VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'd love to know the story about how the VA GOP discovered her account.

Someone leaked it....but who? This is going to be an amazing story for a journalist.

As I understand it, she and her husband only "performed" live streams behind a paywall. So you had to pay to get in and see anything. And even then, it would not be archived and you had to watch them perform live. To summarize: (1) someone knew they were performing, (2) someone then recorded the streams, and (3) they then uploaded the videos to external sites not subject to a paywall.

Hence why she is trying to claim it's "revenge porn" - because someone then uploaded the videos onto external sites that can be accessed for free via a Google search without their consent. That's also a copyright violation, hence why she has a lawyer issuing takedown orders.

There's a really good story here for an enterprising journalists willing to dig into the details of political ratf#ckery.

The website they used doesn’t have any paywall. You can check it out now and witness all sorts of sickies.

That website gives "creators" lots of options.

The site is divided into six categories: female cams, male cams, couple cams, transgender cams, private shows and spy shows. The gender-specific categories are free to watch but viewers have to pay to join a private show. Spy shows are private shows where viewers do not interact, and hence they are cheaper to view than private shows.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaturbate

"Private show" means they were behind an initial paywall. It is interesting that their stream was copied and uploaded elsewhere over a year ago.

There are entire sites that just repeat so called private content. But everyone know that content isn’t actually private.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how she calls the exposure of the videos an”invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family”.
How can someone be so stupid as to post something like this and not realize there’s an excellent chance it will later come back to “humiliate” them?

I think there's a level nuance normie people are missing. In her mind, she didn't "post" anything. They were livestreaming to an audience and she was under the impression that nothing would be saved or posted elsewhere. She (mistakenly) believed that they were doing something that was not permanent. Of course, that is a foolishly naïve mindset when it comes to the Internet.

It wouldn't surprise me if the website actually tries to coax creators' anxieties by having language that livestreaming is somehow "safer" and gives creators "more control" relative to posting permanent content to other websites. So might have believed that BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

When are you going to understand and admit that this isn't about what consenting adults do behind closed doors? We couldn't care less what kind of sex they enjoy. Go for it.
This wasn't "behind closed doors." It was on the internet for others to participate in and then she had the audacity to run for public office.

If it is all ok, why is she desperately trying to get the content scrubbed? Why isn't she proud of her porn site? Why not add it to her campaign website if it is all ok?

I question her judgment and her morals. I also do not believe she would be an advocate for what is best for children given her judgment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Are you aware of those data points that millions of voters have relied on for several centuries?

They are called APPROVAL RATINGS. Sorry if we decide not to approve of her completely stupid decision making.

Do you understand that legislators need to work with their colleagues within and outside of the party to get things accomplished? She humilated herself and proved beyond the shadow of a doubt that she is ill-equiped for office.

These are not judgements of two consenting adults making love in their own home, sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

When are you going to understand and admit that this isn't about what consenting adults do behind closed doors? We couldn't care less what kind of sex they enjoy. Go for it.
This wasn't "behind closed doors." It was on the internet for others to participate in and then she had the audacity to run for public office.

If it is all ok, why is she desperately trying to get the content scrubbed? Why isn't she proud of her porn site? Why not add it to her campaign website if it is all ok?

I question her judgment and her morals. I also do not believe she would be an advocate for what is best for children given her judgment.

I agree that it shows poor judgment for someone running for office.

I was addressing the PP’s comment that they do judge people based on what they do in their bedroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Gibson obviously doesn’t agree with you as she is trying to delete everything off the web.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love how she calls the exposure of the videos an”invasion of my privacy designed to humiliate me and my family”.
How can someone be so stupid as to post something like this and not realize there’s an excellent chance it will later come back to “humiliate” them?

I think there's a level nuance normie people are missing. In her mind, she didn't "post" anything. They were livestreaming to an audience and she was under the impression that nothing would be saved or posted elsewhere. She (mistakenly) believed that they were doing something that was not permanent. Of course, that is a foolishly naïve mindset when it comes to the Internet.

It wouldn't surprise me if the website actually tries to coax creators' anxieties by having language that livestreaming is somehow "safer" and gives creators "more control" relative to posting permanent content to other websites. So might have believed that BS.

The terms of service make it clear:

Warning Regarding Streaming Content. The Platform provides functionality allowing Community Members to stream/broadcast using their webcams. It is possible that other Community Members might, without your permission, unlawfully record, make copies of, store, re-broadcast, distribute, publish or otherwise share your broadcast online or through other media forms. You assume all risk for your broadcasts and hereby release and agree to indemnify and hold us harmless us for all actions arising out of such activities, including without limitation invasion of privacy, defamation, and/or intellectual property infringement. As noted in our Privacy Policy, all information and content you determine to share or stream through the Platform, including in "private" and/or password protected situations, is considered public information.

I hope the lawyer husband would have read the ToS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Lol, sex positive. Nope, nobody cares what either of these two people do EXCEPT that she is running for a political office where she will need to demonstrate good judgement which she clearly does not possess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Gibson obviously doesn’t agree with you as she is trying to delete everything off the web.

She didn’t knowingly consent to it being widely available.

I was talking about PP’s judgmental attitude. Why does she think her “morals” are any more important than anyone else’s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Lol, sex positive. Nope, nobody cares what either of these two people do EXCEPT that she is running for a political office where she will need to demonstrate good judgement which she clearly does not possess.

PP above said she cares what other people do in the bedroom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Gibson obviously doesn’t agree with you as she is trying to delete everything off the web.

She didn’t knowingly consent to it being widely available.

I was talking about PP’s judgmental attitude. Why does she think her “morals” are any more important than anyone else’s?

The terms of service make it abundantly clear what her agreement to stream her sexual acts for money over the service entail. She consented. Now she’s trying in vain to pull everything off the internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Gibson obviously doesn’t agree with you as she is trying to delete everything off the web.

She didn’t knowingly consent to it being widely available.

I was talking about PP’s judgmental attitude. Why does she think her “morals” are any more important than anyone else’s?

The terms of service make it abundantly clear what her agreement to stream her sexual acts for money over the service entail. She consented. Now she’s trying in vain to pull everything off the internet.

I said “knowingly”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Gibson obviously doesn’t agree with you as she is trying to delete everything off the web.

She didn’t knowingly consent to it being widely available.

I was talking about PP’s judgmental attitude. Why does she think her “morals” are any more important than anyone else’s?

Actually she did. Right there in her ToS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

Yes, we are well aware of that.

You do care what consenting adults do in their bedroom? Why is that?

I have morals.

1. It's gross that you're judging what other people do in their own bedroom. You really spend time thinking about it and deciding what is OK or not?

2. Everyone has a different sense of right and wrong and yours is no better than anyone else's. Many people in 2023 are sex positive. Sex between consenting adults is healthy and normal.

I don't get judgmental people who try to force their beliefs on others. That's not OK.

Gibson obviously doesn’t agree with you as she is trying to delete everything off the web.

She didn’t knowingly consent to it being widely available.

I was talking about PP’s judgmental attitude. Why does she think her “morals” are any more important than anyone else’s?

The terms of service make it abundantly clear what her agreement to stream her sexual acts for money over the service entail. She consented. Now she’s trying in vain to pull everything off the internet.

I said “knowingly”.

The TOS are just to protect the hosting company. The people who recorded did so without her consent and shared without her consent. It’s still a violation even if the hosting company is protected legally. She can certainly go after whoever recorded and shared it.