Censoring pro-palestine speech

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When calling for killing to stop (ie a ceasefire) is labelled antisemitism, it makes me think those people have no perspective.

When noting that Pro - Palestinians protests are calling for annihilation of Israel (as a PP above did) without noting that the land Israel sits on was once homes of Palestinians (Jews and Muslims and Christians), it makes me think those people are willfully blind to history.

When people discuss Jewish hate crimes without understanding that Palestinians and others from the Middle East are fearful for reporting anti Muslim hate crimes due to the way they were treated after 911, it makes me think they need to open their hearts to understanding.

This is a horrific situation for all.

Or maybe you're willfully blind to history? Palestine is the ancestral homeland of the Jews and archeological evidence supports it - not just the Old Testament that both Christians and Muslims base their faith on.


I am not willfully blind but perhaps there are gaps in my knowledge and I'd love to be educated - feel free to fill me in. From what I know, Judaism as a religion came first. And in ancient times Jewish people lived in the land that forms Israel today. But those same people who were Jewish, had children. And those children had children. At some point in history some of these children started following Jesus (maybe mostly forcibly converted during the Crusades). Other of these children became Muslim following Muhammad (am sure there was also force at work here at times too). And some kept with the older faith (remaining Jewish). Some left the region (likely often because of persecution and purges from the religion in power). Some stayed. But at the point in history when Zionism emerged (and energized by atrocities in Europe) those that stayed were mostly Muslim. It's not that the Palestinians came from another part of the world - they were the ones that stayed. Aren't these facts? If not, what am I missing or is not true?

My point above was that at times Christians, Muslims, and Jews coexisted in peace. See: https://www.972mag.com/before-zionism-the-shared-life-of-jews-and-palestinians/ . Isn't this ultimately the aim now? Is there a different outcome that you seek? Israel can kill most all of the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, but they can't kill all Muslims in the region so what is the end game if not peace?


This is very wrong.

Jewish identity started out as an ethnicity. We had a Kingdom of Judea and Israel. We tended to practice Judaism, but we were primarily an ethnic group.

We had a temple, which is where a mosque is now in Jerusalem.

The Romans came in and conquered those kingdoms, which led to many of us being expelled from the region. You know what happened to Jews in Europe, I assume.

However, some of us stayed. Muslims began populating the region as Islam became a religion.

We tried to go back many times, but were rebuffed by the Romans, then the Ottomans. Then it started getting easier when the British Mandatory Palestine.

Jewish emigration started more in earnest in the late 1800s and early 1900s. There were a bunch of Arab massacres of the Jews who tried to join our Mizrahi brothers and sisters in Mandatory Palestine. By 1945, 500,000 of us lived there and 1,000,000 Muslims did.

After WWII, Jews were stateless. We went to Mandatory Palestine to try to finally return to our homeland.

The UN proposed a partition plan that would have established Arab and Jewish states. The Jews accepted it, but the Arab League did not and declared war.

I could go on, but those are the basics.

As to your claim of children being Christian and Muslim: with some exceptions, no. Jews have been exceptionally insular.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I've had it with the exceptionalism that Israel hides behind. They are using this current situation to justify what they have always wanted to do...commit genocide and claim more land for themselves. It's shameful. For the last several decades Israel has counted on our collective shame about WWII to keep us all in line and supportive. And it's hard to see how Israel is really all that surprised by what happened on October 7. You can't oppress and occupy millions of people, holding them captive and dependent for generations, without hope, without self-determination, without freedom and think that at some people those hopeless, desperate people won't fight back. This is a situation of Israel's own making. But to point that out is anti-Semitism I suppose.


....."Her skirt was way too short."

(There is not one thing you can say to justify the brutal, evil attack on Oct. 7 by Hamas. There is no justification, no matter how hard you try.)


there is a lot of horrific, unjustifiable shit that happens in this world. But somehow because it's happened to Israel it's more important, more worthy of indignation.
Anonymous
It's possible to express support for the Palestinians if you truly mean it. I am guessing, though, that you are blaming Israel for the current Palestinian plight-- in my opinion, that is antisemitic. You are propagating Hamas' propaganda and you don't even know it. Hamas is dedicated to the destruction of Israel and the death of all the Jews in existence. They also don't care about the Palestinians-- they want to fulfill their charter with any means necessary-- including the sacrifice of innocent Palestinians. It's truly unfortunate that Hamas has brought this onto the Palestinians in Gaza. Hamas is entirely responsible for this onslaught and Hamas needs to end it. The blame for this conflicts lies entirely with Hamas. Hamas will not let people out of Gaza so that they can go to safety. Hamas has made it very difficult for Gazans to travel from the north to the south to avoid the areas that Israel told the Palestinians ahead of time that they would be targeting. If Hamas really cared about the Palestinians it rules, they would let them out the Rafa border and negotiate for a temporary refuge for them with Egypt. Hamas won't let Americans out of Gaza. This is Hamas' modis-operandi. To use Palestinians as martyrs-- they love their martyrs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:IDK, these pro-Palestine supporters don't seem to be censored at Tulane (a school with a very large Jewish student body):



The incident was off-campus and looled like it was in self defense. Why can't the pro-Israel counter protestors respect the space of the pro-Palestine protestors? If they had, this would never have happened.

Also, Tulane is a cr*p school that allowed a murderer to enroll in their law school a few years back. So it's no wonder their student body is anti-semitic.

Tulane also allowed my ex to enroll in their law school and he is a rapist, so yeah I guess I have a personal trigger around Tulane sometimes but that tweet is absolutely anti-semitic and jarring.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it seem like any statement or support for Palestine is now considered anti-semetic? It should be okay to say that I support the people of Israel after the horrific acts of terrorism but I do not support the corrupt ultra-right government of Israel. I detest Hamas but support the civilians of Palestine particularly all the innocent children trapped there. This past week a group of parents at my friends objected to the annual trick or treat for UNICEF because some of the proceeds would be used to help children in Palestine. This seems insane to me, it seems like any expression of support for Palestine is now considered unacceptable in the workplace, on social media, or at school. I find this completely out of line as a proponent of free speech. It seems like a dangerous slope that we are treading down.


You need better friends. Ignorance abounds.


I also don’t believe that happened.


UNICEF incident is in the local press now. https://www.lohud.com/story/news/education/2023/10/27/scarsdale-ny-school-district-unicef-fundraiser-canceled-amid-anti-semitism-concerns/71329094007/


So?


Wow. Giving aid to Palestinian children is antisemetic now.


I believe the problem is UN itself is an antisemitic body, for the most part. They just passed a resolution calling for a ceasefire and did not mention anything about Hamas' brutality in Israel, as an example. Also, much of the humanitarian aid that goes to Gaza is stolen by Hamas. Hamas has tons of fuel that it stole from humanitarian agencies and now won't let its people use the fuel, even as babies lay dying in hospitals. They are keeping it to continue with their genocide of the Jewish people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it seem like any statement or support for Palestine is now considered anti-semetic? It should be okay to say that I support the people of Israel after the horrific acts of terrorism but I do not support the corrupt ultra-right government of Israel. I detest Hamas but support the civilians of Palestine particularly all the innocent children trapped there. This past week a group of parents at my friends objected to the annual trick or treat for UNICEF because some of the proceeds would be used to help children in Palestine. This seems insane to me, it seems like any expression of support for Palestine is now considered unacceptable in the workplace, on social media, or at school. I find this completely out of line as a proponent of free speech. It seems like a dangerous slope that we are treading down.


Any money sent to help kids in Palestine will be taken by Hamas. There are enough intermediaries to give the UN deniability.


So what is your response? Send no aid to Gaza and let the children figure it out for themselves?


Hamas can give the children aid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would not be surprised if this thread had some of this going on.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/14/israel-students-social-media/2651715/


Also, who knows what sort of advanced automated chatbot type of tech countries have now to spread positive propaganda. I honestly have a hard time trusting the sources of where comments on here relating to this war come from.

STOP being paranoid. I'm one of the non-Jews who abhors civilian deaths but also thinks Israelis are being scapegoated here.

This kind of rhetoric - that there's an all-powerful Jewish cabal pulling the strings to mind-control people - is what the Nazis did to sow fear.

I'm not a damn chatbot.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why does it seem like any statement or support for Palestine is now considered anti-semetic? It should be okay to say that I support the people of Israel after the horrific acts of terrorism but I do not support the corrupt ultra-right government of Israel. I detest Hamas but support the civilians of Palestine particularly all the innocent children trapped there. This past week a group of parents at my friends objected to the annual trick or treat for UNICEF because some of the proceeds would be used to help children in Palestine. This seems insane to me, it seems like any expression of support for Palestine is now considered unacceptable in the workplace, on social media, or at school. I find this completely out of line as a proponent of free speech. It seems like a dangerous slope that we are treading down.


Any money sent to help kids in Palestine will be taken by Hamas. There are enough intermediaries to give the UN deniability.


So what is your response? Send no aid to Gaza and let the children figure it out for themselves?


Hamas can give the children aid.


Aid is going in. Stop it.
Anonymous
Jewish success has caused envy and that envy sometimes turns to hatred and to violence.

Anonymous
Palestinian failure leads to anger and violence.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I've had it with the exceptionalism that Israel hides behind. They are using this current situation to justify what they have always wanted to do...commit genocide and claim more land for themselves. It's shameful. For the last several decades Israel has counted on our collective shame about WWII to keep us all in line and supportive. And it's hard to see how Israel is really all that surprised by what happened on October 7. You can't oppress and occupy millions of people, holding them captive and dependent for generations, without hope, without self-determination, without freedom and think that at some people those hopeless, desperate people won't fight back. This is a situation of Israel's own making. But to point that out is anti-Semitism I suppose.


Yep it is anti Semitism
Also, you make Palestinians out to be uncontrolled savage people who can't help but be violent because their pride was hurt. Please let us know why this is endearing. If anyone described a people group I was in like this I would be so embarrassed and declare that this doesn't describe me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Palestinian failure leads to anger and violence.


Palestinians aren’t angry nor are they failures. They are the richest in the diaspora because they were one of the earliest Muslim /Arab immigrants to the Americas . They usually lead the pack
In the Arab community so much so that Arabs hate/envy Palestinians and call them the Jews of the Arabs . It’s meant as a half ironic/passive aggressive compliment/joke I suppose
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When calling for killing to stop (ie a ceasefire) is labelled antisemitism, it makes me think those people have no perspective.

When noting that Pro - Palestinians protests are calling for annihilation of Israel (as a PP above did) without noting that the land Israel sits on was once homes of Palestinians (Jews and Muslims and Christians), it makes me think those people are willfully blind to history.

When people discuss Jewish hate crimes without understanding that Palestinians and others from the Middle East are fearful for reporting anti Muslim hate crimes due to the way they were treated after 911, it makes me think they need to open their hearts to understanding.

This is a horrific situation for all.

Or maybe you're willfully blind to history? Palestine is the ancestral homeland of the Jews and archeological evidence supports it - not just the Old Testament that both Christians and Muslims base their faith on.


I am not willfully blind but perhaps there are gaps in my knowledge and I'd love to be educated - feel free to fill me in. From what I know, Judaism as a religion came first. And in ancient times Jewish people lived in the land that forms Israel today. But those same people who were Jewish, had children. And those children had children. At some point in history some of these children started following Jesus (maybe mostly forcibly converted during the Crusades). Other of these children became Muslim following Muhammad (am sure there was also force at work here at times too). And some kept with the older faith (remaining Jewish). Some left the region (likely often because of persecution and purges from the religion in power). Some stayed. But at the point in history when Zionism emerged (and energized by atrocities in Europe) those that stayed were mostly Muslim. It's not that the Palestinians came from another part of the world - they were the ones that stayed. Aren't these facts? If not, what am I missing or is not true?

My point above was that at times Christians, Muslims, and Jews coexisted in peace. See: https://www.972mag.com/before-zionism-the-shared-life-of-jews-and-palestinians/ . Isn't this ultimately the aim now? Is there a different outcome that you seek? Israel can kill most all of the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, but they can't kill all Muslims in the region so what is the end game if not peace?


This is very wrong.

Jewish identity started out as an ethnicity. We had a Kingdom of Judea and Israel. We tended to practice Judaism, but we were primarily an ethnic group.

We had a temple, which is where a mosque is now in Jerusalem.

The Romans came in and conquered those kingdoms, which led to many of us being expelled from the region. You know what happened to Jews in Europe, I assume.

However, some of us stayed. Muslims began populating the region as Islam became a religion.

We tried to go back many times, but were rebuffed by the Romans, then the Ottomans. Then it started getting easier when the British Mandatory Palestine.

Jewish emigration started more in earnest in the late 1800s and early 1900s. There were a bunch of Arab massacres of the Jews who tried to join our Mizrahi brothers and sisters in Mandatory Palestine. By 1945, 500,000 of us lived there and 1,000,000 Muslims did.

After WWII, Jews were stateless. We went to Mandatory Palestine to try to finally return to our homeland.

The UN proposed a partition plan that would have established Arab and Jewish states. The Jews accepted it, but the Arab League did not and declared war.

I could go on, but those are the basics.

As to your claim of children being Christian and Muslim: with some exceptions, no. Jews have been exceptionally insular.


So where did all the Muslims that "began populating the region" come from? This genetic study (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/) states that "Archaeologic and genetic data support that both Jews and Palestinians came from the ancient Canaanites". And Biblically, doesn't Judaism and Islam share a common ancestor in Abraham?

& how are you so certain that "Jews have been exceptionally insular"? My Dad's family is Jewish Ukrainian and he was non-observant, married a lapsed Catholic, raised an atheistic who is married to a Hindu. Sure, it's impressive that many Jewish families stayed true to their belief system (ethnicity as you mention?) through endless horrors and prosecution, but that doesn't mean that all Jews managed to do that.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Jewish success has caused envy and that envy sometimes turns to hatred and to violence.



You mean Jewish existence. Saying "success" feeds into tropes. I am sure there are plenty of Jewish people who have had non successful lives, you know why, because they are people like everyone one else. Everyone has that brother or cousin or aunt who just quite can't get with it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If there is more privileged group on college campuses than “pro”-Palestinian protesters, it’s tough to say what that group would be.

Yep. The transgender and nonbinary crowd that hates women is the only more privileged "protester" group.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: