Where’s Melania?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.

Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.

Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?

Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.

DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.

First of all, someone else brought up JW.

If you don’t like JW, don’t read it, and donate to whatever liberal version of JW exists.

Better yet, FOIA the Trump administration yourself and blog it. Knock yourself out, oh outraged one.

FOIA is good. Not everyone is on your side.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.

Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.

Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?

Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.

DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.

First of all, someone else brought up JW.

If you don’t like JW, don’t read it, and donate to whatever liberal version of JW exists.

Better yet, FOIA the Trump administration yourself and blog it. Knock yourself out, oh outraged one.

FOIA is good. Not everyone is on your side.

Lol, that’s a pathetic distraction.

The Trump admin is corrupt like none other and Judicial Watch has nothing to say? That’s strange, isn’t it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.

Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.

Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?

Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.

DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.

First of all, someone else brought up JW.

If you don’t like JW, don’t read it, and donate to whatever liberal version of JW exists.



Better yet, FOIA the Trump administration yourself and blog it. Knock yourself out, oh outraged one.

FOIA is good. Not everyone is on your side.

Lol, that’s a pathetic distraction.

The Trump admin is corrupt like none other and Judicial Watch has nothing to say? That’s strange, isn’t it?

Ge the liberal version of JW on his a@@, whiny. Not everyone is going to be on your side and care about what you care about.

Talk about tone deaf.

[Anonymous]

So who is going to head up the Melania Trump investigatory committee?

The American public is going to love their tax dollars spent on attacking the FLOTUS after surgery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.

Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.

Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?

Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.

DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.

First of all, someone else brought up JW.

If you don’t like JW, don’t read it, and donate to whatever liberal version of JW exists.

Better yet, FOIA the Trump administration yourself and blog it. Knock yourself out, oh outraged one.

FOIA is good. Not everyone is on your side.

Lol, that’s a pathetic distraction.

The Trump admin is corrupt like none other and Judicial Watch has nothing to say? That’s strange, isn’t it?

Google Tom Fitton, Ginni Thomas (Clarence’s wife) and Groundswell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So who is going to head up the Melania Trump investigatory committee?

The American public is going to love their tax dollars spent on attacking the FLOTUS after surgery.

It needs to be done, whether the public agrees with it or not. Remember, we elected a president whose job is to do what needs to be done, not give flowery eloquent speeches. The same principle applies here to ensure responsible use of public funds from American taxpayers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.

Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.

Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?

Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.

DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.

First of all, someone else brought up JW.

If you don’t like JW, don’t read it, and donate to whatever liberal version of JW exists.

Better yet, FOIA the Trump administration yourself and blog it. Knock yourself out, oh outraged one.

FOIA is good. Not everyone is on your side.

Lol, that’s a pathetic distraction.

The Trump admin is corrupt like none other and Judicial Watch has nothing to say? That’s strange, isn’t it?

Google Tom Fitton, Ginni Thomas (Clarence’s wife) and Groundswell.

.

What other names come up? Steve Bannon. John Bolton. Frank Gaffney. Michael Flynn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What crap? We don't know. I actually feel sorry for Melania, she seems like the best one of an awful group of people.

But we won't put up with it when judicial watch and faux news wanted to attack a Democrat POTUSand FLOTUS all the time.

Hypocritical conservatives can stuff it, at this point, if you can't tolerate the same behavior you pushed.

Judicial Watch uses FOIA to look at taxpayer dollars spent.

They don’t make it up; it’s there in black and white.

Oh? Have they been the ones to FOIA any of the disgusting spending excesses by this administration? Did they uncover the first class flights, the office dining room set, the soundproof phone booth, the bulletproof seats in a government car, the hundreds of hours of USSS overtime, the government flight to view the eclipse, that have cost us millions of taxpayer dollars? What have they been working on lately?

Can’t you go to their website and check?

Judicial Watch covered the Obama administration because the media refused.

But now Trump is in office, the media isn’t scared of being called “racist” so they are sort of doing their jobs again.

DP here. I went to their website and checked. The front page is all anti-Democrat and pro-Trump "findings." Timely topics like Clinton emails. Surely after 18 months, they could find ONE thing to FOIA that doesn't look good for Trump and isn't covered by the media. They are very selective in what they submit FOIA requests for. You should broaden your reading materials.

First of all, someone else brought up JW.

If you don’t like JW, don’t read it, and donate to whatever liberal version of JW exists.



Better yet, FOIA the Trump administration yourself and blog it. Knock yourself out, oh outraged one.

FOIA is good. Not everyone is on your side.

Lol, that’s a pathetic distraction.

The Trump admin is corrupt like none other and Judicial Watch has nothing to say? That’s strange, isn’t it?

Ge the liberal version of JW on his a@@, whiny. Not everyone is going to be on your side and care about what you care about.

Talk about tone deaf.

Says the hypocrite.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would not want the world to know my personal health issues.

Then you shouldn't be married to POTUS, or live off of taxpayer funds.

I'm sure Betty Ford and other first ladies did not want everyone to know everything either. It comes with the job, if your spouse wants to be president.

On the other hand, a precedent is being set so that the next Democrat president can lie about their spouses whereabouts or not tell the American public where they are or where their tax dollars are going. And they can point to the new Republican "tradition" Trump has started.

Nope. Only Repubs get to behave like this. Judicial Watch and Faux News will be all over any Democrat who pulls even a tenth of this crap.

Of what crap? There are zero facts to support any of the wild conspiracy theories being flung here.

It’s like a bunch of hypocritical old church ladies gossiping about a “loose woman.” It’s utterly ridiculous.

Michelle Obama’s mother lived in the White House off of taxpayer money for 8 years and nary a word was uttered.

It was their family situation and really not our business.

Taxpayer money pays for lots of things I oppose; if you don’t like it, run for office and change it.

Hi Melania!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So who is going to head up the Melania Trump investigatory committee?

The American public is going to love their tax dollars spent on attacking the FLOTUS after surgery.

It needs to be done, whether the public agrees with it or not. Remember, we elected a president whose job is to do what needs to be done, not give flowery eloquent speeches. The same principle applies here to ensure responsible use of public funds from American taxpayers.

This sentence is a dead give away that you are talking about Obama.

And, I think it’s hysterical that someone is thinking their needs to be an investigation of Melania’s whereabouts. Too funny!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So who is going to head up the Melania Trump investigatory committee?

The American public is going to love their tax dollars spent on attacking the FLOTUS after surgery.

It needs to be done, whether the public agrees with it or not. Remember, we elected a president whose job is to do what needs to be done, not give flowery eloquent speeches. The same principle applies here to ensure responsible use of public funds from American taxpayers.

This sentence is a dead give away that you are talking about Obama.

And, I think it’s hysterical that someone is thinking their needs to be an investigation of Melania’s whereabouts. Too funny!

You think it's funny that Melania could be trapped or in trouble and nobody knows? How cruel.

[Anonymous]

My vote is unexpectedly pregnant and on bedrest
Went to get the embolism, saw the youngun in there
High risk pregnancy precautions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My vote is unexpectedly pregnant and on bedrest
Went to get the embolism, saw the youngun in there
High risk pregnancy precautions

by whom?

I don't think so!


She is either having a mental/emotional issues (and who could blame her?) OR she is having a surgical issue that she doesn't want to talk about (be that cosmetic, such as re-doing the breasts, or something very personal like a hysterectomy.... she's right in the age zone for that. Having been there (for the latter), I can imagine that she wouldn't want everyone to know about her uterus if that is the case.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If she hadn’t been hospital it’s be odd. She could have health issues. That’s probably the reason why. And that’s nothing to do with anyone here. She has a reasonable right to privacy after a medical procedure.

People here are just bored/jealous/crazy.

She's a public employee. She has no right to privacy. She's married to the POTUS. She's FLOTUS, and she has a job to do.

I don't know why she disappeared from view for three weeks, but it's likely for a medical reason. Maybe POTUS hit her and she's got a big bruise she doesn't want to show in public? Maybe she had surgery, maybe something else, but it's very odd that she has not been seen in public for three weeks, and also very odd that the WH is making up stuff about her condition.

Kate Middleton showed up in public less than 24 hours after giving birth. Most of us looked like sh*t 24 hours after giving birth, yet Kate pulled it together and looked great.

If Melania were healthy, she'd be seen in public. Rumors fly when there is no information about a national figure.

Actually, no, she’s not. She does not draw a salary. She is not an employee. She is merely the wife of an employee. It’s protocol that covers what she’s expected to do and there’s nothing set in stone that explicitly requires her to do this or that.

THIS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dial 911. For you - not Melania. You seriously need help.

None of these questions are unreasonable. Why can’t you just answer?

Because in their hearts, they know something is amiss. They know that Trump has violated norms small and large and truly they don’t like it either, but if they admit this and examine it, they’re going to be uncorking a whole mess for themselves.

This. By a mile.

Now they're trying to obfuscate, throwing whatever shit they can in here to see what sticks.

Frankly the truth is this simple: IF the administration had Melania's cooperation right now, there'd be an official statement as to why she isn't seen--or she'd be seen. So either they are desperately trying to get her to play ball again, or she's in trouble of some kind.

Is it my business? In as much as it's personal life, no... Although the same trolls who went on about Michelle are sickening when they try and spin this one.

Am I concerned that her woman-beating husband is cracking jokes and she's missing? Yeah, actually I am. Maybe the administration is just too incompetent to come up with a good lie to hide whatever the true reason is--or maybe they're too stupid to understand that the truth would not shock anyone, or maybe they just really don't care about her enough to bother.

I'm not sure what kind of conservative finds any of those palatable, but let's face it: I'm probably more of a real conservative than you are, DCurbanmom troll. I