ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lady trying to drive down the street to a doctor's appointment. ICE agents stop her. Some agents scream at her to move. Others smash her windows and grab her. She's totally confused about what's she's supposed to do. Eventually they yank her out of her car and arrest her. She's lucky they didn't shoot her. This is America where trying to go to a doctor's appointment is now a crime.

https://bsky.app/profile/noturtlesoup17.bsky.social/post/3mcdab3qrvs2g

Apparently they cut her seatbelt off. Nazis.

Call your members of congress and demand zero funding until ICE is reigned in. Senator Murphy has some very reasonable asks.

Dear God. Where the actual hell is Congress? The founding fathers were smart enough to set up infrastructure to avoid this very situation and we are not smart enough in 2026 to use it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.

The ICEWatch trainers know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.

Was Good in a narco gang, was she a cartel member, or was she a general criminal? No? Then why did she die?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.

Agree. This was a game to them.

Please never interfere with law enforcement operations if you value your life. Now the little boy is left without his mother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.

Lying fascist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The woman's wife yelling out "why did you have real bullets"

The woman is playing, she’s playing for fun. They don’t understand that ICE is targeting narco gangs, cartel members, and often general criminals.

It’s not a game.

Agree. This was a game to them.

Please never interfere with law enforcement operations if you value your life. Now the little boy is left without his mother.

ICE isn’t law enforcement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I just don't understand how we got to this point where every republican is freaking defending this. Any prior Republican administration would have immediately stated that this rogue ICE officer did not represent DHS as a whole or this admin. We have tons of people on the internet celebrating this woman's death. How did we get here?!

So many people have taken on their political party as their entire self worth. The way they identify themselves. Moreso than religion or ethnicity or other social construct. The fact that the internet and social media throw us into confirmation bias loops all day is the powerful drug that keeps us there. People are much less likely to think independently or critically. They side with their side, because to do anything else is the ultimate destruction of self.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Violating the use of force policy establishes his actions are objectively unreasonable, which is part of establishing he broke the law.

Are you 100% certain he violated the use of force policy?

Yes

Do you have a link to the DHS use of force policy you are referencing?

This is the DOJ policy. Federal law says the DOJ policy is the minimum standard for all federal agencies.

“Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”

https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force

It’s really an open and shut case under this policy. Even if you think she was driving at him, he had the option of getting out of the way. How do we know he could have gotten out of the way? The did in fact get out of the way and the car went past him for a hundred yards or so.

Whether he was hit is immaterial. If he believed he could be hit, putting him in immediate danger of death or serious bodily harm, deadly force is justified. Nothing that happened before the Honda Pilot was put into drive or after the shots were fired matters.

"officer created exigency"

[Anonymous]

https://bsky.app/profile/noturtlesoup17.bsky.social/post/3mcdab3qrvs2g

What the he** crime did this woman commit?

I have NEVER head of police doing anything like this.

ICE agents are SWARMING her car.

She was driving to the effing DOCTOR.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/noturtlesoup17.bsky.social/post/3mcdab3qrvs2g

What the he** crime did this woman commit?

I have NEVER head of police doing anything like this.

ICE agents are SWARMING her car.

She was driving to the effing DOCTOR.

Driving while brown.

[Anonymous]

https://bsky.app/profile/noturtlesoup17.bsky.social/post/3mcdab3qrvs2g



<div>from Imgflip Meme Generator</div>

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They just have to go back.

Yes, ICE should go back to their previous menial jobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Violating the use of force policy establishes his actions are objectively unreasonable, which is part of establishing he broke the law.

Are you 100% certain he violated the use of force policy?

Yes

Do you have a link to the DHS use of force policy you are referencing?

This is the DOJ policy. Federal law says the DOJ policy is the minimum standard for all federal agencies.

“Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury to the officer or others, and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”

https://www.justice.gov/jm/1-16000-department-justice-policy-use-force

It’s really an open and shut case under this policy. Even if you think she was driving at him, he had the option of getting out of the way. How do we know he could have gotten out of the way? The did in fact get out of the way and the car went past him for a hundred yards or so.

Whether he was hit is immaterial. If he believed he could be hit, putting him in immediate danger of death or serious bodily harm, deadly force is justified. Nothing that happened before the Honda Pilot was put into drive or after the shots were fired matters.

[Anonymous]