Trump says he's agreed to Fox debate while Harris sticks with ABC plan

[Anonymous]

The GOP is in trouble when sending an an empty podium to the debate is a better option than sending their candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

If you call that a fact, there is no real discussion to be had here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

Lol. She will be holding court and he will be an old man tweeting from a golf course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

Lol. She will be holding court and he will be an old man tweeting from a golf course.

Meant truth socialing.

[Anonymous]

We get it Trump chickened out when he realized he had to face Harris.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

If you call that a fact, there is no real discussion to be had here.

Why are you allergic to reality?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

If you call that a fact, there is no real discussion to be had here.

Fact: Trump was willing to debate Joe Biden any time, any place.
Fact: Trump is only willing to debate Kamala Harris under his preferred conditions.
You do the math.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

If you call that a fact, there is no real discussion to be had here.

Fact: Trump was willing to debate Joe Biden any time, any place.
Fact: Trump is only willing to debate Kamala Harris under his preferred conditions.
You do the math.

+1 He wants a Trump-friendly moderator and audience.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

If you call that a fact, there is no real discussion to be had here.

Fact: Trump was willing to debate Joe Biden any time, any place.
Fact: Trump is only willing to debate Kamala Harris under his preferred conditions.
You do the math.

Well if we’re doing math, we must factor in the concessions that Trump and his team made to make it easy on Joe Biden. Remember all that? So with that part of the equation factored in, he has every right to name his conditions this time.
And just to be clear, this is my opinion. This is not a fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

You sound scared.

^^
Example #1

Example of what? Harris will show up for the ABC debate and Trump will not. That is to both of their advantages. He avoids getting shellacked and she gets high visibility coverage for her campaign.

Example of becoming emotional.

It’s interesting you use that as an insult. President Trump loves to talk about big men, strong men, tears in their eyes. Now emotional is supposed to be an insult?

It’s not an insult at all. But when talking political issues, I prefer facts to emotions. But that’s just me.

The only real fact here is that Trump is desperate not to debate Kamala on 9/10… hmm.. 🧐

If you call that a fact, there is no real discussion to be had here.

Fact: Trump was willing to debate Joe Biden any time, any place.
Fact: Trump is only willing to debate Kamala Harris under his preferred conditions.
You do the math.

+1 He wants a Trump-friendly moderator and audience.

Unlike Joe, who couldn’t even have an audience, and had his mommy Jill come out and praise him afterward. “You answered every question!”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Trump campaign and Biden campaign negotiated the debates. If Trump has to follow the rules and venue of these prior debate negotiations, so does Biden. Biden needs to show to follow the negotiated rules. Period. Holding Trump to the standards he negotiated is fine as long as Biden does the same. It’s not fair or equitable to only hold Trump to fulfill previous commitments.

The agreement was made between the two campaigns, not Trump and Biden personally. And it's still the same campaign, just with Harris at the top of the ticket.

Agreement was made between campaigns, but agreement is made for Trump to debate Biden. The agreement does not state GOP nominee will debate DNC nominee, it has names. Biden/Kamala campaign now violating the agreement trying to substitute Biden by Kamala. If they want to stick to the agreement, they need to send Biden to the debates.

All of this just continues to prove how terrified you all are at the thought of trump debating Harris!

Your response just a proof how democrats cannot follow the agreement, the law and order. Don’t become emotional and throw “terrified “ into your argument. You either stick to the agreement your party made, or you are in violation of the agreement. Terrified or not is irrelevant. But when the facts are not on your side, you become emotional.

There is no agreement to debate on Fox, you Lying Liar who Lies, and casting Harris stepping up as the candidate as an attempt to broach the existing debate agreement is, well, weird.

Reading comprehension amrite? The agreement was made between Biden/Harris campaign with Trump campaign that BIDEN will debate Trump on ABC.

That's a copout and you know it. Trump's a coward, afraid to debate Harris outside of a friendly venue like Fox. Period.

[Anonymous]

Fox should invite RFK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fox should invite RFK.

If Trump debated RFK, I'd probably tune into Fox.