Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
DCPS did not fire Peter Cahall “because he couldn’t close the achievement gap.” They just *said* that’s why. |
Why was he fired? |
Exactly. That's why I put it in quotations. JR hasn't been a gay friendly environment institutionally for a long while. |
I agree with most of what you said, but for anyone who speaks current DC English, the teacher definitely DID NOT repeat back what the student said. You can claim to not understand that, but frankly I don’t believe you. This is not complicated. |
| It’s kind of scary that they’d fire a principal who was doing a basically good job … |
Yep. It is a little Orwellian too...the reasons they give for and not for firing. As far as I can tell her was the last real 'leader' that Wilson had, too. We sought him out once when some Wilson students were smoking and spitting on our back stoop which was pretty irritating. He immediately knew who they were based on a few distinguishing characteristics and sought them out and spoke with them. Which is exactly what kids this age need--someone who bothers. |
Same thing happened at Walls. Central office does not like principals who are independent thinkers |
They definitely do not. |
What in the holy hell are you talking about? Learn to read, genius. No one said the teacher broke down. What they said was that the the abuse sufferer by the teacher was likely being internalized by gay kids in the class and that they (the kids) might act out. I try to be nice, but sometimes DCUM makes it so damn hard. |
| Any updates? Are the teacher and student back in class, business as usual? Feel so bad for the teacher—really an impossible situation. |
...who here is adamant that the kids not be suspended or face consequences? |
I have posted that I am against “in home” suspension. Kids who are in trouble and cannot behave should have in school suspension where they work with a therapist. A lot of the issues teen have is with impulse control and perspective taking. |
Do non black children get expelled for saying the n**ger? |
Ha. You're both definitely not Black, that's for sure. |
Couple of things: 1. No sh*t Sherlock! You figured that out all by yourself? 2. Point here is not that the kid saying a racial slur should not be suspended; I believe he should be. The point is that the SJW and woke-warriors are all against suspensions and real consequences in this situation but change the fact pattern a bit and their wokeness meter gets melted down because it isn't clear from the SJW Handbook whether they should hate racism or suspensions more. |