Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

That’s the best news I’ve heard all day! Yes, please take a nap and move on

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

Reality finds no refuge in a maelstrom of standom.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

Reality finds no refuge in a maelstrom of standom.

Ah, yes, asking for evidence, the surest sign of a stan. Lawyers, cops, Supreme Court, teachers, hiring managers, the whole gamut - they're all just stans!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

Reality finds no refuge in a maelstrom of standom.

Ah, yes, asking for evidence, the surest sign of a stan. Lawyers, cops, Supreme Court, teachers, hiring managers, the whole gamut - they're all just stans!

I’m a DP but they do tend to swoop in, lend their “voice” and then swoop off. Like the voting campaign, or the hand washing advice on their old Sussex royal website, or Travalyst etc. they aren’t experts in anything, so it makes sense that they just “shine a light” on issues. It’s not really a huge deal, since this is the MO of most royals. Not sure why PPs are so sensitive. It’s ok that not everyone thinks m and h walk on water

[Anonymous]

It’s so sad that Megan is not letting Harry go back to England for Xmas to see his granny. Probably her last one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

Reality finds no refuge in a maelstrom of standom.

Ah, yes, asking for evidence, the surest sign of a stan. Lawyers, cops, Supreme Court, teachers, hiring managers, the whole gamut - they're all just stans!

I’m a DP but they do tend to swoop in, lend their “voice” and then swoop off. Like the voting campaign, or the hand washing advice on their old Sussex royal website, or Travalyst etc. they aren’t experts in anything, so it makes sense that they just “shine a light” on issues. It’s not really a huge deal, since this is the MO of most royals. Not sure why PPs are so sensitive. It’s ok that not everyone thinks m and h walk on water

Certainly, I can see why people would not love them, or even remotely like them. Your comment is a normal one though! There are some unhinged posters on here that spew the craziest things. The more I witness, I’m fairly certain there is somebody trolling everyone with insane comments to keep the thread going.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so sad that Megan is not letting Harry go back to England for Xmas to see his granny. Probably her last one.

Oh come on, now you are being obvious 😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

Reality finds no refuge in a maelstrom of standom.

Ah, yes, asking for evidence, the surest sign of a stan. Lawyers, cops, Supreme Court, teachers, hiring managers, the whole gamut - they're all just stans!

I’m a DP but they do tend to swoop in, lend their “voice” and then swoop off. Like the voting campaign, or the hand washing advice on their old Sussex royal website, or Travalyst etc. they aren’t experts in anything, so it makes sense that they just “shine a light” on issues. It’s not really a huge deal, since this is the MO of most royals. Not sure why PPs are so sensitive. It’s ok that not everyone thinks m and h walk on water

Exactly; the other royals do the same thing. I was specifically asking for evidence of them claiming the work of others as their own, but it looks like the PP who made that claim is unable to back them up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s so sad that Megan is not letting Harry go back to England for Xmas to see his granny. Probably her last one.

Are there sources for this? Did Meghan tell you that she's not letting Harry go back?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep whining. Prince Harry's got cards galore.

What exactly are we supposed to glean from this? We already know that throwing their "support" behind popular things without rolling up their sleeves and doing any hard work and then basking in the glory if said thing succeeds is their MO. Is there some new information on offer here?

What a weirdly cynical take. When has this happened before?

It's not weirdly cynical at all if you've seen even a little bit of how they operate.

The fact that you can't name any examples speaks volumes.

There are plenty of examples of them glomming on to so many seemingly popular causes or issues in this thread. Don't be lazy. Nobody has time for your gaslighting.

You are accusing someone else of gaslighting? PP just asked for examples so you can back up YOUR point. We don’t have to believe you just because you say so. If there are so many, you should easily be able to name them.

PP is not the arbiter of anything and I am not going to do their work for them. They can avail themselves of the information in this thread that has been posted repeatedly, if they are genuinely curious. I suspect that what they will really do is handwave away a mountain of evidence right in front of their faces and I am done playing that game with MM stans. Yawn, next.

What mountain of evidence? I genuinely just want to know. What mountains of examples do you have of them claiming the work of others?

The mountain of evidence is in the PPs imagination, for which there is no web address 🤣

Reality finds no refuge in a maelstrom of standom.

DP. Well if you have the info then lead them out of ignorance. Why all the guessing games?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s so sad that Megan is not letting Harry go back to England for Xmas to see his granny. Probably her last one.

Are there sources for this? Did Meghan tell you that she's not letting Harry go back?

I have it on good authority that The Yellow Wallpaper is actually about Harry.

*laughs in crazy*