Johnny Depp trial in Fairfax County

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive slamdunk win for Depp. All of his charges against her were sustained with compensatory AND punitive damages totaling over $10M.

Only one of her counter-claims was successful and that wasn't even against Depp but his agent and was for only $2M.

Furthermore, in the court of public opinion, I don't think Depp has ever been more popular. She, though....I don't think she's going to have many opportunities going forward.

No. Any decent human thinks he’s a POS after this.

The campaign online to clear Depp is just another form of MAGA in this country.

Like literally…when you’re a star, they let you do it - here - the “it” is beat your wife.

Completely unsurprised by the disgusting Pieces of Sh!T that surround us here in the good ol’ USA!

He didn't beat his wife.

The UK court found he did.

So many things wrong with this verdict. Can we start our own separate thread. I need to get away from the Marjorie Taylor Greene’s in this thread. Ya know the women that try so hard to be a guy’s type of girl. Probably normalizes being slapped around. Pumps out 6 kids just to keep her man around. Loves little d*cks and big guns. I expected they’d both receive damages that would null each other out. But to clearly state that she lied is crazy.

But she did clearly lie. Several times.

It’s not possible to know this. He clearly lied too.

JFC. If it’s “not possible to know” your first sentence, then it’s not possible to know your second either. You’re not very bright.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are all the people outside the courthouse booing Amber Heard and cheering for JD with a pirate ship no less. Who are these people? Do they really think JD cares or reciprocates? How stupid and delusional are they? Ignoring every vile thing he has done and said? For what? So they can worship him?

It's the same middle aged loser women that are on this board.

‘Sup, y’all, shout out to my homies!

And I mean all middle aged loser women on the board, no matter what side of this trial you’re on!

Are you including yourself?

Yes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Massive slamdunk win for Depp. All of his charges against her were sustained with compensatory AND punitive damages totaling over $10M.

Only one of her counter-claims was successful and that wasn't even against Depp but his agent and was for only $2M.

Furthermore, in the court of public opinion, I don't think Depp has ever been more popular. She, though....I don't think she's going to have many opportunities going forward.

No. Any decent human thinks he’s a POS after this.

The campaign online to clear Depp is just another form of MAGA in this country.

Like literally…when you’re a star, they let you do it - here - the “it” is beat your wife.

Completely unsurprised by the disgusting Pieces of Sh!T that surround us here in the good ol’ USA!

He didn't beat his wife.

The UK court found he did.

So many things wrong with this verdict. Can we start our own separate thread. I need to get away from the Marjorie Taylor Greene’s in this thread. Ya know the women that try so hard to be a guy’s type of girl. Probably normalizes being slapped around. Pumps out 6 kids just to keep her man around. Loves little d*cks and big guns. I expected they’d both receive damages that would null each other out. But to clearly state that she lied is crazy.

DP. I'm about as anti-MTG as you can get. My DD and I have been protesting in front of the Supreme Court Justices' houses these last few weeks, among other things. I also experienced/witnessed horrific abuse growing up in my family of origin. Substance abuse, mental disorders, suicide, etc. run amuck in my family tree. Johnny Depp is no prize and I wouldn't wish him on anyone as a life partner. Yet, Amber Heard is no victim. I recognize a lot of her behaviors and, regardless of the verdict, I can't un-see them.

+1. GenX lifelong straight ticket D voter, except for one local office over 20 years ago. But as they’re sobbing themselves to sleep tonight because they spent the past weeks screeching on the internet how OMG YOU FOOLS AMBER IS GOING TO WIN JOHNNY STANS BLAH BLAH BLAH, they need to lie to themselves that anyone smart enough to see through AH’s BS is a “MAGA.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so disgusted by this verdict and by you Depp-lovers. WTF is wrong with you morons condoning his disgusting abusive behavior? I don't care what she did or did not do, or whether she was also abusive towards him, HE ABUSED HER. You people are sick.

You’re the sick one, defending an abuser because she’s not a man. Get help.

Why do you think PP is defending an abuser because AH is not a man? Why are people assuming that is why people may defend her? That is jumping yo conclusions. What is AH was exactly the way she is, but a man, and JD were gay? Would you still say this??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so disgusted by this verdict and by you Depp-lovers. WTF is wrong with you morons condoning his disgusting abusive behavior? I don't care what she did or did not do, or whether she was also abusive towards him, HE ABUSED HER. You people are sick.

You’re the sick one, defending an abuser because she’s not a man. Get help.

Why are you defending an abuser because he is Johnny Depp?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The right verdict.

Signed, a liberal feminist me-too supporting woman who thinks Amber used the me-too movement to up her notoriety and has now had it rightfully backfire in her face.

KAREN KAREN KAREN KAREN

You are so upset and hysterical. Your tears are delicious.

[Anonymous]

Can someone tell me the precise statement made by depp’s attorney that the jury found defamed heard?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Heard said in a statement she is "heartbroken" over the verdict.

"The disappointment I feel today is beyond words. I'm heartbroken that the mountain of evidence still was not enough to stand up to the disproportionate power, influence, and sway of my ex-husband," Heard said.

That's her story and she's sticking to it! It was all because of Depp's sway, despite a "mountain of evidence." SMH.

She’s right and I’m heartbroken for her. Depp was abusive and she had every right to write her op Ed and share her experience with an abuser. That she is imperfect as a victim doesn’t negate his abuse. It also doesn’t mean she defamed him. Sad day for women but this is the direction our country is headed in so not a total surprise. Soon you’ll be able to beat and terrify women with impunity.

+1 sad day for women

Oh please.

This is a case where a woman who is desperate for fame saw the value of leveraging the me too movement for her own narcissistic goals. She too advantage of the “believe all women” stance to ruin a man for her own gain.

I have experienced SA myself and am disgusted by her.

He ruined himself, FFS. What’s with this absurd narrative that a woman is out to ruin a man when she asserts she’s been abused. Maybe she wants justice.

Also, being a survivor doesn’t make you immune from being wrong on this issue.

+1 she didn’t even name him. How does he even know if it was her statement or his substance abuse problems that caused him to lose roles? Hope he never works again due to this stunt.

You’re cute. That’s not going to happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Depp is yucking it up in London. With one of the trial witnesses no less.

So much disrespect for the court system and the jurors. And generally everyone.

You suckers.

Why? He’s suing her! You all just want drama. Neither one “needs” to be there.

You are a f’ing moron. Yes he should have been there. For Two more days after districting everyone’s lives. Yes plaintiffs are always there for verdict.

Looks like his addiction is back that he couldn’t restrain himself and stay for a few more days.

Uh, no, but thanks for playing.

[Anonymous]

Some serious spell check needed in this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So weird to see a bunch of MAGA republicans cheering about this. I thought y’all hated degenerate Hollywood?

I have said this over and over again -- Johnny stans are dumb middle aged bored housewives. Who else are dumb middle-aged bored housewives? Oh, let's see the women looking out their window in the afternoon who call the cops on any black person they see, the same ones who were SO concerned for their children's education and well-being that they voted for Glenn Youngkin in Virginia, etc., etc. I have lost all respect for you K/Bs.

Nope. “Stan” is idiotic adolescent talk, which I don’t use, but I’m a full-time employed parent who sure as hell isn’t “calling the cops” on any black people, wouldn’t piss on Youngkin if he was on fire, let alone vote for him, but if your fictitious narrative helps you lick your wounds, have at it. Just know we’re all laughing at you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And Depp is yucking it up in London. With one of the trial witnesses no less.

So much disrespect for the court system and the jurors. And generally everyone.

You suckers.

Why? He’s suing her! You all just want drama. Neither one “needs” to be there.

You are a f’ing moron. Yes he should have been there. For Two more days after districting everyone’s lives. Yes plaintiffs are always there for verdict.

Looks like his addiction is back that he couldn’t restrain himself and stay for a few more days.

Uh, no, but thanks for playing.

Fairfax just wasn’t cutting it for JD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am so disgusted by this verdict and by you Depp-lovers. WTF is wrong with you morons condoning his disgusting abusive behavior? I don't care what she did or did not do, or whether she was also abusive towards him, HE ABUSED HER. You people are sick.

You’re the sick one, defending an abuser because she’s not a man. Get help.

Why are you defending an abuser because he is Johnny Depp?

I don’t give a damn about Johnny Depp. Amber Heard is a terrible liar and she made a mockery of the judicial process. Meal ticket attempt foiled. Judgement richly deserved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People are nuts if they don't think Depp's going to be in blockbusters ASAP. Look what Cruise just did with a record box office for Top Gun redux. Cruise and Depp are basically the last true movie stars.

+100. This was a great PR event for him and it's rumored he's already been signed to be in a new Beetlejuice movie with Winona Ryder.

Rando fangirls speculate lots of things. This one is decidedly false.

You have no idea if it is or isn’t. Wishful thinking on your part.

Cite a credible source if you think it’s true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone tell me the precise statement made by depp’s attorney that the jury found defamed heard?

A link to the verdict form with an explanation of on which each was found liable was posted several pages back. You can find the exact language there.