VHSL Boys Lacrosse 2026 Season

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean gotta give it to indy. As much as I hate them, it was a great game on both sides of the ball. DW’s son might be one of the best in the state.

Has been for a couple of years now. Def enjoying all the single coverage he gets due to 11 having close to 90 goals and 7, 2, 99 and 8 lighting up the scoreboard. Too many options on Indy to double much.

This will be a single digit game, and 1st to 7 or 8 wins. They won't be padding stats on a farmland country school.

15-7 Indy

Quote your post after with a mea culpa.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean gotta give it to indy. As much as I hate them, it was a great game on both sides of the ball. DW’s son might be one of the best in the state.

Has been for a couple of years now. Def enjoying all the single coverage he gets due to 11 having close to 90 goals and 7, 2, 99 and 8 lighting up the scoreboard. Too many options on Indy to double much.

Wonder why Kodelka didn't recruit him if he is one of the best in the state? Roanoke is nice but can't seem to get past Lynchburg in the ODAC. Nice player though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean gotta give it to indy. As much as I hate them, it was a great game on both sides of the ball. DW’s son might be one of the best in the state.

Has been for a couple of years now. Def enjoying all the single coverage he gets due to 11 having close to 90 goals and 7, 2, 99 and 8 lighting up the scoreboard. Too many options on Indy to double much.

Wonder why Kodelka didn't recruit him if he is one of the best in the state? Roanoke is nice but can't seem to get past Lynchburg in the ODAC. Nice player though.

Everyone is dumber after reading this post

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean gotta give it to indy. As much as I hate them, it was a great game on both sides of the ball. DW’s son might be one of the best in the state.

Has been for a couple of years now. Def enjoying all the single coverage he gets due to 11 having close to 90 goals and 7, 2, 99 and 8 lighting up the scoreboard. Too many options on Indy to double much.

Wonder why Kodelka didn't recruit him if he is one of the best in the state? Roanoke is nice but can't seem to get past Lynchburg in the ODAC. Nice player though.

Everyone is dumber after reading this post

Thompson seemed to miss him too. Will be fun to see the Noke play CNU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean gotta give it to indy. As much as I hate them, it was a great game on both sides of the ball. DW’s son might be one of the best in the state.

Has been for a couple of years now. Def enjoying all the single coverage he gets due to 11 having close to 90 goals and 7, 2, 99 and 8 lighting up the scoreboard. Too many options on Indy to double much.

Wonder why Kodelka didn't recruit him if he is one of the best in the state? Roanoke is nice but can't seem to get past Lynchburg in the ODAC. Nice player though.

Everyone is dumber after reading this post

Thompson seemed to miss him too. Will be fun to see the Noke play CNU

The PP didn't say Koudelka missed him. Roanoke will probably be more interested in staying competitive in the ODAC and squeaking by Mary Wash now that the Kammermans are gone, and aren't worried about getting handled or blown out by CNU again out of conference.

[Anonymous]

I guess I’m curious as to why you say he wasn’t recruited to this or that school?
Ever think that maybe he picked Roanoke because that’s where daddy went? (My guess)
I spent 30 seconds on google and found that out.

[Anonymous]

6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Why do you think Riverside is a 5 goal underdog? They seem like a favorite to me. Others look fine.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

Or if it is a prediction but not a betting line Indy by 4 would work it is confusing. I would be surprised anyone would favor Madison by 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

I think we all know what he means that each team will win by that amount- fairly standard when you are not talking betting lines and not giving a final score.
My suggestion is to get off the betting apps kid, it will do you no good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

Or if it is a prediction but not a betting line Indy by 4 would work it is confusing. I would be surprised anyone would favor Madison by 4

Yes, my point. its read as a prediction not a betting line. Thanks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

I think we all know what he means that each team will win by that amount- fairly standard when you are not talking betting lines and not giving a final score.
My suggestion is to get off the betting apps kid, it will do you no good.

It's actually not standard as I haven't ever seen it anywhere ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

Or if it is a prediction but not a betting line Indy by 4 would work it is confusing. I would be surprised anyone would favor Madison by 4

I have 2 of the 3 flipped, Riverside wins as well. As confusing as fhe OP's post is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:6a:
Indy v Madison - Indy +4

5a
Riverside v Stone Bridge - Riverside +5

4a
Glass v Salem - Salem +2

Do you mean you think Indy is going to win by 4? If so, that is written as Indy -4. That's pretty basic sports knowledge.

I think we all know what he means that each team will win by that amount- fairly standard when you are not talking betting lines and not giving a final score.
My suggestion is to get off the betting apps kid, it will do you no good.

It's actually not standard as I haven't ever seen it anywhere ever.

Agree. No one writes the favorite as +... In the age of gambling on your mobile phone and betting lines on ESPN previews, that should be pretty well understood.