Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm just not seeing a huge difference between privates and between privates and the wealthiest/magnet/application publics.
If you see the difference, can you please explain it to me?
The difference is pretty huge when you adjust for the class sizes. Whitman has 450+ students per class and most top privates have 80-120. So take whatever measure you want and see whether Whitman or other similarly sized wealthy public’s are doing 4x better. Not even close.
Yeah…that is really weak analysis. Considering privates are curating their class vs taking the first 120 that walk in the door you can’t say Whitman should somehow have 4X the admits. Even comparing the top 120 at Whitman vs a private isn’t exactly fair, but at least somewhat comparable.
Lmao what?? There’s no test by which private schools could prove their value to you, clearly.
Not lmao. Np here.
Pp you don’t seem to understand that the point is a child who would get into a selective private school will fair just as well at a Whitman-like public as they will be in the top part of the class and the College acceptances for the top part of the class of any dmv hs is similar to overall selective private outcomes. This is obvious now.
It’s actually not. But you’ll then claim that the reason privates do better is because of the greater amount of hooked kids.
A more apt comparison is between say Sidwell and TJ...where both are able to curate their classes.
So, let's look at the stats from Polarislist that look at admits from those two schools to Harvard, Princeton and MIT from 2018-2020.
Sidwell...120 kids in typical graduating class...sent 9 kids to those schools
TJ...450 kids in typical graduating class (so factor of 3.75x)...sent 57
So, TJ sent 6.33x more kids to those schools compared to Sidwell, yet class size is only 3.75x bigger
What other weak, lazy analysis will you come back with now?