The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s at the Vatican though. Are you even supposed to wear lipstick to the Vatican? And it’s still mourning or whatever.

It's not still mourning. She's in black because it's a papal Mass. Catholic queens wear all-white, everyone else wears all black.

And yes, you are allowed to wear lipstick at the Vatican. Every other woman had their hair done and makeup on.

Actually only the Spanish queen is allowed to wear white and they changed that rule after a Spanish queen wore basically a wedding dress to a funeral. Now the Spanish queen may wear white to a papal mass that isn’t a funeral.

I'm always intrigued by people who just... say things on the internet when they obviously don't know what they are talking about and in this case... just make things up?

Queens (or royal women of the highest rank in their countries, aka Princess Charlene of Monaco) of Catholic countries have "privilege du blanc", the privilege of white, wherein they are permitted to wear white in the presence of the Pope while everyone else wears black.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's Kimberley going as an American Girl doll for Mother's Day

Holy $hit, is that real?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand these makeup complaints. She looks fine/good to me at the military mom’s thing. Her dress is fine, her hair and makeup are fine. I don’t think there’s anything even worth commenting on here.

Most people have said her look at the military mom event was fine. What wasn’t fine was looking like an IT guy in drag at the Pope’s inaugural mass. Not a stitch of makeup with unwashed hair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/DJbyxVJxTWI/?img_index=3
Vance has a pic of him and her at the Military Mother's Day event, the dress she is wearing is pretty (white with floral on the skirt) and looks from her sitting pose like a nice fit and definitely appropriate but the hair is a problem.

Very pretty. How is hair a "problem"? I like it that way.

looks unkempt and greasy. I'm kind of a slob myself but would have washed my hair.

You can't be serious. Claiming she hasn't washed her hair just makes you sound incredibly foolish. The gray streaks don't mean it's greasy. Get a grip.

NP - I agree the hair is a problem. She doesnt know how to style it and apparently wont hire someone to give her a blowout and it looks frizzy/unkempt. You can have grey hair and look good - see Stacy London rocking greying hair. And those saying it’s fine she is going against the norm - she is a politicians wife, it’s her actual job. Please show us one political wife who is ungroomed when working? It’s giving Millennial who shows up to work in denim shorts or club outfits - it’s cringeworthy

The hyperbole is so over the top ^^. "Ungroomed / unkempt"?? Ridiculous. You may not like what she wears, but she always looks appropriate (except maybe the off the shoulder blue dress at the recent luncheon - that was weird). Her hair looks completely normal. I wouldn't choose to go gray, but she has and that's what undyed hair looks like. You calling her "ungroomed" just makes it clear you're not a serious person. And in no way does your 'denim shorts millennial' apply to her. How ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.instagram.com/p/DJbyxVJxTWI/?img_index=3
Vance has a pic of him and her at the Military Mother's Day event, the dress she is wearing is pretty (white with floral on the skirt) and looks from her sitting pose like a nice fit and definitely appropriate but the hair is a problem.

Very pretty. How is hair a "problem"? I like it that way.

looks unkempt and greasy. I'm kind of a slob myself but would have washed my hair.

You can't be serious. Claiming she hasn't washed her hair just makes you sound incredibly foolish. The gray streaks don't mean it's greasy. Get a grip.

Why don't you start an "Usha Vance is Beautiful and Amazing" thread since this one clearly triggers you so much?

If you're actually going to idiotically pretend the Second Lady of the U.S. didn't wash her hair, prepare for some pushback.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand these makeup complaints. She looks fine/good to me at the military mom’s thing. Her dress is fine, her hair and makeup are fine. I don’t think there’s anything even worth commenting on here.

I completely agree. But because you said anything even remotely positive about her appearance, you'll be called a "friend of Usha" by the moronic mean girls who seem to think only they can state their opinions here.

And if anyone has/had messy, "unkempt" hair, it was Jill Biden. Dear God.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

True, those are facts - but one is a glamorous superstar and the other is a woman who has never sought the spotlight and only recently found herself in it. And she looks like the normal woman she is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand these makeup complaints. She looks fine/good to me at the military mom’s thing. Her dress is fine, her hair and makeup are fine. I don’t think there’s anything even worth commenting on here.

Most people have said her look at the military mom event was fine. What wasn’t fine was looking like an IT guy in drag at the Pope’s inaugural mass. Not a stitch of makeup with unwashed hair.

See, it's comments like this that just make it clear you're not to be taken seriously.

[Anonymous]

I really like the dress and shoes she wore to National Peace Officers' Memorial Service earlier this month. Hair and makeup both look good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

True, those are facts - but one is a glamorous superstar and the other is a woman who has never sought the spotlight and only recently found herself in it. And she looks like the normal woman she is.

And therein lies the problem, PP. Nobody expects a late 30s woman in the spotlight, a political spouse who was a high powered attorney no less, to look normal. Once you make it to the level of political spouse, you need to look put together and if you're in your 30s and 40s, especially, you need to look like the type of person that others should strive to be. You want to be aspirational. Usha looks normal, but as a millennial woman in the spotlight, she needs to look better than normal. That is just the world's expectations. Especially nowadays.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really like the dress and shoes she wore to National Peace Officers' Memorial Service earlier this month. Hair and makeup both look good.

I don't like her dress but agree that her hair and especially her makeup look really good in that second cover. She covered up her dark circles and it makes a huge difference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw an instagram comment about Usha which said "Allow me to put it in perspective: Usha is only three years older than Taylor Swift." That's actually crazy to realize. I knew she was young but I don't think I realized she was that young.

And you can say what you want about Taylor Swift's fake ass relationship, cheesy music, whatever, but she's proof that you can look your age without veering into Trump wife territory.

1. Taylor’s probably older than most middle aged people think.

2. Being an attorney and mother of 3 ages you a lot more than being a rich, single, child-free woman. Part of Taylor’s job is looking glamorous. Usha is very new to having that expectation.

Not sure what this means. Taylor was born in 1989, Usha was born in 1986. Those are objective facts. One looks good, the other doesn’t.

True, those are facts - but one is a glamorous superstar and the other is a woman who has never sought the spotlight and only recently found herself in it. And she looks like the normal woman she is.

And therein lies the problem, PP. Nobody expects a late 30s woman in the spotlight, a political spouse who was a high powered attorney no less, to look normal. Once you make it to the level of political spouse, you need to look put together and if you're in your 30s and 40s, especially, you need to look like the type of person that others should strive to be. You want to be aspirational. Usha looks normal, but as a millennial woman in the spotlight, she needs to look better than normal. That is just the world's expectations. Especially nowadays.

I'm sorry, but this is so silly. Did Karen Pence look "aspirational"? How about Jill Biden? Your use of the word "need" tells me that you are a follower of trends and expect everyone else to be too. Usha Vance doesn't "need" to look anything other than professional and appropriate, which she does. Her age has absolutely nothing to do with it and certainly doesn't mean she somehow has more obligation to look "better than normal" than any other VP's wife.

[Anonymous]

She needs to wash that gray right out of her hair!