Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her LinkedIn page shows that all of her jobs in the past 5 years or so only lasted for a few months. Like a series of 3-4 month stints. Wonder if there were red flags at work, too.

I don’t know this woman at all but I used to work in disability law and that is very common for people with schizophrenia or bipolar. They can present very well initially at a job interview but inevitably end up causing weird conflicts with coworkers or clients that usually leads to a termination pretty quickly, or they just quit because they feel aggrieved about something that typically would not have been a big deal with with someone who did not have a mental illness.

The extreme promiscuity in college also suggests former sexual abuse to me. Most college women aren’t running a trademarked BJ factory. I think this all looks very different from the G Maxwell situation which was the more traditional woman pimping girls for money/power scenario.

I’m not trying to excuse any of this—she should go to jail pretty much forever and ever have access to children again.

All of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board.

Yeah - “all of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board”. You must be a real Pollyanna! This women has been convicted of engaging in sex acts in a park and now hard evidence has been presented to another court alleging serious misconduct against kids. She is clearly oversexed and to completely dismiss what you highlighted is beyond naive.

Are you with the so-called PR firm that is paid to spew BS?

No, I am saying that I’m skeptical of people who claim to know all these salacious details about her.

Who knows if these people are telling the truth or not, but these salacious allegations from college are actually the most wholesome thing that’s been said about her in the thread. What we do know from the charging documents is so much worse that the rest doesn’t even matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her LinkedIn page shows that all of her jobs in the past 5 years or so only lasted for a few months. Like a series of 3-4 month stints. Wonder if there were red flags at work, too.

I don’t know this woman at all but I used to work in disability law and that is very common for people with schizophrenia or bipolar. They can present very well initially at a job interview but inevitably end up causing weird conflicts with coworkers or clients that usually leads to a termination pretty quickly, or they just quit because they feel aggrieved about something that typically would not have been a big deal with with someone who did not have a mental illness.

The extreme promiscuity in college also suggests former sexual abuse to me. Most college women aren’t running a trademarked BJ factory. I think this all looks very different from the G Maxwell situation which was the more traditional woman pimping girls for money/power scenario.

I’m not trying to excuse any of this—she should go to jail pretty much forever and ever have access to children again.

All of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board.

Yeah - “all of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board”. You must be a real Pollyanna! This women has been convicted of engaging in sex acts in a park and now hard evidence has been presented to another court alleging serious misconduct against kids. She is clearly oversexed and to completely dismiss what you highlighted is beyond naive.

Are you with the so-called PR firm that is paid to spew BS?

No, I am saying that I’m skeptical of people who claim to know all these salacious details about her.

Who knows if these people are telling the truth or not, but these salacious allegations from college are actually the most wholesome thing that’s been said about her in the thread. What we do know from the charging documents is so much worse that the rest doesn’t even matter.

That’s fine, my point is that you shouldn’t believe everything some rando writes on the internet. Someone upthread was making all sorts of assumptions based on these alleged behaviors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her LinkedIn page shows that all of her jobs in the past 5 years or so only lasted for a few months. Like a series of 3-4 month stints. Wonder if there were red flags at work, too.

I don’t know this woman at all but I used to work in disability law and that is very common for people with schizophrenia or bipolar. They can present very well initially at a job interview but inevitably end up causing weird conflicts with coworkers or clients that usually leads to a termination pretty quickly, or they just quit because they feel aggrieved about something that typically would not have been a big deal with with someone who did not have a mental illness.

The extreme promiscuity in college also suggests former sexual abuse to me. Most college women aren’t running a trademarked BJ factory. I think this all looks very different from the G Maxwell situation which was the more traditional woman pimping girls for money/power scenario.

I’m not trying to excuse any of this—she should go to jail pretty much forever and ever have access to children again.

All of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board.

There are definitely posters on here that know them. The story re stolen prescription pad is true.

Yeah - “all of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board”. You must be a real Pollyanna! This women has been convicted of engaging in sex acts in a park and now hard evidence has been presented to another court alleging serious misconduct against kids. She is clearly oversexed and to completely dismiss what you highlighted is beyond naive.

Are you with the so-called PR firm that is paid to spew BS?

No, I am saying that I’m skeptical of people who claim to know all these salacious details about her.

Who knows if these people are telling the truth or not, but these salacious allegations from college are actually the most wholesome thing that’s been said about her in the thread. What we do know from the charging documents is so much worse that the rest doesn’t even matter.

That’s fine, my point is that you shouldn’t believe everything some rando writes on the internet. Someone upthread was making all sorts of assumptions based on these alleged behaviors.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a friend of the family, I must say that Eleanor’s parents and brother have long known about her mental instabilities and they have made strides to limit the damage Eleanor could cause towards others. For the last several years, they have been very vocal in assisting the exH gain custody of the kids and have tried to get her counseling and medical supervision.

After many, many years of hardship, Eleanor’s support group was limited in what they could do to stop her and incidents like the public sex affair proved that no one had the power to prohibit her actions. Unfortunately, I do not think anyone knew the extent of how far Eleanor gone or had any idea of CSA - thus the family was unable to garner additional support. Eleanor Hoppe is the epitome of how an adult with serious mental issues can inflict untold pain on our society and that her type of situation can only be properly dealt with after it is too late.

You are in denial. In the area I live in a very wealthy prominent socialite got charged with a corruption scheme. First her friends like you were loud in defending her, once it became obvious it was a real crime all these voices became quiet quickly. Be it or not this family is going to be a pariah for harboring a pedophile daughter and knows what else dirty family laundry, and you have to wrap your brain around that. Better for you not to be associated with this mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I took a look at the charging document and there's so much disgusting about it. Starting with the fact that guys like the one the undercover agent was pretending to be do exist. And also her story that she was trying to sting him. ugh ugh ugh. Her communications are just so sick. Good thing she didn't try harder to cover her tracks.

The UC was a creep for asking for naked photos of her.

He didn't. Show me, or site the article where it says he asked for photos.

Doesn't say the UC officer asked her for photos: "According to the prosecution, Eleanor Hoppe allegedly sent a topless photograph of herself to the undercover officer to prove she was “safe” and then sent a video of .."

[Anonymous]

It says the UC asked for the photos in the affidavit in support of her arrest. I think that many law enforcement agencies have rules against officers sending nude pics. Thus, it is not unusual to ask someone to make sure he/she isn't a LEO. The UC--a female--asked for the pic to make sure she was "safe". She complied.

[Anonymous]

I'm still in shock that the Richmond Times-Dispatch is willing to be paid off not to run stories on this. So much for free press. Having grown up in Richmond, I used to think it was a real paper (for a midsized city at least.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a friend of the family, I must say that Eleanor’s parents and brother have long known about her mental instabilities and they have made strides to limit the damage Eleanor could cause towards others. For the last several years, they have been very vocal in assisting the exH gain custody of the kids and have tried to get her counseling and medical supervision.

After many, many years of hardship, Eleanor’s support group was limited in what they could do to stop her and incidents like the public sex affair proved that no one had the power to prohibit her actions. Unfortunately, I do not think anyone knew the extent of how far Eleanor gone or had any idea of CSA - thus the family was unable to garner additional support. Eleanor Hoppe is the epitome of how an adult with serious mental issues can inflict untold pain on our society and that her type of situation can only be properly dealt with after it is too late.

Well according to other people in this thread who also claim to know that family, Eleanor's parents are rude snobs.

Wondering how much anyone can help a family member if they themselves lack decency.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a friend of the family, I must say that Eleanor’s parents and brother have long known about her mental instabilities and they have made strides to limit the damage Eleanor could cause towards others. For the last several years, they have been very vocal in assisting the exH gain custody of the kids and have tried to get her counseling and medical supervision.

After many, many years of hardship, Eleanor’s support group was limited in what they could do to stop her and incidents like the public sex affair proved that no one had the power to prohibit her actions. Unfortunately, I do not think anyone knew the extent of how far Eleanor gone or had any idea of CSA - thus the family was unable to garner additional support. Eleanor Hoppe is the epitome of how an adult with serious mental issues can inflict untold pain on our society and that her type of situation can only be properly dealt with after it is too late.

This is either a troll or some PR BS. But if you want to go there about what her parents and brother have done and not done over the years we can go there. We can start with the stealing of a prescription pad and writing narco prescriptions, and several allegations of assault (that were true). Mr. Hunton took care of those and magically made them go away, but we remember and so do a lot of people. Just like he helped Eleanor get that 2019 Chesterfield charge thrown out. And just like they all looked the other way while she volunteered at several places involving children, including their school.

They didn't help Joel. GMAFB. There are so many people with so many stories.

+1 PR BS. Sounds like she had a life time of skirting consequences due to daddy and mommy. Now the chickens have come to roost they are scared for their reputation? Hope they get kicked out of their country clubs.

Never heard about assault allegations by the brother - could you elaborate??? The narco prescription pads is definitely true

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It says the UC asked for the photos in the affidavit in support of her arrest. I think that many law enforcement agencies have rules against officers sending nude pics. Thus, it is not unusual to ask someone to make sure he/she isn't a LEO. The UC--a female--asked for the pic to make sure she was "safe". She complied.

Yes, the affidavit says the female FBI agent asked her for a topless photo in which she was making a certain sign by the breast — that photo was then used to confirm that the person chatting was the woman they arrested. (Requesting a certain sign avoided any issue with the chatter just downloading a random p it the from the internet.).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not cool to doxx the school of young kids traumatized by their mother being arrested for child porn, if not more and post it on the interwebs.

Have some decency, unlike their mom.

Absolutely THIS!! Leave her poor kids out of this entirely.

Those poor kids lives have already been irreparably damaged by the actions of their criminally evil mom.

I wish them only peace and recovery.

I know what school the girls go to but I haven’t seen it written anywhere on this thread. So I’m not sure to what you are referring. If you mean St. Catherine’s, that’s where the mother went to school in Richmond as a child. Not the same.

Well, she spent almost 1/3 her life at St. Catherine's, so it formed her somehow. The 64,000 dollar question is whether or not Kristen Rossum (the Rose Petal Murderer) was in her class.

[Anonymous]

So what’s the deal with St. Catherine's?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her LinkedIn page shows that all of her jobs in the past 5 years or so only lasted for a few months. Like a series of 3-4 month stints. Wonder if there were red flags at work, too.

I don’t know this woman at all but I used to work in disability law and that is very common for people with schizophrenia or bipolar. They can present very well initially at a job interview but inevitably end up causing weird conflicts with coworkers or clients that usually leads to a termination pretty quickly, or they just quit because they feel aggrieved about something that typically would not have been a big deal with with someone who did not have a mental illness.

The extreme promiscuity in college also suggests former sexual abuse to me. Most college women aren’t running a trademarked BJ factory. I think this all looks very different from the G Maxwell situation which was the more traditional woman pimping girls for money/power scenario.

I’m not trying to excuse any of this—she should go to jail pretty much forever and ever have access to children again.

All of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board.

Yeah - “all of this is just hearsay on an anonymous message board”. You must be a real Pollyanna! This women has been convicted of engaging in sex acts in a park and now hard evidence has been presented to another court alleging serious misconduct against kids. She is clearly oversexed and to completely dismiss what you highlighted is beyond naive.

Are you with the so-called PR firm that is paid to spew BS?

No, I am saying that I’m skeptical of people who claim to know all these salacious details about her.

Who knows if these people are telling the truth or not, but these salacious allegations from college are actually the most wholesome thing that’s been said about her in the thread. What we do know from the charging documents is so much worse that the rest doesn’t even matter.

Agree.

And given the public sex arrest and the child p$rn arrest, it seems unlikely she was a nun in college.

So the family spin is they heroically tried to contain her and her mental illness should mitigate the consequences for her?

Not buying it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So what’s the deal with St. Catherine's?

Old money, all-girls, Episcopalian school in Richmond. Brother school is St. Christophers.

Very insular community. Many families that attend these schools belong to the Country Club of Virginia (CCV).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not cool to doxx the school of young kids traumatized by their mother being arrested for child porn, if not more and post it on the interwebs.

Have some decency, unlike their mom.

Absolutely THIS!! Leave her poor kids out of this entirely.

Those poor kids lives have already been irreparably damaged by the actions of their criminally evil mom.

I wish them only peace and recovery.

I know what school the girls go to but I haven’t seen it written anywhere on this thread. So I’m not sure to what you are referring. If you mean St. Catherine’s, that’s where the mother went to school in Richmond as a child. Not the same.

Well, she spent almost 1/3 her life at St. Catherine's, so it formed her somehow. The 64,000 dollar question is whether or not Kristen Rossum (the Rose Petal Murderer) was in her class.

This was addressed a few pages back in this thread.