The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She needs to wash that gray right out of her hair!

Why? Would you say the same to her DH?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She needs to wash that gray right out of her hair!

Why? Would you say the same to her DH?

+1
Or any other woman, for that matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

Who would compare a rock star and a former DC lawyer?

[Anonymous]

Her hair looks fine and she’s not doing the insane MAGA fashion thing this thread was created to celebrate/mock. It’s fun to talk about how Ivanka wore a mink hat and a sundress to the situation room. It feels unfun and mean to say some woman’s hair is too messy, even if I really dislike her. She’s not even in elected or appointed office.

Oh well. Nothing gold can stay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

Who would compare a rock star and a former DC lawyer?

+1 I can't compare myself to the celebrities who are my age. I'll never look like them without their resources.

[Anonymous]

I think Usha's naturally greying hair is what is so triggering to some people.

[Anonymous]

Usha could look great. I wonder why she is not embracing the help she could easily have.
I am kind of plain and don't really know how to do my hair and makeup but I would LOVE to have people to help.
Couldn't she have a hair and makeup person and a stylist, especially the for public events?
Why doesn't she? It would be so much easier.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Usha could look great. I wonder why she is not embracing the help she could easily have.
I am kind of plain and don't really know how to do my hair and makeup but I would LOVE to have people to help.
Couldn't she have a hair and makeup person and a stylist, especially the for public events?
Why doesn't she? It would be so much easier.

I agree and I think this is why Usha gets a rough time in this thread. She’s basically a DCUM, and a lot of other DCUMs would love a little more time and money and advice to look better. She has all of that but just looks blaaaaah anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Usha could look great. I wonder why she is not embracing the help she could easily have.
I am kind of plain and don't really know how to do my hair and makeup but I would LOVE to have people to help.
Couldn't she have a hair and makeup person and a stylist, especially the for public events?
Why doesn't she? It would be so much easier.

I agree and I think this is why Usha gets a rough time in this thread. She’s basically a DCUM, and a lot of other DCUMs would love a little more time and money and advice to look better. She has all of that but just looks blaaaaah anyway.

She doesn’t really care about her appearance, though. Or doesn’t care sufficiently and that’s triggering to many around here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her hair looks fine and she’s not doing the insane MAGA fashion thing this thread was created to celebrate/mock. It’s fun to talk about how Ivanka wore a mink hat and a sundress to the situation room. It feels unfun and mean to say some woman’s hair is too messy, even if I really dislike her. She’s not even in elected or appointed office.

Oh well. Nothing gold can stay.

I’m kind of split. Like, I think it’s pointlessly mean to say her hair looks greasy and unwashed and to mock her melasma. But I do think it’s funny and okay to say the dark circles under her eyes match the color of her soul.

[Anonymous]

I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

It’s always interesting to me when I hear comments about how men are so hard on women’s looks. But in my experience, 9 times out of 10, it’s other women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Usha's naturally greying hair is what is so triggering to some people.

+1
I personally wouldn't let my hair go gray, but good for her for being confident enough to do so. You're right, it certainly triggers some people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

And so, you would have felt exactly the same way about Gwen Walz, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see young Hill staffers every day who look like they spend more on their appearance than Usha often looks for PUBLIC appearances. She has ONE job for her limited duties - look like she intends to be there and represent the VP well.

It’s always interesting to me when I hear comments about how men are so hard on women’s looks. But in my experience, 9 times out of 10, it’s other women.

Absolutely this.