The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

If you want to drag her for her part in this administration, that’s one thing. But she’s actually looks fine- not great, not terrible. [cue poster who will say we’re friends]. But the idea that a 30-40 year old woman doesn’t prioritize hair, makeup, and clothes is giving some of you some really big feelings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

If you want to drag her for her part in this administration, that’s one thing. But she’s actually looks fine- not great, not terrible. [cue poster who will say we’re friends]. But the idea that a 30-40 year old woman doesn’t prioritize hair, makeup, and clothes is giving some of you some really big feelings.

Don’t mistake my disdain for this unkempt fascist for “big feelings.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

If you want to drag her for her part in this administration, that’s one thing. But she’s actually looks fine- not great, not terrible. [cue poster who will say we’re friends]. But the idea that a 30-40 year old woman doesn’t prioritize hair, makeup, and clothes is giving some of you some really big feelings.

This is a beauty and fashion thread to make fun of Trump admin women. A lot of us think Usha doesn't look great. This is the place to talk about it. If you don't want to read it, join a different thread!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

If you want to drag her for her part in this administration, that’s one thing. But she’s actually looks fine- not great, not terrible. [cue poster who will say we’re friends]. But the idea that a 30-40 year old woman doesn’t prioritize hair, makeup, and clothes is giving some of you some really big feelings.

This is a beauty and fashion thread to make fun of Trump admin women. A lot of us think Usha doesn't look great. This is the place to talk about it. If you don't want to read it, join a different thread!

DP. Yes, there needs to be thread entitled something like "The Glamorous Trump Women and their Fashion Hits" for the people who can't tolerate any hint of criticism toward Ivanka/Usha. They can go there to gush about their heroes.

That’s right. If anyone disagrees with your assessment, they must be gushing about them or their besties! Only your views are correct!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Also for the millionth time, I did dunk on Gwen Walz once. I said her messy little chode ponytail when her husband was announced as VP was horrific. Still better than Usha because she at least tried but not great.

[Anonymous]

Where are the pictures??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

If you want to drag her for her part in this administration, that’s one thing. But she’s actually looks fine- not great, not terrible. [cue poster who will say we’re friends]. But the idea that a 30-40 year old woman doesn’t prioritize hair, makeup, and clothes is giving some of you some really big feelings.

This is a beauty and fashion thread to make fun of Trump admin women. A lot of us think Usha doesn't look great. This is the place to talk about it. If you don't want to read it, join a different thread!

DP. Yes, there needs to be thread entitled something like "The Glamorous Trump Women and their Fashion Hits" for the people who can't tolerate any hint of criticism toward Ivanka/Usha. They can go there to gush about their heroes.

That’s right. If anyone disagrees with your assessment, they must be gushing about them or their besties! Only your views are correct!

Well, no, I think lots of us are happy for disagreement and discussion in this thread like “I think this dress was good” “I do not I think it was ugly.” Our problem with you is that every time Usha is mentioned you show up here to tell us how she is the most beautiful angel who ever existed and we’re all meanies with big feelings because she has gray hair.

Since no one has ever come anywhere close to saying she is the most beautiful angel who ever existed, I think you should work on reading comprehension in addition to working through your big feelings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Also I hate them but that pic of her and JD walking together and she's looking up at him is an objectively nice photo. One because you can't see either of their faces but also it's just sweet. Even fascists need love.

Staged

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

I'd think touring the world and performing 150 three-hour shows in 51 cities, managing your band/dancers/PR/support staff, writing and releasing two new albums, and releasing and promoting a documentary would age you more than being an attorney--but okay.

Whatever you say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

Who would compare a rock star and a former DC lawyer?

True. There's no comparison from a woman who generates one billion in net worth from songs she wrote versus...another lawyer from Yale.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

I'd think touring the world and performing 150 three-hour shows in 51 cities, managing your band/dancers/PR/support staff, writing and releasing two new albums, and releasing and promoting a documentary would age you more than being an attorney--but okay.

Whatever you say.

No, no rock star ages because of any of that. It’s the drugs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really like the dress and shoes she wore to National Peace Officers' Memorial Service earlier this month. Hair and makeup both look good.

I am ok with her hair and makeup in this photo. This is how one could plausibly go grey in public.

Not the dress. I think she just has bad taste. She’s like Ivanka except boring.