Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

Screen shot from Avenatti twitter account. Avenatti posted his list of questions for Grassley's Senate Judiciary nominating committee head detailing a list of questions that they would like to know about alleged gang rape that involved presumably Judge and Kavanaugh

Who is making an allegation of gang rape, and it seems mighty unprofessional for an attorney to post his list of questions on twitter. Is this normal protocol?

Really, with the crazy sh*t that trump's lawyers have said and done, THIS is what you think is not "normal protocol?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

Go for it, as long as you do it with your name attached to it and say that you want the FBI to investigate fully.

Why not? He would be able to inflect a considerable amount of damage, and no one would be able to prove he was lying.

[Anonymous]

The left had played this so masterfully that the mind reels. I mean, Grassley, on Friday, was reduced to a bizarrely tweeting wreck, it appears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

Screen shot from Avenatti twitter account. Avenatti posted his list of questions for Grassley's Senate Judiciary nominating committee head detailing a list of questions that they would like to know about alleged gang rape that involved presumably Judge and Kavanaugh

Who is making an allegation of gang rape, and it seems mighty unprofessional for an attorney to post his list of questions on twitter. Is this normal protocol?

Avenatti wants to be our next President. He knows exactly how to win his party's nomination. Sweet!

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

No, he RAPED you. I saw him! I swear!

Yeah, you two are not even brave enough to put your name on a DCUM post but you want us to believe you would endure the hell that Ford and Ramirez are facing?

Oh please, they’re the darlings of the left right now. They will be taken care of and I’m sure celebrated in their liberal bubble social circles.

[Anonymous]

He’s done. Let’s stipulate to that.

[Anonymous]

From the Farrow article, if the name Louisa Garry—one of Brett Kavanaugh’s Yale classmates disputing Deborah Ramirez’s sexual misconduct claim— looks familiar, it might because she was recently featured in a pro-Kavanaugh ad by 501(c)(4) "dark money" group Judicial Crisis Network

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

Terrific. provide a polygraph.

It’ll be a few years from now, so I can already say I mentioned it in 2018.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

Go for it, as long as you do it with your name attached to it and say that you want the FBI to investigate fully.

Why not? He would be able to inflect a considerable amount of damage, and no one would be able to prove he was lying.

There are plenty of conservative picks that could have been made, Barnett, Thapar, others. None of them would reduce the country or DCUM to this level.

Don't blame this on MeToo or Democrats. Blame this on Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s not surprising that more women came out. There are almost certainly others who are still keeping quiet. Kavanaugh really ought to pull the plug on this nomination. If he makes it to the court under this cloud through a rushed process, many will see him and the entire court as illegitimate. That’s not what the country needs.

Why not? It would just make a second branch illegitimate in the eyes of many (nay, most)?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

Terrific. provide a polygraph.

It’ll be a few years from now, so I can already say I mentioned it in 2018.

Yes, and it will be really effective since you said you would make it up in advance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

Go for it, as long as you do it with your name attached to it and say that you want the FBI to investigate fully.

Why not? He would be able to inflect a considerable amount of damage, and no one would be able to prove he was lying.

There are plenty of conservative picks that could have been made, Barnett, Thapar, others. None of them would reduce the country or DCUM to this level.

Don't blame this on MeToo or Democrats. Blame this on Kavanaugh

Libs will get the most conservative woman in the country. Then you'll be wishing you got BK. Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what makes your post so utterly ridiculous? This may come as a shock to you, but Republicans are also, <gasp> victims of sexual assault. You think they don’t care about victims when they are victims themselves? Do you even comprehend how ridiculous you sound?

Most of us are highly critical of the version of events Dr. Ford is putting forward because they lack details, the others she said were present are disputing her account, some of the details she has claimed are contradictory to other statements she presumably has made, and it happened 36 years ago.

Do you really suppose that surprises me?

To a woman, every Republican woman on this thread who is also a victim of sexual violence has had nothing but criticism for Kavanaugh’s alleged victim. When she was anonymous, she was a coward. When she came forward, it wasn’t fast enough. She shouldn’t have come forward if she didn’t report it back that. She shouldn’t have come forward at all because it doesn’t rise to the level of serious enough in your minds. You rely on biased, right wing media that feeds you the most anti-woman, anti-victim predictable smears.

Do you know why I suspect you all do this, beyond a partisan zeal that that small segment of remaining Republican women share? I think you do it because you have internalized all the nasty, misogynist messages you’ve been fed. On some level you think it’s her fault that this happened and you think it’s your fault that you were assaulted. It is not your fault that he assaulted you. It’s not. You didn’t do anything wrong. You could report or not, as feels comfortable to you. You can talk about it now or not. But I do pray that you find peace and benefit of the doubt for a fellow victim. Peace be with you.

You can't possibly back this up. A couple of these women are saying that flimsy allegations like Ford's undermines women assault victims who do have substantial allegations.

Exactly. I don't know whether Ford is telling the truth or not. Her account seems credible. But with zero evidence or witnesses, and three decades since the alleged incident occurred - is it any wonder many people are doubtful? And accounts like this - in which NO RAPE even occurred - really do diminish the real victims of sexual assault. No wonder women are looked at as silly. Situations like this certainly don't help.

If it is so flimsy, should be very easy to dismiss with an FBI investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ll just go on the record now and say when the next democrat nominates someone, I will claim they touched me when I was a little boy.

Go for it, as long as you do it with your name attached to it and say that you want the FBI to investigate fully.

Why not? He would be able to inflect a considerable amount of damage, and no one would be able to prove he was lying.

There are plenty of conservative picks that could have been made, Barnett, Thapar, others. None of them would reduce the country or DCUM to this level.

Don't blame this on MeToo or Democrats. Blame this on Kavanaugh

Libs will get the most conservative woman in the country. Then you'll be wishing you got BK. Lol.

Oh, it's so gratifying to see you struggle to find that silver lining in this debacle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

Screen shot from Avenatti twitter account. Avenatti posted his list of questions for Grassley's Senate Judiciary nominating committee head detailing a list of questions that they would like to know about alleged gang rape that involved presumably Judge and Kavanaugh

Who is making an allegation of gang rape, and it seems mighty unprofessional for an attorney to post his list of questions on twitter. Is this normal protocol?

Counsel for the Senate Judiciary committee demanded to know about his client's allegations after Avennatti had alluded vaguely to them on Twitter. Avennatti responded to that demand with a summary and a list of questions the committee should ask Kavanaugh. Then posted the response on Twitter.