ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.


except they aren't targeting "narco gangs" Over 75% of the people they are apprehending don't even have criminal records. Please stop buying the propaganda and pay attention to real sources of information.
Anonymous
they....stole and sold his phone

https://bsky.app/profile/ericumansky.bsky.social/post/3mcdlnjmoqk2c

An American kid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:they....stole and sold his phone

https://bsky.app/profile/ericumansky.bsky.social/post/3mcdlnjmoqk2c

An American kid.


Of course. There’s another story about a kid that was taken for no reason held for hours and hours and grilled about the leaders of the local protests. Eventually, they just let them go. These are just Lawless thugs, but at least they’re now being identified even if it’s against their wishes
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The more people that watch the video, the less likely they can seat a jury.


That is categorically untrue.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.


except they aren't targeting "narco gangs" Over 75% of the people they are apprehending don't even have criminal records. Please stop buying the propaganda and pay attention to real sources of information.


Of course they are not. They are scared of being hurt. So they go for women and kids.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I’ve been saying forever that these are just shame masks.


Speaking of masks, even the Gestapo didn't wear them. They often dressed in plain clothes or standard SS-style uniforms to blend in or identify with other Nazis--but no masks.

We should stop comparing this time to Nazi germany. It’s much closer to to Jim Crow South. And they wore hoods.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I’ve been saying forever that these are just shame masks.


Exactly. If you have to lie about your job, you know it’s wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.


except they aren't targeting "narco gangs" Over 75% of the people they are apprehending don't even have criminal records. Please stop buying the propaganda and pay attention to real sources of information.


Of course they are not. They are scared of being hurt. So they go for women and kids.


Finding hard core criminals are harder because they aren’t in the system. They are plate reading the cars and finding people who are in the system with pending immigration cases. These people typically aren’t dangerous because they are trying to do the right thing and get their status fixed and often times pay taxes. A drug kingpin is going to be completely off the grid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.


except they aren't targeting "narco gangs" Over 75% of the people they are apprehending don't even have criminal records. Please stop buying the propaganda and pay attention to real sources of information.


Of course they are not. They are scared of being hurt. So they go for women and kids.


Finding hard core criminals are harder because they aren’t in the system. They are plate reading the cars and finding people who are in the system with pending immigration cases. These people typically aren’t dangerous because they are trying to do the right thing and get their status fixed and often times pay taxes. A drug kingpin is going to be completely off the grid.


So they are just passing time violating our rights, beating women and children doing all of the other horrible things that we’ve witnessed them doing?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The more people that watch the video, the less likely they can seat a jury.


That is categorically untrue.


Just wait. I saw a stat that up to 82% of people in the U.S. have seen the video. All have accessed it through a biased source, either right or left. Good luck with impartiality.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I’ve been saying forever that these are just shame masks.


Speaking of masks, even the Gestapo didn't wear them. They often dressed in plain clothes or standard SS-style uniforms to blend in or identify with other Nazis--but no masks.


There is a German guy I follow who is a historian and whose grandfather was a Nazi. He was recently talking about how this group is less like the Klan and more like slave patrols. He’s also pretty surprised the way that people protect despite personal risk. The Germans never bothered.


I had family in Germany during the Nazi regime. That is not true.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


I’ve been saying forever that these are just shame masks.


Speaking of masks, even the Gestapo didn't wear them. They often dressed in plain clothes or standard SS-style uniforms to blend in or identify with other Nazis--but no masks.


There is a German guy I follow who is a historian and whose grandfather was a Nazi. He was recently talking about how this group is less like the Klan and more like slave patrols. He’s also pretty surprised the way that people protect despite personal risk. The Germans never bothered.


I had family in Germany during the Nazi regime. That is not true.


At this scale they did not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.


except they aren't targeting "narco gangs" Over 75% of the people they are apprehending don't even have criminal records. Please stop buying the propaganda and pay attention to real sources of information.


Of course they are not. They are scared of being hurt. So they go for women and kids.


Finding hard core criminals are harder because they aren’t in the system. They are plate reading the cars and finding people who are in the system with pending immigration cases. These people typically aren’t dangerous because they are trying to do the right thing and get their status fixed and often times pay taxes. A drug kingpin is going to be completely off the grid.


So they are just passing time violating our rights, beating women and children doing all of the other horrible things that we’ve witnessed them doing?


Yes. That’s exactly what they’re doing. It was reported in all major news outlets in mid 2025 that ICE said it was too costly to go after criminals and Miller wanted more arrests. There was a report saying they weren’t successfully deporting detainees. Women and children and Target workers (brown citizens) are low hanging fruit. Besides, President Miller is salivating at the violence. He loves it!

Even after the massive budget increase in the BBB they haven’t started focusing on criminal gangs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The more people that watch the video, the less likely they can seat a jury.


That is categorically untrue.


Just wait. I saw a stat that up to 82% of people in the U.S. have seen the video. All have accessed it through a biased source, either right or left. Good luck with impartiality.


Guess that we can’t have a trial for the guy that they say shot Charlie Kirk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


The more people that watch the video, the less likely they can seat a jury.


That is categorically untrue.


Just wait. I saw a stat that up to 82% of people in the U.S. have seen the video. All have accessed it through a biased source, either right or left. Good luck with impartiality.


You could show me the same video in Fox News and I’d think the same thing.

I believe my eyes.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: