ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

There wasn't even a reason to pull their service vehicles over and get out of their pick up trucks. It all went down from there. They could have just continued on to their break.

I would love someone to address that. All the other cars went through. Why did they stop and force a confrontation?

They are not traffic cops so since she wasn't physically impeding them...

Any thoughts?

We all know the answer to this. The only people joining ICE now are angry dummies who want to rough people up.

I'm aware that Ross is an ICE veteran of 10 years. He also loves the Proud Boys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that folks here are reposting the opinions of Charlemagne da G-d and Don Lemon as if they are wise, knowledgeable commentators tells me all I need to know.

Congrats on being told all you need to know. You don't matter and neither do I. Reminder:

In Minnesota, there is no statute of limitations for murder or any other crime resulting in the death of the victim. Prosecutors may bring charges at any time after the death has occurred, regardless of how much time has passed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

You have no idea what anybody would do in that situation.

All these armchair critics, I swear.

There wasn't even a reason to pull their service vehicles over and get out of their pick up trucks. It all went down from there. They could have just continued on to their break.

I would love someone to address that. All the other cars went through. Why did they stop and force a confrontation?

They are not traffic cops so since she wasn't physically impeding them...

Any thoughts?

Easy...Power trip.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that folks here are reposting the opinions of Charlemagne da G-d and Don Lemon as if they are wise, knowledgeable commentators tells me all I need to know.

As compared to the opinions of the senile moron in office. As if he's a wise, knowledgeable commenter. You continuing to grovel on the floor to lick his boots tells me all I need to know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The fact that folks here are reposting the opinions of Charlemagne da G-d and Don Lemon as if they are wise, knowledgeable commentators tells me all I need to know.

I noticed that you didn’t say that either one was incorrect. But mostly they get posted just because they’re making fun of the minority opinion here that this was just shooting and a just occupation of a US city.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that folks here are reposting the opinions of Charlemagne da G-d and Don Lemon as if they are wise, knowledgeable commentators tells me all I need to know.

Congrats on being told all you need to know. You don't matter and neither do I. Reminder:

In Minnesota, there is no statute of limitations for murder or any other crime resulting in the death of the victim. Prosecutors may bring charges at any time after the death has occurred, regardless of how much time has passed.

Someone needs to post a countdown clock outside of Ross's house marking the days until January 20, 2029.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that folks here are reposting the opinions of Charlemagne da G-d and Don Lemon as if they are wise, knowledgeable commentators tells me all I need to know.

Congrats on being told all you need to know. You don't matter and neither do I. Reminder:

In Minnesota, there is no statute of limitations for murder or any other crime resulting in the death of the victim. Prosecutors may bring charges at any time after the death has occurred, regardless of how much time has passed.

Someone needs to post a countdown clock outside of Ross's house marking the days until January 20, 2029.

He might never set foot there again.

I bet his wife is pissed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

I wouldn’t say laughable, more sinister. Ross was border control before this and they have been found out to purposely put themselves in front of vehicles so they could claim self defense. This was premeditated murder. The tell is him switching phone to other hand. Of course we’ll be lucky if he gets charged with manslaughter but this was straight up execution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

Everybody on this board would have avoided Good's car by just standing in place or taking a very casual step to the right. He's making the "fear for his life" defense because that's literally all he has. And it comes across as completely laughable to anybody who actually watches the video.

I wouldn’t say laughable, more sinister. Ross was border control before this and they have been found out to purposely put themselves in front of vehicles so they could claim self defense. This was premeditated murder. The tell is him switching phone to other hand. Of course we’ll be lucky if he gets charged with manslaughter but this was straight up execution.

He also testified under oath months ago in the federal case about the incident where he was injured that the best practice for the other agent involved was to step out of the way. Links to testimony earlier in the thread.

[Anonymous]

Minneapolis is an occupied city. ICE is Trump’s private army of thugs. Would much rather have illegal immigrants vs illegal police state.

[Anonymous]

I just don't understand how we got to this point where every republican is freaking defending this. Any prior Republican administration would have immediately stated that this rogue ICE officer did not represent DHS as a whole or this admin. We have tons of people on the internet celebrating this woman's death. How did we get here?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was raised to stay away from law enforcement as much as possible. To not harass or get near law enforcement. And to never go near any so called protests. I think my parents did a good job. I drill this into my kids almost everyday. I suggest that any and all parents do the same. Tell your kids to stay away from law enforcement and protests.

ICE is only there to enforce immigration law. There is no reason they should be shooting Americans.

Unless they are agitators paid to harass and impede federal agents with their cars and drive into armed agents when resisting arrest.

Have you all ever seen proof that protestors are paid?

There’s no proof that protesters are paid, but DHS is paying influencers to promote ICE.

https://mashable.com/article/ice-recruiting-social-media-influencers-leaked-document?utm_campaign=trueAnthem:+Manual&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwZnRzaAPTQtNleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeYmKtAX8Wrteo5NM1-T0nsfhq7rwnTbwZY8VvPaRU9Znkl6nyqXP3RmStu98_aem_ujS_F8q9sjcFEjIsQQPY9A

[Anonymous]

Ice agent "we killed that lesbian " and threatening other people.

https://l.smartnews.com/p-6XumwNvG/7mFtG3

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: Minneapolis is an occupied city. ICE is Trump’s private army of thugs. Would much rather have illegal immigrants vs illegal police state.

And you is what is wrong with democrats in this country follows the laws and don’t have problem. If you want to protest protest congress to change the laws not interfere with federal investigations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Repost

I hold a research grant focused on vehicle ramming attacks, and I curate what I believe is the largest database of these incidents, more than 500 cases worldwide since 1987.
As a result, I have watched more video footage of vehicle ramming attacks than most people ever will.

That is why I am going to be direct about what the available video shows in the killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis on January 7, 2026. Based on the publicly available footage described by multiple outlets, I do not see indicators consistent with a deliberate vehicle ramming attempt.
When authorities claim “she tried to run over an officer,” they are not just offering an interpretation. They are trying to lock in a narrative that justifies lethal force after the fact.

What I see, and what is being described in reporting based on video review, looks like ambiguity and escalation, not a textbook ramming attempt. Reports indicate the agent was not in the vehicle’s direct path when shots were fired, and that at least some shots were fired from the side as the vehicle moved away.

This matters because I know what ramming attempts look like when they are real.
Across hundreds of cases, intentional vehicle ramming attacks tend to leave a signature in the footage.
* A purposeful approach line toward a person.
* Commitment to that line.
* Steering corrections that track a target.
* Acceleration and follow through.

Those indicators are the difference between “the vehicle moved” and “the vehicle was used as the weapon.” When the state kills first and invents the threat afterward, it is not policing, it is death squad behavior.

~ Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, PhD
Associate Professor at the Royal Military College
of Canada

So the ice agent should know what this expert knows?
I’m not defending the agent. I’m calling this out as a poor, specific argument.

The ICE agent should know how to diffuse situations instead of incite them. He should know not to keep walking in front of a running car repeatedly to take a video if he perceived an actual threat.

He didn't perceive a threat, he was trying to make something happen so he could shoot her.

Even their training manual cites these values. So Ross was in stark violation there.