The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Here's Kimmy!

There must have been a dress code, because not only are the women in white, the men have white shirts and khakis, but why are their shirts not tucked in?

If the image doesn't work, https://www.instagram.com/kimberlyguilfoyle/p/DNW2aq8tnwq/?hl=en

Even fo

Following the dress code with her stamp on it: tacky too short dress, dark pantyhose(!) with white shoes that look like they're cutting into her feet. Where does she find these awful clothes?

That wig or giant hairpiece must be hot on her head all the time. Probably stops to scratch under it often.

The dress looks like something from Francesca’s at the mall.
Call me crazy but it’s a red flag when your hair is longer than your skirt. Unless you’re Cher—-but nobody is making Cher an ambassador. Although she would probably do a better job and be more popular with the local tesidents.

Probably? Are you kidding? Cher would absolutely kill it as ambassador to anywhere, especially compared to anyone in this administration.

Hell, replace sausage leg lady with Cher as Secretary of Agriculture, she would be better at that too.

Why does she always stand in such an awkward way? Her legs look like shapeless logs.

I have to look away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

And the lips.

It's too late. She is too altered to ever be lovely again. She will always be creepy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

And the lips.

It's too late. She is too altered to ever be lovely again. She will always be creepy.

If this is "Make American Beautiful Again" I'll take my chances on the ugly side....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

And the lips.

It's too late. She is too altered to ever be lovely again. She will always be creepy.

If this is "Make American Beautiful Again" I'll take my chances on the ugly side....

Or was it "hot again"?? Same same.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

holy f

Is she wearing pants? It looks like she is wearing dark panty hose , and no pants. Or is it just really skin tight brown pants? Such a weird choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

holy f

Is she wearing pants? It looks like she is wearing dark panty hose , and no pants. Or is it just really skin tight brown pants? Such a weird choice.

They look like pleather pants to me. Must be swampy in there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

Girl we don’t know what she looks like under the filler the filter the crazy hair and the makeup

As a reminder (bc when I see this I'm shocked) this is what she did look like:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I could see this being a weird angle, but we know she photoshops everything. So it's more likely to be weird photoshopping

Of course it's (bad) Photoshop. Look at the railing behind her! Two completely different sizes on either side of her. You can tell from her top as well - the embroidered flowers are different, one stretched out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

holy f

Who is that? She looks horrific.

[Anonymous]

HER LEGS LOOK LIKE LITTLE PIECES OF TURD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HER LEGS LOOK LIKE LITTLE PIECES OF TURD

No idea who she is but since she's next to Bobby Kennedy I assume she's one of his little MAHA freaks? I am not letting someone who looks like that lecture me on health.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I could see this being a weird angle, but we know she photoshops everything. So it's more likely to be weird photoshopping

Of course it's (bad) Photoshop. Look at the railing behind her! Two completely different sizes on either side of her. You can tell from her top as well - the embroidered flowers are different, one stretched out.

It's so strange to me that she needs to photoshop her pics and pretend she has a narrow waist. It's sad that she feels she has no other attributes besides her appearance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The photos are "throwing back" to a weekend celebrating some friends' anniverary.

If she lost the heavy eye makeup and extensions, she would be lovely.

Girl we don’t know what she looks like under the filler the filter the crazy hair and the makeup

As a reminder (bc when I see this I'm shocked) this is what she did look like:

But can she revert to this look but gracefully older? Unlikely.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HER LEGS LOOK LIKE LITTLE PIECES OF TURD

No idea who she is but since she's next to Bobby Kennedy I assume she's one of his little MAHA freaks? I am not letting someone who looks like that lecture me on health.

She's Brooke Rollins, Ag Sec. She has a weird wardrobe--not weird in the manner of Ivanka or all those strange sleeves during Trump 1.0, but in the manner of someone whose wardrobe was acquired a rummage sales.

I guess pleather might be useful for visiting the livestock buildings at the fair because you can wipe that shit off, but that just makes the color at least as horrific as the fabric.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HER LEGS LOOK LIKE LITTLE PIECES OF TURD

No idea who she is but since she's next to Bobby Kennedy I assume she's one of his little MAHA freaks? I am not letting someone who looks like that lecture me on health.

She's Brooke Rollins, Ag Sec. She has a weird wardrobe--not weird in the manner of Ivanka or all those strange sleeves during Trump 1.0, but in the manner of someone whose wardrobe was acquired a rummage sales.

I guess pleather might be useful for visiting the livestock buildings at the fair because you can wipe that shit off, but that just makes the color at least as horrific as the fabric.

Whatever pleather pants may be good for, I think they’re at the absolute bottom of the list of options for “public appearance by a cabinet secretary outdoors in Washington DC in August.”