The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

She is only 39 and dresses like a depressed baby boomer wife who hates her husband. 39 is so young! She grew up with Facebook and instagram. All of her friends on social media are San Diego childhood and Ivy League college and law school friends. In other words, highly polished, stylish, affluent and sophisticated peers. It’s also worth noting she refused to move to the less sophisticated Ohio when he was running for senate. She stayed in California and then they moved to Virginia after he won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really like the dress and shoes she wore to National Peace Officers' Memorial Service earlier this month. Hair and makeup both look good.

She looks absolutely terrible here. This isn’t some Appalachian bumpkin he married, she is a pretty and highly sophisticated coastal-raised 39 year old multi-millionaire lawyer. The absence of effort over several months screams martial issues. She’s just showing up and going through the motions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really like the dress and shoes she wore to National Peace Officers' Memorial Service earlier this month. Hair and makeup both look good.

PEACE officer? Didn't they just fire all the people at the US Institute for Peace?

She does NOT look good here. Her dress is frumpy.

I think this dress is one of her worst picks. The fabric looks cheap, the neck is weird and is all wrinkled across her front — I can’t tell if it’s supposed to be ruching or if it’s just awfully tailored. Definitely a step back for her. Her hair and face look the same as always — I think it’s generally fine but she could use better under eye concealer and maybe a deeper lip color.

And peace officer in this context means law enforcement officer (cops and sheriffs), so nothing to do what institute for peace.

[Anonymous]

I miss Ivanka and Melania. This thread was much better when Ivanka was living here playing government and Melania was living in the White House. Now she just makes appearances.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

This. But correction: it’s triggering when a Republican woman doesn’t present herself the way the PP demands. Never when a Democratic woman dresses the same way - or worse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Right, she doesn’t care, glad we have that out in the open. It’s triggering to you, a woman, when another woman doesn’t prioritize beauty and fashion.

NP - she doesn’t have to be beautiful or fashionable. Mother Pence definitely was not. But she was well put together when representing our country. As someone said, that’s literally her job. Her only job at the moment and she has more than enough resources to do it. It’s not giving “I don’t care” it’s giving “I’m too good to be a political spouse”

Not the PP. I honestly don’t know what it is about Usha Vance’s appearance that triggers you so much more than any other political wife (Jill Biden, Gwen Walz, etc.). Usha Vance looks 100% better than either of those women ever did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really like the dress and shoes she wore to National Peace Officers' Memorial Service earlier this month. Hair and makeup both look good.

She looks absolutely terrible here. This isn’t some Appalachian bumpkin he married, she is a pretty and highly sophisticated coastal-raised 39 year old multi-millionaire lawyer. The absence of effort over several months screams martial issues. She’s just showing up and going through the motions.

What on earth are you babbling about? She looks great here. Are you the poster who is constantly projecting by making up fiction about a marriage you know nothing about? This thread is about fashion and beauty. Grow up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

Not sure who you’re talking about but yeah I’ve called usha sloppy and Gwen looks sloppy there so this is not some gotcha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

Not sure who you’re talking about but yeah I’ve called usha sloppy and Gwen looks sloppy there so this is not some gotcha.

Have you said Gwen Walz looked “unkempt and unwashed” and “looked like she had BO”? Because all of that was said about Usha Vance and whether you said it or not, you certainly didn’t object.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

Not sure who you’re talking about but yeah I’ve called usha sloppy and Gwen looks sloppy there so this is not some gotcha.

DP. Scroll up. Some poster was defending the difference between Usha and Gwen because Gwen tries. Interesting definition of trying, of course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

Gwen is a flyover state boomer, like 20 years older than Usha. She is a retired teacher with degree mill credentials. Married to a lifelong teacher and public servant.

Usha is the millennial child of millionaire Ivory Tower head honchos, raised in the most exclusive neighborhoods of San Diego, with Oxford and Ivy League degrees, and a high powered legal career. She is married to a multi-millionaire Ivy League lawyer, financier, and author, turned senator and vice president.

Usha and Gwen are not peers. Usha should be dressed as polished as princess Kate and Anisha Rosnah. She falls very short, to put it mildly. It’s embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

Not sure who you’re talking about but yeah I’ve called usha sloppy and Gwen looks sloppy there so this is not some gotcha.

DP. Scroll up. Some poster was defending the difference between Usha and Gwen because Gwen tries. Interesting definition of trying, of course.

Right? A wrinkled linen/cotton dress, cardigan, ugly brown shoes, unkempt hair in scraggly ponytail screams dowdy and IDGAF - not “trying.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

Gwen Walz appears to TRY - she doesn’t have the natural beauty Usha has - that’s why we are hard on her - she has so much potential and dgaf

Are you joking? Gwen Walz was extremely casual on the public stage. I mean, at least be honest. Where’s the rabid “unkempt and sloppy” poster?

Gwen is a flyover state boomer, like 20 years older than Usha. She is a retired teacher with degree mill credentials. Married to a lifelong teacher and public servant.

Usha is the millennial child of millionaire Ivory Tower head honchos, raised in the most exclusive neighborhoods of San Diego, with Oxford and Ivy League degrees, and a high powered legal career. She is married to a multi-millionaire Ivy League lawyer, financier, and author, turned senator and vice president.

Usha and Gwen are not peers. Usha should be dressed as polished as princess Kate and Anisha Rosnah. She falls very short, to put it mildly. It’s embarrassing.

Or… Usha knows exactly who she is and where she came from and has no need or desire to pretend to be someone she’s not. A lot of wealthy, well-educated women aren’t that interested in fashion. That said, I generally think she looks appropriate and fine. My favorite was her blue and white sundress she wore in India and the red arrival dress she wore there.

Honestly, this insistence that she become uber-polished and glam just to please some of you is the very antithesis of feminism. Not to mention the absurd idea that she’s somehow “letting down” or “embarrassing” her husband? What an utterly antiquated view. If she was a Democrat, anyone making those comments would be chewed up by the resident LWNJ mafia. But somehow, this same group thinks she should conform to their retro beauty standards. Weird, to put it mildly.

[Anonymous]

Look it’s a fashion forum. I mean, sure, Usha can not care about fashion. And then she should expect to get dragged on a fashion forum. If she didn’t care about the law and didn’t put any effort into it, she would get dragged on fora where people talk about that. If she’s comfortable with who she is and the choices she’s made w/r/t fashion, then I would guess she doesn’t care if people hate her ugly black dress with the weird neckline and wrinkles. Right?