Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread, Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://archive.org/details/cupola-1983/page/n143

This is one of Brett's pals.

Mentions Renate. Mentions some poor gal Whitney.

AND . . . how about the "Ridge Klux Klan?"

Many dismiss this yearbook as garbage but it is worth a study. Lot's of Brett's pals make reference to "Ridge Klux Klan" and Renate and Whitney.

I mean . . . was there REALLY an FBI investigation???? FFS!!!

He is FFFFFilthy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His WSJ op-ed is tepid and pathetic.

So tries-too-hard.

He's acting as if he's never been told No. If he just keeps asking, maybe they'll say Yes.

You are both idiotic. The op-ed was well-written and contrite for his argumentative tone during the hearing. Which was perfectly understandable to normal people who can put themselves in his shoes and realize that's how anyone would act when faced with these horrible and wrongful allegations - and in front of his family, no less.

LOL NO

SNICKER YES

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Op-Ed actually hurts him. I don't know who has been advising him, between this and the Fox interview and his demeanor when he testified, but all three have put him in a worse position than he would have been had he followed his likely instincts.

Agree. Trotting out the women in his life like a shield. He didn’t apologize and proved that he has learned nothing.

And, Fox News and WSJ seems pretty partisan in the era of the GOP’s fake news.

You are ridiculous. He did indeed apologize: “I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been. I might have been too emotional at times,” Kavanaugh wrote. “I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said.”

And he hasn't "trotted out the women in his life" at all - they came together to support him on their own. Imagine that! These women can actually think for themselves and make up their own minds! They won't be told what to do and whom to support by anyone. How disappointing!

And as for partisan, why on earth should he have submitted his op-ed to the Post or the NYT - two clearly liberal biased publications? You can't possibly claim they are somehow neutral? The WSJ was a good choice for him. Why would he take his statement to media that clearly is fanning the flames of his "guilt"? How idiotic can you get?

Huh? That's not an apology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the WSJ piece, clearly he did not learn from Thursday. He can't go on that Court and behave like this. His team advised him incorrectly when they instructed him to do the WSJ article.

I bet admissions to Yale from Georgetown Prep will be zilch for some time to come.

Tonight, I am praying for Gardner and Sasse along with the others.

Good grief. Obviously, he wouldn't be on the SC, acting emotional, as he did in a hearing specifically called to address alleged sexual assault on his part, numbskull. Do any of you have ANY common sense?

And I disagree about the WSJ article. I'm glad he wrote it. Honestly, if he hadn't, you people would be complaining that he should write an op-ed and apologize!! You're not going to approve of anything he does because - shocker! - you want him destroyed.

Judges, like all of us, have all kind of difficult things going on in their lives. Some things are harder than others. But there can be no thing so hard for them that they cannot keep their cool. Nothing. He blew it. Under the same circumstances, Clarence Thomas stayed cool. I don't like politics or his judicial philosophy, but at least he acted like a judge should act.

I don't want Kavanaugh's life destroyed. And it won't be. He will go back to his current highly respected judicial position. And even if he loses that, he can go back to his former career as a political hack. His family will still love him. He will still have his drinking buddies to hang out with. So he really needs to get over himself. Life sucks sometimes. That's an important lesson for a judge to learn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one thought his dad was dead and that was why he was crying over his dad's calendars? His dad was there behind him! NOT DEAD!

Does this have to be explained *yet again*?? He was crying at the mention of his dad's name because he was mortified to have to defend himself against wrongful allegations - IN FRONT OF HIS FAMILY. If you have family members you love (do you??), you'd be devastated too.

He was full of crap. Sorry you bought it!

Really hope no one falsely accuses you of something. It would be mighty sad to see you break down in tears.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you WATCH his testimony? You are a ninny.

This was meant for 23:55!

Yes, I did. And right back atcha, in spades.
-23:55

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It seems Daines has gotten an earful. He's going to be back here on a red-eye, or something. He's going to get his Yes vote heard.

Links are so nice.

Here it is.

https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1048038819709288448

I'm sure this won't be the first time Daines has let his daughter down.

So he's skipping out on his daughter's wedding to confirm a man who treated women like crap. Just another example of Republicans treating women like second class citizens. Even their own family members.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Op-Ed actually hurts him. I don't know who has been advising him, between this and the Fox interview and his demeanor when he testified, but all three have put him in a worse position than he would have been had he followed his likely instincts.

Agree. Trotting out the women in his life like a shield. He didn’t apologize and proved that he has learned nothing.

And, Fox News and WSJ seems pretty partisan in the era of the GOP’s fake news.

You are ridiculous. He did indeed apologize: “I was very emotional last Thursday, more so than I have ever been. I might have been too emotional at times,” Kavanaugh wrote. “I know that my tone was sharp, and I said a few things I should not have said.”

And he hasn't "trotted out the women in his life" at all - they came together to support him on their own. Imagine that! These women can actually think for themselves and make up their own minds! They won't be told what to do and whom to support by anyone. How disappointing!

And as for partisan, why on earth should he have submitted his op-ed to the Post or the NYT - two clearly liberal biased publications? You can't possibly claim they are somehow neutral? The WSJ was a good choice for him. Why would he take his statement to media that clearly is fanning the flames of his "guilt"? How idiotic can you get?

There is no apology there. The words “I’m sorry”or “I apologize” literally appear no where.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His WSJ op-ed is tepid and pathetic.

So tries-too-hard.

He's acting as if he's never been told No. If he just keeps asking, maybe they'll say Yes.

You are both idiotic. The op-ed was well-written and contrite for his argumentative tone during the hearing. Which was perfectly understandable to normal people who can put themselves in his shoes and realize that's how anyone would act when faced with these horrible and wrongful allegations - and in front of his family, no less.

The trolls seem to think they kNow something the rest of us don’t. They know Ford and Ramirez and the other woman who accused Kavanaugh are lying. How do they know this? I believe Ford because I do not see any reason for her to lie. I disbelieve Kavanaugh because he has every reason to lie about Ford’s allegation. But I freely admit that I do not know the truth. Does anyone? Surely not the trolls, yet they keep posting the lie that they know the allegations against Kavanaugh are false. They cannot know that, so they are posting lies. That doesn’t help your guy, folks, just adding to the lies we know he told under oath. If you posted the truth —that you do not know the truth any more than I do — and said you believe Kavanaugh for some other reason, we’ll that would be fine since it’s your opinion.

But you keep posting lies. Why must you lie? Clearly the truth does not support Kavanaugh.

Are you always this pedantic? Wow. I'm the PP and I used the term "wrongful allegations" because he denied the allegations. I don't know who is telling the truth here, and I have no problem admitting that. But obviously, since he DENIED the allegations, they are, from his perspective - WRONGFUL. I was trying to explain to those of you with zero empathy why he acted the way he did during the hearing - emotional, furious, crying. Because he's trying to defend himself against allegations he claims are FALSE. Can you even comprehend that?

And if you're just going to call people you disagree with "trolls," you should know how moronic you look. Do you spend your days telling everyone around you they're trolls if they don't agree with you? So incredibly juvenile.

[Anonymous]

Kavanaugh is terrible plain and simple.

How.Many.Times.Does.It.Have.To.Be.Said.

HE IS NOT FIT TO BE A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.

The gambling. The debt. The lying. The perjury. The anger. The only child syndrome.

If anyone knows anything they can certainly SEE he is a LIAR. He does NOT deserve a LIFETIME appointment to the highest court in the land. He's a drunk and a liar.

All of you Republicans are so determined to win that you do not care that our executive and legislative branches of government are already in a shambles and the judicial branch is next if this CLOWN is appointed.

Oh and I have no doubt he WILL be appointed. DISGUSTING.

AND Pathetic.

The sycophants from Chevy Chase and Blessed Sacrament. Wow.

Who would know it was 2018 with the way women are standing up for this DB? SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His WSJ op-ed is tepid and pathetic.

So tries-too-hard.

He's acting as if he's never been told No. If he just keeps asking, maybe they'll say Yes.

You are both idiotic. The op-ed was well-written and contrite for his argumentative tone during the hearing. Which was perfectly understandable to normal people who can put themselves in his shoes and realize that's how anyone would act when faced with these horrible and wrongful allegations - and in front of his family, no less.

The trolls seem to think they kNow something the rest of us don’t. They know Ford and Ramirez and the other woman who accused Kavanaugh are lying. How do they know this? I believe Ford because I do not see any reason for her to lie. I disbelieve Kavanaugh because he has every reason to lie about Ford’s allegation. But I freely admit that I do not know the truth. Does anyone? Surely not the trolls, yet they keep posting the lie that they know the allegations against Kavanaugh are false. They cannot know that, so they are posting lies. That doesn’t help your guy, folks, just adding to the lies we know he told under oath. If you posted the truth —that you do not know the truth any more than I do — and said you believe Kavanaugh for some other reason, we’ll that would be fine since it’s your opinion.

But you keep posting lies. Why must you lie? Clearly the truth does not support Kavanaugh.

Are you always this pedantic? Wow. I'm the PP and I used the term "wrongful allegations" because he denied the allegations. I don't know who is telling the truth here, and I have no problem admitting that. But obviously, since he DENIED the allegations, they are, from his perspective - WRONGFUL. I was trying to explain to those of you with zero empathy why he acted the way he did during the hearing - emotional, furious, crying. Because he's trying to defend himself against allegations he claims are FALSE. Can you even comprehend that?

And if you're just going to call people you disagree with "trolls," you should know how moronic you look. Do you spend your days telling everyone around you they're trolls if they don't agree with you? So incredibly juvenile.

No, the fact that he denied them does not make them wrongful. They’re not even wrongful in his eyes if the he lied in his denials.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:His WSJ op-ed is tepid and pathetic.

So tries-too-hard.

He's acting as if he's never been told No. If he just keeps asking, maybe they'll say Yes.

You are both idiotic. The op-ed was well-written and contrite for his argumentative tone during the hearing. Which was perfectly understandable to normal people who can put themselves in his shoes and realize that's how anyone would act when faced with these horrible and wrongful allegations - and in front of his family, no less.

The op-ed was weak and sniveling. With a good dose of "I wouldn't hit you if you didn't make me."

Yeah, gotta see everything through that prism of fictional abuse, amirite? Life must be difficult for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the July 1 party folks, time to change your theories:

Christine Blasey Ford lawyer says FBI wrongly focused on July 1, 1982 party
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/4/christine-blasey-ford-lawyer-says-fbi-wrongly-focu/

A member of Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team says FBI interviewers are focusing on the wrong date.

The FBI has interviewed people who, calendar entries show, were present for a July 1, 1982, gathering of high school students, including Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.

But Ford has never believed the assault occurred that night because some of those listed as having been present are people she knew well and would have remembered.

Honestly, I've about lost my patience with all of this. She should have come forward years ago when her memory of the alleged events was better. Sniffing around 36 years later is a futile and pointless endeavor.

There is exactly one person out there who cares what you think. Go look in a mirror and you'll find them.

And you think somehow you're special? That your opinion is the one that matters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given the WSJ piece, clearly he did not learn from Thursday. He can't go on that Court and behave like this. His team advised him incorrectly when they instructed him to do the WSJ article.

I bet admissions to Yale from Georgetown Prep will be zilch for some time to come.

Tonight, I am praying for Gardner and Sasse along with the others.

Good grief. Obviously, he wouldn't be on the SC, acting emotional, as he did in a hearing specifically called to address alleged sexual assault on his part, numbskull. Do any of you have ANY common sense?

And I disagree about the WSJ article. I'm glad he wrote it. Honestly, if he hadn't, you people would be complaining that he should write an op-ed and apologize!! You're not going to approve of anything he does because - shocker! - you want him destroyed.

Judges, like all of us, have all kind of difficult things going on in their lives. Some things are harder than others. But there can be no thing so hard for them that they cannot keep their cool. Nothing. He blew it. Under the same circumstances, Clarence Thomas stayed cool. I don't like politics or his judicial philosophy, but at least he acted like a judge should act.

I don't want Kavanaugh's life destroyed. And it won't be. He will go back to his current highly respected judicial position. And even if he loses that, he can go back to his former career as a political hack. His family will still love him. He will still have his drinking buddies to hang out with. So he really needs to get over himself. Life sucks sometimes. That's an important lesson for a judge to learn.

You are delusional. And, quite frankly, frightening.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh is terrible plain and simple.

How.Many.Times.Does.It.Have.To.Be.Said.

HE IS NOT FIT TO BE A SUPREME COURT JUSTICE.

The gambling. The debt. The lying. The perjury. The anger. The only child syndrome.

If anyone knows anything they can certainly SEE he is a LIAR. He does NOT deserve a LIFETIME appointment to the highest court in the land. He's a drunk and a liar.

All of you Republicans are so determined to win that you do not care that our executive and legislative branches of government are already in a shambles and the judicial branch is next if this CLOWN is appointed.

Oh and I have no doubt he WILL be appointed. DISGUSTING.

AND Pathetic.

The sycophants from Chevy Chase and Blessed Sacrament. Wow.

Who would know it was 2018 with the way women are standing up for this DB? SMH.

We are talking largely about people who voted for Trump. We already know they condone sexual assault because they voted for him after hearing him brag about sexually assaulting women. We already know they condone dishonesty because they voted for Trump when it was proven over and over again that almost everything he says is a lie. Their support of Kavanaugh now isn’t even blind, they don’t really believe he didn’t do these things, they simply don’t care because lying and rape is okay by them.