Kavanaugh vote postponed. Judiciary Committee hearing on Sexual Assault complain Monday.

[Anonymous]

^^YOU seem to know^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to hear all the Democrats who have publicly and proudly stated that they believe her explain why they don’t believe 4 of her classmates.
Why believe one woman and not another? Whitehouse... Blumenthal... Gilibrand... all of them.

I believe that they don't remember the party (Maybe even Judge, who could have been blacked out)- which is all they state --for them, there is not assault to remember. Only Ford was assaulted and it sticks out in her mind.

This.

But she has said one her lifelong friends was at the party--one of two girls at a party of five. Ford says she locked herself in the bathroom and then disappeared from the party. Her good girlfriend didn't notice and never inquired after her--even though Ford somehow had to travel 12 miles to her house when she was below driving age?

Lie:

She has not stated the exact location of the party or the date publicly. Unless you are privy to some private information (and you have NO sources for your statement). Don't spread obvious lies and suppositions on this thread.

She said the house was near the Columbia Country Club. Her home in Potomac is 12 miles from the Club.

Seriously? That's your big reveal? She got a ride home. Are you expected to remember who you got a ride from a party where you were raped? The other possibility here is that the person who gave her the ride home was Kavanaugh himself. That would seem problematic to some, but it actually fits the behavior of an attempted rape exactly.

I was raped by the nephew of a prominent Democrat Senator in the 1980's. I was a law student at the time at a top law school in DC and had worked for the Senator in the past. I had only known him vaguely and had seen him at the social gatherings. I was had been drinking, but not enough to not be aware of what was happening. He led me into a bedroom under the pretense of wanting to have a more private conversation. He began kissing me hard and then I was held down by this person as he tried to wrench my underwear to the side to rape me. It was as though another personality had taken over this person and he became a guided missile and I was his target. The only thing that stopped him was the sudden entry of another party goer trying to get into the adjacent bathroom. I squirmed away and returned to the party where only a few people who I didn't know remained. I had no other way to get back to my house other than getting a ride on icy dark roads in Virginia back to my house in DC. This person had previously been normal and even jovial with me before the incident. I had no money and really had no choice than to get a ride from him. I couldn't call anyone to get me in this situation at 3:00AM. So I was driven home by my attacker. He seemed vaguely watchful but back to his old self as he offered to drive me home--because I had no choice but to accept his offer. He took me home without incident. This was 1986. I have never reported this to police and told no one this except my husband whom I married 10 years after the incident.

PLEASE. Don’t make up stuff.

You are a pig to even suggest that this is made up. But people like you are why it wasn't reported.

Actually, you twit, Ford was NOT RAPED. That was indeed made up by the PP in bold. Perhaps you and others should stop accusing Kavanaugh of raping anyone.
-DP

I should have said that Ford was an attempted rape. That changes nothing. You should read the rest of my account of my experience--it was an attempted rape that is described--but carry on calling me names--it's probably what you do best.

Which, her attorneys are now referring to as “sexual misconduct.” An interesting change in terminology on their part.

Sexual misconduct can be anything from unwanted touching to forceable rape. Why are you trying to minimize or rationalize away my account? You are really proving the point of why women don't report these things. I was a grown women and felt cowed by the power structure at the time. Here you are now berating me about terminology and taunting me. Wow.

Perhaps you're unaware, but the PP you're "talking" to and the PP who called you (accurately) a twit, are not the same PP. There are many of us here. And no one is interested in your personal account, which you keep urging people to read.

Exactly

[Anonymous]

I'm not reading all 260 pages of this, but as someone who was a senior in high school (at B-CC) the same year as Kavanaugh, the stories do not sound at all out of the realm for someone who was a prototypical "frat boy" of the time. And the MoCo high school parties in the early 80s, and what went on at colleges in the mid-80s, was a whole lot of what these women are now revealing. I had the slighest of passing acquaintance with Kavanaugh, and while I know nothing about whether he did any of those things, he certainly strikes me as someone who would have run with a frat boy group. He certainly wasn't home playing Mock Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Avanetti's letter to the Senate Committee is :wow:

I know it’s supposed to be the third nuclear bomb, and I concede that Judge K is probably done, but remember, salacious as it is, it contains allegations, not proof.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

[Anonymous]

I will say this, though: if there is to be a prosecutorial day of reckoning for white college males the 1980s, every third family will be impacted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It took her six days to figure out her memory of this? She attended social events with him (wedding) and had smiling pictures taken with him? Give me a break.

This often happens with sexual assault. The guy acts like nothing happened the next time you see him. You are in the same social circle so you try to get over it and go along with the social power structure. Yes, you will still socialize with him (in groups only probably) but you never forget his violation of your body and you live in silent fear that he will try it again. This is a very common scenario.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I will say this, though: if there is to be a prosecutorial day of reckoning for white college males the 1980s, every third family will be impacted.

He's not on trial. He's just interviewing for a promotion. It's not an inalienable right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Avanetti's letter to the Senate Committee is :wow:

I know it’s supposed to be the third nuclear bomb, and I concede that Judge K is probably done, but remember, salacious as it is, it contains allegations, not proof.

True.

But so far Avenatti, while a showboat (and a terrible wannabe presidential candidate - no, dude. Just stop) has so far not been mistaken. He was right about Stormy and Donald. He delivered Michael Cohen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Kavanaugh think it was okay to put his two daughters into this, knowing fully well what a scum he has been. While I care about his wife, she might have known and being an adult she can handle. But the daughters, what would they go through when all this plays on media.

What the heck, in addition to being a pervert is is also narcissistic!

I hope Mrs Kavanaugh leaves him, DC, and changes her name and theirs. Those poor little girls.

I do not think that would help. The girls are big enough to access online news on their own. They cannot escape the truth about their father. I hate Trump and Kavanaugh, yet feel sad for the daughters. How can Kavanaugh be so selfish?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

Screen shot from Avenatti twitter account. Avenatti posted his list of questions for Grassley's Senate Judiciary nominating committee head detailing a list of questions that they would like to know about alleged gang rape that involved presumably Judge and Kavanaugh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

It appears to be related to this towards the end of the Farrow article:

After seeing Judge’s denial, Elizabeth Rasor, who met Judge at Catholic University and was in a relationship with him for about three years, said that she felt morally obligated to challenge his account that “ ‘no horseplay’ took place at Georgetown Prep with women.” Rasor stressed that “under normal circumstances, I wouldn’t reveal information that was told in confidence,” but, she said, “I can’t stand by and watch him lie.” In an interview with The New Yorker, she said, “Mark told me a very different story.” Rasor recalled that Judge had told her ashamedly of an incident that involved him and other boys taking turns having sex with a drunk woman. Rasor said that Judge seemed to regard it as fully consensual. She said that Judge did not name others involved in the incident, and she has no knowledge that Kavanaugh participated. But Rasor was disturbed by the story and noted that it undercut Judge’s protestations about the sexual innocence of Georgetown Prep. (Barbara Van Gelder, an attorney for Judge, said that he “categorically denies” the account related by Rasor. Van Gelder said that Judge had no further comment.)

[Anonymous]

I’ve got calendars! Wait...not the pin up ones....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Did Avenatti post this?

Ok can someone tell me what the hell this post is about?

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1044032678951960576

He says he has evidence concerning Kavanaugh & Judge at multiple parties in D.C. in the early 80s where drunk/drugged women were targeted by men to run a "train" on them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Avanetti's letter to the Senate Committee is :wow:

I know it’s supposed to be the third nuclear bomb, and I concede that Judge K is probably done, but remember, salacious as it is, it contains allegations, not proof.

Avenetti has delivered on all his allegation so far. So, he must have pretty solid reason to send this letter. I have no doubt that he knows his game much better than all the DCUM lawyers...