VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New to the thread. Female voter. If everything was consensual I question her judgement but not enough to vote for someone who doesn’t believe I have a right to bodily autonomy. If there’s another viable democratic candidate in the wings maybe, if not I guess we’re going to have an adult performer in the house of delegates. We’ve had larger embarrassments.

Oh, yeah. She's in my district. I think this was super dumb, but I'm still totally voting for her. And I don't think any of my Dem friends in this district would switch their votes to Republican because of this no matter how stupid they thought she was. We all know this entire election is about abortion in Virginia. However, there are also plenty of Republicans in my district too--especially in Goochland. But they are also mostly moderate country club style Republicans. I'm not sure how many of them want abortion to be illegal either.

It is kind of ironic since Roe was predicated on the right to privacy and abortion is an issue about a woman's right to do what she wants with HER body. We have very puritanical beliefs in this country, especially when it comes to women's sexuality.

It's already disappeared from talking points that I'm seeing. So maybe it won't turn out to be as big of a deal as I thought? Youngkin will run roughshod over this state if he can.

I'm also in her district but new to the area, like most of the people here. I'm voting with the party, I don't know a ton about either of the candidates.

Really? Know little or nothing about candidates but voting with "the party" (which I'm assuming is D)? Good job at confirming the stereotype of the typical West End resident. But that's just as bad as the Rs who pulled the lever for Trump despite not liking his antics. A few Rs I know who couldn't do it (yes, there are some) grumble about the results but can still look at themselves in the mirror in the morning.

You said nothing of whether you're OK with Gibson's activities, including playing the victim-card. If you don't care or can overlook it, than good on ya but if not, then withhold that vote or write-in someone, even if it's yourself. At least other posters here, unlike her, own their decision. Politics over pride, I suppose, or they simply either don't care or see nothing wrong with it/her. All of which, as in love and war, are fair.

But get informed. Don't be a sheep. Don't be one of those low-info voters.

Give me a break. All you have to know is that Youngkin will take away abortion rights as soon as he has the opportunity.

What low info? The Republicans have said what they want to do and you can see it all over the south and Midwest. There’s your info.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s kinda attractive in some way. But not completely. Not sure how to explain

It’s pretty simple. She’s old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

But sex work is real work, so we should all respect it!

She’s not a prostitute or a “porn star.” It also wouldn’t make her “scummy” to me if she were either. The only think I question is her judgement in not realizing or believing she would be found out. They should have at least covered their faces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, she’s a prostitute. But if you’re ok with that, fine. I wouldn’t vote for her… nothing to do with religion, don’t care for it. Scummy people are scummy people.

But sex work is real work, so we should all respect it!

She’s not a prostitute or a “porn star.” It also wouldn’t make her “scummy” to me if she were either. The only think I question is her judgement in not realizing or believing she would be found out. They should have at least covered their faces.

She didn’t make pornography? She didn’t sell sexual acts online?
And yes her and her husband’s lifestyle is pretty scummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New to the thread. Female voter. If everything was consensual I question her judgement but not enough to vote for someone who doesn’t believe I have a right to bodily autonomy. If there’s another viable democratic candidate in the wings maybe, if not I guess we’re going to have an adult performer in the house of delegates. We’ve had larger embarrassments.

Oh, yeah. She's in my district. I think this was super dumb, but I'm still totally voting for her. And I don't think any of my Dem friends in this district would switch their votes to Republican because of this no matter how stupid they thought she was. We all know this entire election is about abortion in Virginia. However, there are also plenty of Republicans in my district too--especially in Goochland. But they are also mostly moderate country club style Republicans. I'm not sure how many of them want abortion to be illegal either.

It is kind of ironic since Roe was predicated on the right to privacy and abortion is an issue about a woman's right to do what she wants with HER body. We have very puritanical beliefs in this country, especially when it comes to women's sexuality.

It's already disappeared from talking points that I'm seeing. So maybe it won't turn out to be as big of a deal as I thought? Youngkin will run roughshod over this state if he can.

I'm also in her district but new to the area, like most of the people here. I'm voting with the party, I don't know a ton about either of the candidates.

Really? Know little or nothing about candidates but voting with "the party" (which I'm assuming is D)? Good job at confirming the stereotype of the typical West End resident. But that's just as bad as the Rs who pulled the lever for Trump despite not liking his antics. A few Rs I know who couldn't do it (yes, there are some) grumble about the results but can still look at themselves in the mirror in the morning.

You said nothing of whether you're OK with Gibson's activities, including playing the victim-card. If you don't care or can overlook it, than good on ya but if not, then withhold that vote or write-in someone, even if it's yourself. At least other posters here, unlike her, own their decision. Politics over pride, I suppose, or they simply either don't care or see nothing wrong with it/her. All of which, as in love and war, are fair.

But get informed. Don't be a sheep. Don't be one of those low-info voters.

Give me a break. All you have to know is that Youngkin will take away abortion rights as soon as he has the opportunity.

What low info? The Republicans have said what they want to do and you can see it all over the south and Midwest. There’s your info.

Ah, so you're one of those one-issue voters. Just don't be shocked with other voters have a different "one-issue" or, gasp, see the world in shades of grey.

Not all Ds are abortion-at-any-time nor are all Rs never-abortion. And surprise, surprise, neither are a lot of Americans.

[Anonymous]

15w is not acceptable for many reasons. [/b]

Until the doctor says YOUR fetus has something terribly wrong with it at your 18w checkup.

The only moral abortion is my own abortion. (Or my mistress's)

[Anonymous]

Her husband seems like a total simp. I wouldn’t be surprised if this doesn’t end well for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Morning drive time radio stations in RVA are having a field day with reading and playing her transcripts bleeped of course. But hilarious nonetheless.

And this is extremely helpful in getting women to vote for Republicans.

Why?

I was being sarcastic. Because Republicans already have a major problem with attracting women to vote for them and mocking a woman for her sex life will not help their cause at all.

Women are more critical about these things than men are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

[Anonymous]

Consenting adults plus all the horny losers they invited via livestream who can apparently submit tokens for prizes like it's a gumball machine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s kinda attractive in some way. But not completely. Not sure how to explain

It’s pretty simple. She’s old.

That's like 20% of it. The humungous nose is like 50% and the horrible bolt ons are like 30%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know the story about how the VA GOP discovered her account.

Someone leaked it....but who? This is going to be an amazing story for a journalist.

As I understand it, she and her husband only "performed" live streams behind a paywall. So you had to pay to get in and see anything. And even then, it would not be archived and you had to watch them perform live. To summarize: (1) someone knew they were performing, (2) someone then recorded the streams, and (3) they then uploaded the videos to external sites not subject to a paywall.

Hence why she is trying to claim it's "revenge porn" - because someone then uploaded the videos onto external sites that can be accessed for free via a Google search without their consent. That's also a copyright violation, hence why she has a lawyer issuing takedown orders.

There's a really good story here for an enterprising journalists willing to dig into the details of political ratf#ckery.

The website they used doesn’t have any paywall. You can check it out now and witness all sorts of sickies.

That website gives "creators" lots of options.

The site is divided into six categories: female cams, male cams, couple cams, transgender cams, private shows and spy shows. The gender-specific categories are free to watch but viewers have to pay to join a private show. Spy shows are private shows where viewers do not interact, and hence they are cheaper to view than private shows.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturbate

"Private show" means they were behind an initial paywall. It is interesting that their stream was copied and uploaded elsewhere over a year ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know the story about how the VA GOP discovered her account.

Someone leaked it....but who? This is going to be an amazing story for a journalist.

As I understand it, she and her husband only "performed" live streams behind a paywall. So you had to pay to get in and see anything. And even then, it would not be archived and you had to watch them perform live. To summarize: (1) someone knew they were performing, (2) someone then recorded the streams, and (3) they then uploaded the videos to external sites not subject to a paywall.

Hence why she is trying to claim it's "revenge porn" - because someone then uploaded the videos onto external sites that can be accessed for free via a Google search without their consent. That's also a copyright violation, hence why she has a lawyer issuing takedown orders.

There's a really good story here for an enterprising journalists willing to dig into the details of political ratf#ckery.

It’s called opposition research. Everyone does it. There are facial recognition tools now that investigators use to scour the web looking for matches.
And it’s all legal.

This is probably how they discovered the content. Terrifying.