Whistleblower accuses Biden of criminal conduct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:'If true', the banana republic theory is alive and well in DC

Lacking evidence as always.

[Anonymous]

Not sure where we are at with this... did they find their missing whistleblower? Any ideas why someone who was supposedly an IRS insider would be "in court" or "in jail" or missing?

https://www.mediaite.com/news/marjorie-taylor-greene-claims-gop-whistleblowers-are-missing-but-still-in-contact-with-informant-who-will-bring-down-the-president/

And anyone else thinks someone's trying to play the GOP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:'If true', the banana republic theory is alive and well in DC

Lacking evidence as always.

That’s why I said it is incorrect to call the person a whistleblower. A whistleblower is someone with insider proof of fraud or malfeasance, not someone making allegations based on hearsay with no evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure where we are at with this... did they find their missing whistleblower? Any ideas why someone who was supposedly an IRS insider would be "in court" or "in jail" or missing?

https://www.mediaite.com/news/marjorie-taylor-greene-claims-gop-whistleblowers-are-missing-but-still-in-contact-with-informant-who-will-bring-down-the-president/

And anyone else thinks someone's trying to play the GOP?

I think they are playing themselves for right wing news cycle points. "Missing" sure, Jan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Not sure where we are at with this... did they find their missing whistleblower? Any ideas why someone who was supposedly an IRS insider would be "in court" or "in jail" or missing?

https://www.mediaite.com/news/marjorie-taylor-greene-claims-gop-whistleblowers-are-missing-but-still-in-contact-with-informant-who-will-bring-down-the-president/

And anyone else thinks someone's trying to play the GOP?

The whistleblower is not missing. Not at all.
The informant is the one that is missing. This piece seems to confuse the two. Two different people.

[Anonymous]

The informant is Gal Luft, an Israeli 'professor' who is wanted by the US government for "arms trafficking.' He went missing in March

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/israeli-professor-wanted-in-the-us-for-weapons-trafficking-goes-missing-in-cyprus/

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile back on planet earth, the FBI whistleblower(s) in front of Congress today were told by DC releasing footage from J6 may compromise CHS... hmmm

[Anonymous]

Merrill Garland running major interference for the Biden’s.

Garland will cash in big time for his loyalty.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Merrill Garland running major interference for the Biden’s.

Garland will cash in big time for his loyalty.

If FBI agent Steve Friend lied today under oath, can't wait for the Democrats to make a criminal referral to Garlands DOJ

[Anonymous]

The receipt

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The receipt

Informants are not undercover officers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile back on planet earth, the FBI whistleblower(s) in front of Congress today were told by DC releasing footage from J6 may compromise CHS... hmmm

Oh look, these "whistleblowers" are actually right wing nut jobs who were trying to run interference for January 6 defendants: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/17/fbi-agents-testify-security-clearances/

[Anonymous]

Thus illustrating how the "flood the zone with sh!t" tactic promulgated by Steve Bannon comes to life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Merrill Garland running major interference for the Biden’s.

Garland will cash in big time for his loyalty.

If FBI agent Steve Friend lied today under oath, can't wait for the Democrats to make a criminal referral to Garlands DOJ

Interesting post. You do realize that the video of the conversation was actually played at the hearing?

So instead of rooting for the prosecution of a whistleblower why don’t you do some research?