Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?

Hey! I live here lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?

I’d go! Almost going there and writing my own article bc these people are not finding anything out to the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?

Hey! I live here lol

What are you waiting for- they open 9am tomorrow!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Unless the indictment is sealed, which it should not be, I will have tons of detail. This is the charging document and BB can move to dismiss etc. So while it won’t have all detail, it will have a lot.

Unless VA state court works differently?

We need that document. Not some podcast.

I believe you can go in person to the circuit court and request it.

Seems like it’s $0.50 per page
I wonder how many pages there is and if anyone can just go and spend some time there looking at it instead of copying it.

If it’s that easy, why didn’t all these journalists go there and got it to write a complete article?

They lazy! And who wants to go to Fairfax?

Hey! I live here lol

Want to make a quick $40.00?

[Anonymous]

That’s why I was asking if we necessarily need to get copies or we can just go there and sit down to read the files and take notes.
Not feeling like spending money on it, but I’d go there to read it. Also, I’m not sure how it works, if there would be any evidence or if it’s just the indictment as a statement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the podcast linked above, Chief Davis recently refused to comment on the nature of JR's rx to ANY of the parties, stating that the investigation is ongoing.

Nothing else of interest on that podcast?

They said Juliana emailed herself CB’s photo on swimsuit.
Was I the only one that heard that part?

Yes that is what they said.

The Washington Post article had me thinking that CB had emailed herself the photo around the same time she texted it to BB by their use of the word "she". Their language:

"A month before the killings, authorities said, Christine Banfield sent a picture of herself to her husband, which Magalhães’s lawyer said she also sent to herself in an email: a petite woman in a one-piece bathing suit."

Ridiculous you people taking some Rando's podcast for truth. Christine emailed herself the photo, y0ur podcast buddy is making things up.

[Anonymous]

Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.

Dude, You’re Being Very UnDude.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.

Did you email her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.

Which link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.

What are you doing here among so many dumb people, smartass

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are you guys stupid? Did you not even click on the link you posted? It gives an email address to get the indictment from someone who already has it. The people on this thread are the dumbest of dumb idiots.

Which link?

https://www.listennotes.com/da/podcasts/the-outlier-podcast/the-au-pair-the-affair-and-a-Qt3b_EaWVrA/

Look at the notes

[Anonymous]

Guys, the indictment is just a paper saying exactly what the podcast lady read…. Nothing else. That’s all that’s in the document.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guys, the indictment is just a paper saying exactly what the podcast lady read…. Nothing else. That’s all that’s in the document.

we don't really know what the indictment says... I didn't listen to the pod. some indictments say just enough for a true bill. some are ripe with details. Im not a lawyer.

I emailed the email on the link.. I guess I may have doxxed myself..if they send it I'll upload it to a hosting site.