How likely for save act to pass senate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Except the SAVE Act is doing more than what this poll is asking.

19 states give illegal aliens drivers licenses, all refuse to turn over full voter rolls to the Trump Admin, DOJ has sued 17 of them -

1. California
2. Colorado
3. Connecticut
4. Delaware
5. Hawaii
6. Illinois
7. Maryland
8. Massachusetts
9. Minnesota
10. Nevada
11. New Jersey
12. New Mexico
13. New York
14. Oregon
15. Rhode Island
16. Utah
17.Vermont
18. Virginia
19. Washington State

You expect voters to believe Democrats concerns on Save act?

This is not proof of fraud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Except the SAVE Act is doing more than what this poll is asking.

19 states give illegal aliens drivers licenses, all refuse to turn over full voter rolls to the Trump Admin, DOJ has sued 17 of them -

1. California
2. Colorado
3. Connecticut
4. Delaware
5. Hawaii
6. Illinois
7. Maryland
8. Massachusetts
9. Minnesota
10. Nevada
11. New Jersey
12. New Mexico
13. New York
14. Oregon
15. Rhode Island
16. Utah
17.Vermont
18. Virginia
19. Washington State

You expect voters to believe Democrats concerns on Save act?

Trump needs to come into Virginia and slap down Spanberger and the atrocious legislation spewing like sewage from the governor’s mansion. The sewage spill into the Potomac is an apt analogy of what Democrats in Virginia are pushing.

You have to show legal presence to get a license in Virginia, unless something has changed in the last couple of years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Except the SAVE Act is doing more than what this poll is asking.

19 states give illegal aliens drivers licenses, all refuse to turn over full voter rolls to the Trump Admin, DOJ has sued 17 of them -

1. California
2. Colorado
3. Connecticut
4. Delaware
5. Hawaii
6. Illinois
7. Maryland
8. Massachusetts
9. Minnesota
10. Nevada
11. New Jersey
12. New Mexico
13. New York
14. Oregon
15. Rhode Island
16. Utah
17.Vermont
18. Virginia
19. Washington State

You expect voters to believe Democrats concerns on Save act?

Just because someone has a drivers license doesn't mean they are on the voter rolls. States are smart enough to be able to figure out how to grant a license without granting the right to vote. It is only MAGA who thinks everyone is as dumb as they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

Please show a poll that isn't totally partisan, that demonstrates popular support for the SAVE Act.

Here is the Gallup poll link, which is one of the most respected nonpartisan sources:
Gallup poll (October 2024)
Result: 83% support requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Direct link: https://news.gallup.com/poll/652523/americans-endorse-early-voting-voter-verification.aspx

View Gallup poll: Americans endorse proof of citizenship for voter registration
Key finding from Gallup:
“Providing proof of citizenship when registering to vote for the first time” is supported by 83% of U.S. adults.
Survey conducted Oct. 1–12, 2024 with 1,023 adults nationwide.

Why Gallup is considered especially credible
Founded in 1935, widely regarded as the gold standard in polling
Uses probability-based sampling
Transparent methodology and full question wording provided
Nonpartisan and academically respected

Except the SAVE Act is doing more than what this poll is asking.

19 states give illegal aliens drivers licenses, all refuse to turn over full voter rolls to the Trump Admin, DOJ has sued 17 of them -

1. California
2. Colorado
3. Connecticut
4. Delaware
5. Hawaii
6. Illinois
7. Maryland
8. Massachusetts
9. Minnesota
10. Nevada
11. New Jersey
12. New Mexico
13. New York
14. Oregon
15. Rhode Island
16. Utah
17.Vermont
18. Virginia
19. Washington State

You expect voters to believe Democrats concerns on Save act?

Just because someone has a drivers license doesn't mean they are on the voter rolls. States are smart enough to be able to figure out how to grant a license without granting the right to vote. It is only MAGA who thinks everyone is as dumb as they are.

There are databases that check these things you flarpin morons. Its also interesting to me that R pundits (AKA bootlickers) keep mentioning the affidavit carveout for people who dont have proof of citizenship.
The process for those without DPOC.
Section 2(f) of the SAVE Act creates a process for individuals without DPOC that is so unclear it
would likely be unworkable.
The SAVE Act requires the Election Assistance Commission (“EAC”) to provide guidance for
states to accept voter registrations from individuals who lack DPOC, but that the process shall
include an applicant (1) signing an attestation under penalty of perjury that they are a United States
citizen, and (2) submitting “such other evidence to the appropriate State official demonstrating that
the applicant is a citizen of the United States.” What this “other evidence” could be—evidence that
is not already included in the list of acceptable DPOC under Section 2(a)—is unclear.
Further, upon receiving the signed attestation and the additional, undefined proof of citizenship,
the SAVE Act would require election officials to make their own determination as to whether the
applicant may properly register to vote—and then sign an affidavit themselves explaining their
basis for allowing the applicant to register to vote

Its just hoops and circles meant to cause confusion. Its a poll tax. Its gymnastics. Its perfomance art. But mostly its BS.

If the government wants proof of citizenship then it needs to provide it free and easy to access and also the onus is on them to find all the documents- oh, and pay for them.

[Anonymous]

Who does the "Save America Act" disenfranchise?

-146 million without passport

-69 million married women who took spouse's last name

-21 million without ready access to citizenship docs

-21 million without current drivers license

-Rural voters forced to drive 4.5 hours to show docs at election office

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

You are not the first one to prefer absentee balloting which gave rise to the phrase of "ballot harvesting" - where the GOP go into nursing homes and "harvest" ballots. Not all of them make it to the ballot site to be counted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That it may not pass shows how out of touch democrats still are

You are in the deep minority on this when people understand what this bill actually does.

Voter ID is just common sense that falls well within the mainstream of public opinion, transcending party lines and demographics.

Polls consistently show overwhelming support: A recent CNN poll revealed that 85 percent of white Americans, 82 percent of Latinos, and 76 percent of black Americans favor requiring photo ID to vote.

And Democrat Elites continue to make up reasons to reject.

But that is a good one, so People are for the Save Act , but until they understand it like the Elites understand it , they will change their mind.

thank you for that morning chuckle.

I am not against voter ID; however, it is onerous to force people to go above and beyond to prove they are who they say they are. A Real ID should be sufficient to prove citizenship — if not, then the onus should be on the states to ensure everyone's Real ID shows this. A woman should not have to track down her marriage certificate(s) if she already has a Real ID.

The thing is, this is going to hurt the Red States more than the Republicans think it will. Older people are overwhelmingly Republican AND they vote — but putting the onus on 89 year old Matilda and 75 year old Gertrude to track down their marriage licenses and get a proper ID is going to limit their ability to vote in the end. All these old women will ultimately not vote because it’s going to be too difficult for them to manage it. Good luck, Republicans!

The thing is we can already tell you're angling for illegal votes when you start mentioning what party it is going to hurt more. It's high time to make our voting systems legitimate and not just in legislation, but in action. End the nonsense and excuses.

Bring it on! As I said, this will hurt Republicans more than anything - mark my words.

And while we’re at it, let’s get rid of mail-in voting so the military posted overseas cannot vote. Isn’t the military predominantly Republican;I can now that we got rid of “woke”?

Nice of you to be concerned about the military. I remember when Al Gore did not want them counted.

Gee. You do not understand the difference between absentee ballots and widespread mail in voting?

Absentee ballots used to be limited to those who required it and you had to meet standards to do it. I voted absentee when stationed on an overseas miltary post. It may have changed, but, at that time, I had to get a form from the JAG office and I think it had to be notarized there. It was not that hard, but there were checks on it.

Now, some states are sending out blanket mail in ballots. If you do not understand the fraud that can occur, you need to up your critical thinking skills.

And, yes, there is fraud. The most rampant is among mail in ballots. People are prosecuted for it, but, according to a federal prosecutor, it almost always requires someone to "turn" and report it.

It is pretty widely known that Chicago was stolen for Kennedy.

Find me the data that show mail-in ballots are fraught with fraud. Thanks!

It's self-evident. The data are clear about voting irregularities and lack of a chain of custody on any mail-in ballots. LBJ won his House election via fraud as well. It's been going on for a long time.

If you think Milwaukee residents have a higher voter turnout than suburban Wisconsinites, you're so naive that you should lose the franchise.

self evident =/= data

[Anonymous]

Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

Oops
*Poll tax

[Anonymous]

All those who thought getting married in the cute church in Italy . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

"In lieu of paying the poll tax, a prospective voter could apply for a certificate establishing a place of residence in Virginia. The application had to be made six months prior to an election, a measure expected to decrease the number of eligible voters.[1]

In the 1965 Supreme Court decision of Harman v. Forssenius, the Court unanimously found such measures unconstitutional and declared that, for federal elections, "the poll tax is abolished absolutely as a prerequisite to voting, and no equivalent or milder substitute may be imposed." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harman_v._Forssenius

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/380/528/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

Making it cost money for people to vote is a poll tax.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

it is if it is forcing people to spend money in order to vote.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ultimately, this needs to go to the Supreme Court as like it or not, it is a potential poll task.

It's not a poll tax, period.

If you are so confident, let the Supreme Court decide