Labor Sec. Acosta accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein beat sex trafficking charges

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the Secretary of Labor, Acosta enforces underage trafficking. Yet just last week:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trump-wage-chief-adds-visa-hurdles-for-trafficking-victims

Rules were passed making it easier to traffic underage victims.

Pizzagate wasn’t just regular GOP projection, it was a straight up admission of guilt.

Maybe I sound like an idiot asking, but what do you mean?

Pizzagate isn't a topic that's handled well on this forum for obvious reasons. And whether PG is real or not, I do believe some children are at the very least, sexualized (Just watch music videos or scan ads.) and at the most extreme end, forced into sex slavery.

But what admission of guilt?

Surely you’ve heard the old saw that when the Republicans accuse Democrats of something nefarious, it’s because they themselves are guilty. So, so many people in the GOP have issues with sexual violence and crime. They’re the party that is making it easier to traffic people. They’re the party that blocks child marriage bans. There have been a SHOCKING number of GOP party leaders and campaign workers arrested for child pornography and associated charges.

Pizzagate got mocked on here because it was so obviously ridiculous, up there in sheer ludicrousness with claims that Hillary’s staff was into spirit cooking. And it was all to distract from the fact that the GOP really does have sexual dysfunction and criminal impulses toward children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the Secretary of Labor, Acosta enforces underage trafficking. Yet just last week:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trump-wage-chief-adds-visa-hurdles-for-trafficking-victims

Rules were passed making it easier to traffic underage victims.

Pizzagate wasn’t just regular GOP projection, it was a straight up admission of guilt.

Maybe I sound like an idiot asking, but what do you mean?

Pizzagate isn't a topic that's handled well on this forum for obvious reasons. And whether PG is real or not, I do believe some children are at the very least, sexualized (Just watch music videos or scan ads.) and at the most extreme end, forced into sex slavery.

But what admission of guilt?

Surely you’ve heard the old saw that when the Republicans accuse Democrats of something nefarious, it’s because they themselves are guilty. So, so many people in the GOP have issues with sexual violence and crime. They’re the party that is making it easier to traffic people. They’re the party that blocks child marriage bans. There have been a SHOCKING number of GOP party leaders and campaign workers arrested for child pornography and associated charges.

Pizzagate got mocked on here because it was so obviously ridiculous, up there in sheer ludicrousness with claims that Hillary’s staff was into spirit cooking. And it was all to distract from the fact that the GOP really does have sexual dysfunction and criminal impulses toward children.

oh, OK

Thanks for your explanation.

I disagree, however, that it's mainly the GOP that's filled with pervs. I hope the Epstein case, once completely cracked, will show how party affiliation means nothing to the elites. It's all a game to them. Epstein's contact list had folks from both ends of the spectrum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a real House if Cards and I can’t wait to see it fall down.
Democrat here who will vote for any sane party candidate with a heap of morality and love for the US. Clinton can rot too if molesting middle schoolers with braces...sick f$ckers all of them

It's not just his island; it's his plane, the Lolita Express. Epstein kept young girls on the plane for orgies. Clinton traveled on that plane multiple times. It's on the manifesto. He apparently traveled w/o secret service.

And Donald has his own plane and lived close to two of Epstein’s houses.

Trump also developed his own human trafficking company, aka Trump Modeling.

Trump launders money for the Russian mob, criminals who make much of their money from human trafficking.

Trump has been credibly accused of rape by several women, including one woman who was 13 at the time of the alleged assault.

May justice actually be applied to all those guilty.

all good points and a +1 on that last line

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting thread that puts it all in perspective as it relates to Trump

https://twitter.com/quinncy/status/1148025826140573698

I couldn’t follow any of that.

This Cummings woman is not exactly supportive of women. Say what you will of Ivanka's role, but she's bashing her teenage looks just to prove a point about Trump.

Regarding Trump's connections to modeling agencies, no doubt there was some "funny business" going on behind the scenes. But let the people slam Epstein first, as he's at the center of this issue. It will be like a huge spider web, with interconnected parts involving high-profile folks representing both parties.

I've been saying for a long time that there's a huge child sex trafficking network in the world. poor girls and boys farmed out to the elite

Epstein is one part of the picture. Look at Hollywood and its abuse of child actors.

In other words, it's bigger than Trump.

This Cummings woman worked at hiring models. She’s not knocking Ivanka’s teenaged face to make a point about Trump, she’s pointing out that Ivanka was very likely prostituted to get her career. There is a point about Trump in there (he started his own “modeling” company a year later), but the point is that trafficking is an enormous problem.

I would start with the bolded. Words like that are meant to convince you of something but are actually speculative in nature.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned

The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.

I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.

My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned

The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.

I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.

My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

Can you tell me when its the right time to bring criminals to justice?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned

The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.

I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.

My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

Probably all part of a nefarious plot to take Trump down

/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As the Secretary of Labor, Acosta enforces underage trafficking. Yet just last week:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/trump-wage-chief-adds-visa-hurdles-for-trafficking-victims

Rules were passed making it easier to traffic underage victims.

Pizzagate wasn’t just regular GOP projection, it was a straight up admission of guilt.

Maybe I sound like an idiot asking, but what do you mean?

Pizzagate isn't a topic that's handled well on this forum for obvious reasons. And whether PG is real or not, I do believe some children are at the very least, sexualized (Just watch music videos or scan ads.) and at the most extreme end, forced into sex slavery.

But what admission of guilt?

Surely you’ve heard the old saw that when the Republicans accuse Democrats of something nefarious, it’s because they themselves are guilty. So, so many people in the GOP have issues with sexual violence and crime. They’re the party that is making it easier to traffic people. They’re the party that blocks child marriage bans. There have been a SHOCKING number of GOP party leaders and campaign workers arrested for child pornography and associated charges.

Pizzagate got mocked on here because it was so obviously ridiculous, up there in sheer ludicrousness with claims that Hillary’s staff was into spirit cooking. And it was all to distract from the fact that the GOP really does have sexual dysfunction and criminal impulses toward children.

oh, OK

Thanks for your explanation.

I disagree, however, that it's mainly the GOP that's filled with pervs. I hope the Epstein case, once completely cracked, will show how party affiliation means nothing to the elites. It's all a game to them. Epstein's contact list had folks from both ends of the spectrum.

True. Remember Donny used to be a Dem. party affiliation means nothing to them, they chose what they chose for power. They are like the Medicis—if they could build a bridge to avoid walking amongst the downtrodden (a.k.a. All the rest of us) they would. Bring them all down. Dem or Repub.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned

The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.

I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.

My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

Can you tell me when its the right time to bring criminals to justice?

It's like that proverb about the best time to plant a tree. The best time is 20 years ago. The next best time is today.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned


The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.


I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.


My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

The Miami Herald just did an investigative series about it and some information came forward . . . I think it was the information that the victims in the Florida case were never told about the deal made with Epstein back in 200?. That triggered an investigation into how that case was dealt with and then maybe they got some more information that led to this?? Maybe someone else has a different take on it. It's beyond the charges . . . there may have been corruption inside the federal system down there and that's a whopping big deal. This is just the beginning I'm afraid.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

It's not New York state by the way. This is all federal, just different district offices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned

The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.

I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.

My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

Can you tell me when its the right time to bring criminals to justice?

The Public Corruption Unit is overseeing this, which means that there's a possibility of money laundering and tax-related charges. lol

It's a win-win for a takedown regardless of party affiliation!

[Anonymous]

^ If Barr doesn't deal with this correctly, it will be an even bigger problem. The American people have to have trust in our federal judicial system.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
There is not a doubt in my mind that NY is out to get Trump. Clinton is and has been linked to Epstein but you never hear that mentioned


The article cited IMMEDIATELY BEFORE your comment was quoted as mentioning Clinton. What's more, all of the liberals I see commenting online are crystal clear that they're more than happy to feed Clinton to the wolves if there is evidence he's caught up in molesting kids.


I don't know anyone who thinks that if Clinton was involved with this, he should be spared. Let every sick depraved evil person who was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking ring see justice.


My point is, why now? It's convenient to say "if Clinton was involved" but the reality is, New York has done nothing about Epstein until right now. So why now?

The Miami Herald just did an investigative series about it and some information came forward . . . I think it was the information that the victims in the Florida case were never told about the deal made with Epstein back in 200?. That triggered an investigation into how that case was dealt with and then maybe they got some more information that led to this?? Maybe someone else has a different take on it. It's beyond the charges . . . there may have been corruption inside the federal system down there and that's a whopping big deal. This is just the beginning I'm afraid.

The links to Julie Brown’s reporting on this for the Miami Herald are at the beginning of this thread and everyone should read them. Just great journalism.