Atheism’s sexual misconduct problem
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
This is groundbreaking and proves your point about atheisms sexual misconduct problem. Incredible work. Simply incredible. You are truly playing 4d chess. You quoted something for someone who doesn’t control anyone, and they said a things and now all atheists are pedophiles and you win the thread. |
Anonymous
I was referring to people who’ve bought/read his book - his followers. On DCUM his followers are all believers from what people have posted. |
Anonymous
^^ To clarify, I haven’t heard of any atheists here who are his followers. Just a few religious believers. |
Anonymous
I’ve already denounced him multiple times. I’m hoping to hear from his followers - the people on here who have actually read/bought his book. How has reading his book affected their view of pedophilia? |
Anonymous
You keep avoiding the problem. Your careful wording or “doesn’t control anything” is obviously designed to sidestep the fact that he has at least 3.3 million readers and more listeners. And you STILL haven’t condemned the quote. Disgusting. |
Anonymous
Christians bought his book, too. Are they pedophiles? |
Anonymous
Nice. You keep trying to find ridiculous ways to claim that none of Dawkins’ 3.3 million readers is influenced by what he writes. Because…there are no atheist readers on DCUM…or, mumble, mumble…something. |
Anonymous
Are all 1.3 million listeners aware that he said something pedophilia adjacent supporting? Does that one quote make him a legitimate pedophile. I mean has he been arrested for pedophilia? You really are on shaky ground with any of your assertions, so I’m just responding to you because it’s funny to converse with the poorly reasoned. It’s so exhilarating. Your so convinced you’ve proven anything, when really there has been no crime committed, no kids molested (like the ones with you church folks) and basically you don’t have anything profound to write about. It’s fluff. It’s air. And my man I am here to banter with you, no matter how serious you get. It’s like playing fetch with a tenacious little chihuahua. |
Anonymous
Sure dude. Can you provide any proof that any molestations have taken place by atheists? We all knooooow that the old church has quite a record, but you talk about rampant sexual abuse, but you provide no cases for us to examine. Keep it up, we can all wait. |
Anonymous
Stop these lame derailing attempts already. Who the hell cares of Dawkins himself diddles little boys. Well, that would be bad, but it’s not the point. You keep trying to avoid the point. Dawkins has a huge audience and he’s said repeatedly (Google interviews) that pedophilia is OK. You trying various ways to pretend he has no influence is pathetic. |
Anonymous
Good idea. The Catholic bishops have a database of pedo priests. Atheist orgs have nothing similar. Looks like atheists are afraid to take responsibility for themselves. |
Anonymous
(trigger warning) I find it hard to imagine that somebody would rape a child based on what Dawkins said. According to an article from the Atlantic: Referring to his early days at a boarding school in Salisbury, he recalled how one of the (unnamed) masters “pulled me on his knee and put his hand inside my shorts.” “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today,” he said. He said the most notorious cases of pedophilia involve rape and even murder and should not be bracketed with what he called “just mild touching up.” It's completely sickening and innacurate but influential? To the extent that somebody would rape a child? I dunno I find that hard to believe. |
Anonymous
|
Don't think there is an atheist molestation problem, OP. There's no organization that atheists show up to in order to coordinate anything as suggested. . There's no doctrine or creed, or sociology, that's the point. This is really ridiculous. There are atheists who might also be molesters. Just like some molesters have brown hair. But there isn't a problem of people with brown hair being sex offenders. Do you understand fallacy when arguing?
This argument does not fly, OP. You can't reverse logic here in light of other systems that have issues with sexual offenses as a part of the system. Just stop. |
Anonymous
Dawkins gives permission to people who were already thinking about molesting a child. |
Anonymous
OP, serious question. Do you smoke crack? |