known for quite a while. Why now?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
^ If Barr doesn't deal with this correctly, it will be an even bigger problem. The American people have to have trust in our federal judicial system.


So we have one answer to why now. Barr. Another? Trump. Acosta.

Girls were being abused through Epsteino when Dems held the White House. Nothing done.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

It's not New York state by the way. This is all federal, just different district offices.


Why now?


See PP's comment:

"The Miami Herald just did an investigative series about it and some information came forward . . . I think it was the information that the victims in the Florida case were never told about the deal made with Epstein back in 200?. That triggered an investigation into how that case was dealt with and then maybe they got some more information that led to this?? Maybe someone else has a different take on it. It's beyond the charges . . . there may have been corruption inside the federal system down there and that's a whopping big deal. This is just the beginning I'm afraid. "
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
^ If Barr doesn't deal with this correctly, it will be an even bigger problem. The American people have to have trust in our federal judicial system.


So we have one answer to why now. Barr. Another? Trump. Acosta.

Girls were being abused through Epsteino when Dems held the White House. Nothing done.


Also while Republicans held the white House. Nothing done.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

It's not New York state by the way. This is all federal, just different district offices.


Why now?


See PP's comment:

"The Miami Herald just did an investigative series about it and some information came forward . . . I think it was the information that the victims in the Florida case were never told about the deal made with Epstein back in 200?. That triggered an investigation into how that case was dealt with and then maybe they got some more information that led to this?? Maybe someone else has a different take on it. It's beyond the charges . . . there may have been corruption inside the federal system down there and that's a whopping big deal. This is just the beginning I'm afraid. "


Yup. The U.S. Attorney for SDNY even said so in the presser. “Geoffrey Berman: “we were assisted by some excellent investgative journalism.”
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
^ If Barr doesn't deal with this correctly, it will be an even bigger problem. The American people have to have trust in our federal judicial system.


So we have one answer to why now. Barr. Another? Trump. Acosta.

Girls were being abused through Epsteino when Dems held the White House. Nothing done.


Also while Republicans held the white House. Nothing done.


Actually the Republicans, Acosta and Starr in particular, were the ones that covered it up and gave Epstein a slap on the wrist and didn’t even tell his victims.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned


The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.


I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.


My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?


The Miami Herald just did an investigative series about it and some information came forward . . . I think it was the information that the victims in the Florida case were never told about the deal made with Epstein back in 200?. That triggered an investigation into how that case was dealt with and then maybe they got some more information that led to this?? Maybe someone else has a different take on it. It's beyond the charges . . . there may have been corruption inside the federal system down there and that's a whopping big deal. This is just the beginning I'm afraid.


The links to Julie Brown’s reporting on this for the Miami Herald are at the beginning of this thread and everyone should read them. Just great journalism.


She should win all the Pulitzers for this reporting. It's been an incredible public service, what she's done - finally, finally helping get justice for some of the children who were victimized by this horrible man. (And his horrible friends.)
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As the Secretary of Labor, Acosta enforces underage trafficking. Yet just last week:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trump-wage-chief-adds-visa-hurdles-for-trafficking-victims

Rules were passed making it easier to traffic underage victims.


Pizzagate wasn’t just regular GOP projection, it was a straight up admission of guilt.


Maybe I sound like an idiot asking, but what do you mean?

Pizzagate isn't a topic that's handled well on this forum for obvious reasons. And whether PG is real or not, I do believe some children are at the very least, sexualized (Just watch music videos or scan ads.) and at the most extreme end, forced into sex slavery.

But what admission of guilt?

Surely you’ve heard the old saw that when the Republicans accuse Democrats of something nefarious, it’s because they themselves are guilty. So, so many people in the GOP have issues with sexual violence and crime. They’re the party that is making it easier to traffic people. They’re the party that blocks child marriage bans. There have been a SHOCKING number of GOP party leaders and campaign workers arrested for child pornography and associated charges.

Pizzagate got mocked on here because it was so obviously ridiculous, up there in sheer ludicrousness with claims that Hillary’s staff was into spirit cooking. And it was all to distract from the fact that the GOP really does have sexual dysfunction and criminal impulses toward children.


This. And then Acosta aiding in a cover up / extraordinary leniency. Disgusting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As the Secretary of Labor, Acosta enforces underage trafficking. Yet just last week:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trump-wage-chief-adds-visa-hurdles-for-trafficking-victims

Rules were passed making it easier to traffic underage victims.


Pizzagate wasn’t just regular GOP projection, it was a straight up admission of guilt.


Maybe I sound like an idiot asking, but what do you mean?

Pizzagate isn't a topic that's handled well on this forum for obvious reasons. And whether PG is real or not, I do believe some children are at the very least, sexualized (Just watch music videos or scan ads.) and at the most extreme end, forced into sex slavery.

But what admission of guilt?


There was nothing about Pizzzagate that was real, from the venue, to the people involved. Yet it resulted in an actual shooting based on total fake news. How can you type the bolded with a straight face?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned


There's plenty of info on the Epstein-Clinton association.

one example - https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-traveled-with-bill-clinton-kevin-spacey-2019-7
Billionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein once flew Bill Clinton and Kevin Spacey to Africa

"Jeffrey is both a highly successful financier and a committed philanthropist with a keen sense of global markets and an in-depth knowledge of twenty-first-century science," Clinton said through a spokesman. "I especially appreciated his insights and generosity during the recent trip to Africa to work on democratization, empowering the poor, citizen service, and combating HIV/AIDS."


I can't imagine that those connected to Epstein were UNAWARE of his "side business."



It wasn't a side business. It was what he did, and then extorted people when he had the goods on them.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Trump and Epstein live next door to each other in Palm Beach. They saw each other a lot. Epstein worked for Bear Stearns which was a major financier for Trump's businesses. Epstein and Trump have many links.

Epstein was like the drug dealer and Clinton was a user. As was Andrew no doubt. Epstein had information that could be used for blackmail. Very powerful. Trump was much more on the level of dealer than user. He was on the business side of things. His modeling agency is going to be looked at for sure. If you think the guy is squeaky clean, I've got a bridge to sell you. Lots of shady stuff with both of them.


What do you base this on? I would argue that both his modeling "business" and his purchase of the Miss America and other pagents fed his pedophilia appetite. He admitted to going into the dressing room unannounced, afterall.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned


The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.


I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.


My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?


The Miami Herald just did an investigative series about it and some information came forward . . . I think it was the information that the victims in the Florida case were never told about the deal made with Epstein back in 200?. That triggered an investigation into how that case was dealt with and then maybe they got some more information that led to this?? Maybe someone else has a different take on it. It's beyond the charges . . . there may have been corruption inside the federal system down there and that's a whopping big deal. This is just the beginning I'm afraid.


The links to Julie Brown’s reporting on this for the Miami Herald are at the beginning of this thread and everyone should read them. Just great journalism.


She should win all the Pulitzers for this reporting. It's been an incredible public service, what she's done - finally, finally helping get justice for some of the children who were victimized by this horrible man. (And his horrible friends.)


She is a leading candidate; here’s Dershowitz’s open letter telling them not to pick her. Somebody’s nervous.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/14003/pulitzer-prize-fake-news
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:As the Secretary of Labor, Acosta enforces underage trafficking. Yet just last week:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trump-wage-chief-adds-visa-hurdles-for-trafficking-victims

Rules were passed making it easier to traffic underage victims.


Pizzagate wasn’t just regular GOP projection, it was a straight up admission of guilt.


Maybe I sound like an idiot asking, but what do you mean?

Pizzagate isn't a topic that's handled well on this forum for obvious reasons. And whether PG is real or not, I do believe some children are at the very least, sexualized (Just watch music videos or scan ads.) and at the most extreme end, forced into sex slavery.

But what admission of guilt?


There was nothing about Pizzzagate that was real, from the venue, to the people involved. Yet it resulted in an actual shooting based on total fake news. How can you type the bolded with a straight face?


b/c I can believe that Epstein's sex ring is international - that its tentacles are long

I'm not specifically focusing on PG, but I do think politicians, businessmen and Hollywood are all in bed together.

I think these girls are pulled in internationally and nationally. I think kids crossing the border and those coming here from Eastern Europe for a "better life" are all targets. kids in foster care - in orphanages - runaways - neglected and abused kids -- ALL TARGETS

So if it's not PG, it's some other person at the end of that tentacle.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: