You very clearly don’t understand how the constitution works, how gangs work, how prisons work, or even how compassion works. Why are you even opining in this matter? |
It does. But your insinuation that she admitted he is part of one them is a lie. |
I’m guessing it’s because dude is already dead or has been seriously injured. There’s no reason not to try to get him back. We do prisoner exchanges all the time. |
I guess we will wait for the Supremes. In the meantime, from the 4th Circuit's opinion upholding the injunction:
"“The Attorney General’s decision to remove Abrego Garcia to El Salvador was not one that was within her lawful discretion. The removal was not the enforcement of a valid order of removal. Instead, it was plainly in violation of immigration laws,” the court wrote." |
The answer is obvious. If they have to correct errors, they can’t just round up tons of people deport them, without regard to legal justification in the future, which is exactly what they plan to do. They have no plans for careful examination of potential deportees. |
Is this about gangs his backstory? Anyone here should read about the case, but here’s a rundown in a few sentences. His parents owned a business. Gangs were running an extortion scheme on parents. When they couldn’t pay, the gang wanted their sons in their gang. They threatened to harm the whole family. Parents sold their business and sent their sons across the border. So, yes, rival gangs can be a problem in this situation. |
+1 If they admit that this guy deserves due process, then so do all the others on the plane, and everyone else in the future [which, of course, they all do]. Either that or he is no longer retrievable aka deceased. But I hope it's the former, not the latter. |
He is not a prisoner |
DP. He's in a prison. I agree that "prison exchange" isn't the correct word choice, except that here, he is in a prison, so maybe it is. |
He’s being held in a prison. He’s a prisoner. Sorry you don’t like reality |
|
The Supreme Court has asked for a response to the government's appeal and has stayed the court order. Response is due tomorrow. Which should be pretty easy, just refile the same doc with changed headers. They can also add in some arguments addressing the novel arguments that the government has [attempted to] raise on appeal. If they are feeling generous. |
He may well be putting on a show, and I’m not convinced that this is the best and most efficient way of doing things, but the numbers at the border don’t lie. Like it or not, it’s working. |
That's why I objected to the use of 'ratio' vs the principle. |
What were the numbers before these infamous plane trips? This theater was not needed. It is only needed now to threaten all Americans with possible unreviewable exile. In "error". |