Where’s Melania?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Start with not having people lie on your behalf.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.


I'm sure Betty Ford and other first ladies did not want everyone to know everything either. It comes with the job, if your spouse wants to be president.

On the other hand, a precedent is being set so that the next Democrat president can lie about their spouses whereabouts or not tell the American public where they are or where their tax dollars are going. And they can point to the new Republican "tradition" Trump has started.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.


I'm sure Betty Ford and other first ladies did not want everyone to know everything either. It comes with the job, if your spouse wants to be president.

On the other hand, a precedent is being set so that the next Democrat president can lie about their spouses whereabouts or not tell the American public where they are or where their tax dollars are going. And they can point to the new Republican "tradition" Trump has started.

Nope. Only Repubs get to behave like this. Judicial Watch and Faux News will be all over any Democrat who pulls even a tenth of this crap.
Anonymous
I hope she ran off with another man.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.


I'm sure Betty Ford and other first ladies did not want everyone to know everything either. It comes with the job, if your spouse wants to be president.

On the other hand, a precedent is being set so that the next Democrat president can lie about their spouses whereabouts or not tell the American public where they are or where their tax dollars are going. And they can point to the new Republican "tradition" Trump has started.

Nope. Only Repubs get to behave like this. Judicial Watch and Faux News will be all over any Democrat who pulls even a tenth of this crap.



Of what crap? There are zero facts to support any of the wild conspiracy theories being flung here.

It’s like a bunch of hypocritical old church ladies gossiping about a “loose woman.” It’s utterly ridiculous.

Michelle Obama’s mother lived in the White House off of taxpayer money for 8 years and nary a word was uttered.

It was their family situation and really not our business.

Taxpayer money pays for lots of things I oppose; if you don’t like it, run for office and change it.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.


I'm sure Betty Ford and other first ladies did not want everyone to know everything either. It comes with the job, if your spouse wants to be president.

On the other hand, a precedent is being set so that the next Democrat president can lie about their spouses whereabouts or not tell the American public where they are or where their tax dollars are going. And they can point to the new Republican "tradition" Trump has started.

Nope. Only Repubs get to behave like this. Judicial Watch and Faux News will be all over any Democrat who pulls even a tenth of this crap.



Of what crap? There are zero facts to support any of the wild conspiracy theories being flung here.

It’s like a bunch of hypocritical old church ladies gossiping about a “loose woman.” It’s utterly ridiculous.

Michelle Obama’s mother lived in the White House off of taxpayer money for 8 years and nary a word was uttered.

It was their family situation and really not our business.

Taxpayer money pays for lots of things I oppose; if you don’t like it, run for office and change it.



Nary a word was uttered? What color is the sky on your planet?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.


Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.


I'm sure Betty Ford and other first ladies did not want everyone to know everything either. It comes with the job, if your spouse wants to be president.

On the other hand, a precedent is being set so that the next Democrat president can lie about their spouses whereabouts or not tell the American public where they are or where their tax dollars are going. And they can point to the new Republican "tradition" Trump has started.

Nope. Only Repubs get to behave like this. Judicial Watch and Faux News will be all over any Democrat who pulls even a tenth of this crap.



Of what crap? There are zero facts to support any of the wild conspiracy theories being flung here.

It’s like a bunch of hypocritical old church ladies gossiping about a “loose woman.” It’s utterly ridiculous.

Michelle Obama’s mother lived in the White House off of taxpayer money for 8 years and nary a word was uttered.

It was their family situation and really not our business.

Taxpayer money pays for lots of things I oppose; if you don’t like it, run for office and change it.



+1 Well stated.
Anonymous
What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.


And, all your bitching and moaning won’t change the fact that Melania is a private person and will not make a public appearance until she is good and ready.
So, continue with your conspiracy theories, your housewife gossip, and your no-proof speculation. It won’t change a thing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.



So there should be an investigation right now on Melania’s whereabouts?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.


Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.


Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.


Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.


Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.


Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?


Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.


Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.


Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?


Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.


DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: