NVA/Loudoun to MLS Next

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could McLean possibly get MLSNext if their boys teams are terrible?!

They could get put in the MLSN tier 2 which is kind of equivalent to ECNL-RL

Right, but that means that Mcbrave will need to get dissolved or still work to feed in their MLSN team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NOTHING IS CHANGING.

NVA would be crazy to leave ECNL.

How so? They would grow their boys program. Girls have never won anything in ECNL so… might benefit them lol

Wins? The ECNL girl's side is about college placement. There is little or no premium on winning. I would look at the revenue by gender if you can get it, especially at the ECNL level. At most clubs the girls side is the money maker. The boy's side is not even close.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NOTHING IS CHANGING.

NVA would be crazy to leave ECNL.

How so? They would grow their boys program. Girls have never won anything in ECNL so… might benefit them lol

Wins? The ECNL girl's side is about college placement. There is little or no premium on winning. I would look at the revenue by gender if you can get it, especially at the ECNL level. At most clubs the girls side is the money maker. The boy's side is not even close.

Considering most clubs have more boys teams per age group than girls, I would say boys are the bigger money maker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NOTHING IS CHANGING.

NVA would be crazy to leave ECNL.

How so? They would grow their boys program. Girls have never won anything in ECNL so… might benefit them lol

Wins? The ECNL girl's side is about college placement. There is little or no premium on winning. I would look at the revenue by gender if you can get it, especially at the ECNL level. At most clubs the girls side is the money maker. The boy's side is not even close.

Considering most clubs have more boys teams per age group than girls, I would say boys are the bigger money maker.

Correct, about 4-5 per age group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can we do a thread scrub. Confirmed guy is confirming both ways? Has anyone received VERIFIABLE information if NVA is or is not going to MLSN next year? Same question re GA?

I’m a NVA parent and haven’t heard any of this. I have the same question as you. Still haven’t seen an answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NOTHING IS CHANGING.

NVA would be crazy to leave ECNL.

How so? They would grow their boys program. Girls have never won anything in ECNL so… might benefit them lol

Wins? The ECNL girl's side is about college placement. There is little or no premium on winning. I would look at the revenue by gender if you can get it, especially at the ECNL level. At most clubs the girls side is the money maker. The boy's side is not even close.

Where is your proof or evidence of this. You are a girl dad and that makes it hard to get your head out you behind.

There is world of soccer around you that you have not seen yet. Boys soccer is rampant and brings in more than you can comprehend. And guess what having mls next does? Bring in much more.

GA is still placing kids in college, that’s not a problem.

GA is is placing significantly less kids in college.

You are lucky you aren't applying to college.

People, less is used when it is an uncountable noun. Fewer is used when the noun is countable.

For example, "Joe had less water than Jeff." And for fewer, "GA is placing significantly fewer kids in college."

It's not that difficult.

[Anonymous]

And by his stupid rules

Playing for Sporting Iowa ECNL is better than playing for a club like IMG.

What an idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we do a thread scrub. Confirmed guy is confirming both ways? Has anyone received VERIFIABLE information if NVA is or is not going to MLSN next year? Same question re GA?

I’m a NVA parent and haven’t heard any of this. I have the same question as you. Still haven’t seen an answer.

Had a conversation with one of the LS leaders and he said no changes are coming. Didn’t apply for MLSN and that the only changes coming to NVA are a new sponsor (bye Audi).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And by his stupid rules

Playing for Sporting Iowa ECNL is better than playing for a club like IMG.

What an idiot

Again with Sporting Iowa?!?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How could McLean possibly get MLSNext if their boys teams are terrible?!

Yet salesman is saying VRSC is getting it. Despite boys being mediocre in ncsl and EDP. Make it make sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we do a thread scrub. Confirmed guy is confirming both ways? Has anyone received VERIFIABLE information if NVA is or is not going to MLSN next year? Same question re GA?

I’m a NVA parent and haven’t heard any of this. I have the same question as you. Still haven’t seen an answer.

Had a conversation with one of the LS leaders and he said no changes are coming. Didn’t apply for MLSN and that the only changes coming to NVA are a new sponsor (bye Audi).

Meh. Kinda liked the jersey. Any idea who is the new sponsor?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How could McLean possibly get MLSNext if their boys teams are terrible?!

Yet salesman is saying VRSC is getting it. Despite boys being mediocre in ncsl and EDP. Make it make sense.

maybe mlsn2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we do a thread scrub. Confirmed guy is confirming both ways? Has anyone received VERIFIABLE information if NVA is or is not going to MLSN next year? Same question re GA?

I’m a NVA parent and haven’t heard any of this. I have the same question as you. Still haven’t seen an answer.

Had a conversation with one of the LS leaders and he said no changes are coming. Didn’t apply for MLSN and that the only changes coming to NVA are a new sponsor (bye Audi).

Meh. Kinda liked the jersey. Any idea who is the new sponsor?

Tesla.
Confirmed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we do a thread scrub. Confirmed guy is confirming both ways? Has anyone received VERIFIABLE information if NVA is or is not going to MLSN next year? Same question re GA?

I’m a NVA parent and haven’t heard any of this. I have the same question as you. Still haven’t seen an answer.

This post isn't going to age well. It's already a done deal. You'll be hearing about it soon enough when the announcement gets posted, that's already been drafted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And by his stupid rules

Playing for Sporting Iowa ECNL is better than playing for a club like IMG.

What an idiot

On the girls side your recruiting would be much better from Sporting Iowa. IMG commits are not great.